Head and Neck Imaging with a Dental CBCT Device: Comparison of 360° and 180° Rotation Angles in Effective Dose and Quantitative Image Quality in a Phantom Study

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Hakan Amasya, Osman Günay, Fatih Kesmezacar, Duygu Tunçman, Nami Yeyin, Eylem Kekeç, Tülin Zengin, Kaan Orhan, Songül Çavdar Karaçam, Mustafa Demir
{"title":"Head and Neck Imaging with a Dental CBCT Device: Comparison of 360° and 180° Rotation Angles in Effective Dose and Quantitative Image Quality in a Phantom Study","authors":"Hakan Amasya, Osman Günay, Fatih Kesmezacar, Duygu Tunçman, Nami Yeyin, Eylem Kekeç, Tülin Zengin, Kaan Orhan, Songül Çavdar Karaçam, Mustafa Demir","doi":"10.2174/0115734056316438241203095215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to investigate the effect of full- and half-rotation angles on patient radiation dose and quantitative image quality in CBCT imaging of the head and neck region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 67 TLDs were used for the dosimetry of 16 different regions in the head and neck slices of the anthropometric phantom. The Hyperion X9 Pro (MyRay, Cefla, Imola, Italy) CBCT device was used with a 90 kV pulsed beam and a 13x16e FOV size. Two separate imaging modes (Regular 360 0 and Quick 180 0) were tested, and the mA was determined by the software. Effective doses (EDs) were calculated using the coefficients recommended by ICRP 103 (2007). For the quantitative image quality tests, three VOIs were manually selected for three separate densities in image slices selected from the mandible, maxilla, and paranasal sinus regions of both volumes separately. Pixel values were averaged, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and uniformity tests were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 360 0, ED was calculated as 1.903 mSv and the highest absorbed dose was found in the oral mucosa (1.566 mSv). In 180 0, ED was calculated as 1.123 mSv and the highest absorbed dose was found in the right temporal squamous region (0.984 mSv). The reduction in ED was found to be 41% for full- and half-rotation angles. Quick/Regular ratios for SNR and CNR were changed between 0.83-0.91.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The magnitude of reduction in ED was found to be higher than the quantitative image quality; however, the impact of this change on diagnosis should be analyzed according to the imaging purpose.</p>","PeriodicalId":54215,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056316438241203095215","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the effect of full- and half-rotation angles on patient radiation dose and quantitative image quality in CBCT imaging of the head and neck region.

Methods: A total of 67 TLDs were used for the dosimetry of 16 different regions in the head and neck slices of the anthropometric phantom. The Hyperion X9 Pro (MyRay, Cefla, Imola, Italy) CBCT device was used with a 90 kV pulsed beam and a 13x16e FOV size. Two separate imaging modes (Regular 360 0 and Quick 180 0) were tested, and the mA was determined by the software. Effective doses (EDs) were calculated using the coefficients recommended by ICRP 103 (2007). For the quantitative image quality tests, three VOIs were manually selected for three separate densities in image slices selected from the mandible, maxilla, and paranasal sinus regions of both volumes separately. Pixel values were averaged, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and uniformity tests were conducted.

Results: In 360 0, ED was calculated as 1.903 mSv and the highest absorbed dose was found in the oral mucosa (1.566 mSv). In 180 0, ED was calculated as 1.123 mSv and the highest absorbed dose was found in the right temporal squamous region (0.984 mSv). The reduction in ED was found to be 41% for full- and half-rotation angles. Quick/Regular ratios for SNR and CNR were changed between 0.83-0.91.

Conclusion: The magnitude of reduction in ED was found to be higher than the quantitative image quality; however, the impact of this change on diagnosis should be analyzed according to the imaging purpose.

使用牙科CBCT设备进行头颈部成像:360°和180°旋转角度在幻象研究中有效剂量和定量图像质量的比较。
目的:本研究旨在探讨全旋转角度和半旋转角度对头颈部CBCT成像中患者辐射剂量和定量图像质量的影响。方法:采用67个tld对人体测量体头颈部16个不同区域进行剂量测定。Hyperion X9 Pro (MyRay, Cefla, Imola, Italy) CBCT装置使用90 kV脉冲光束和13x16e视场大小。测试两种独立成像模式(Regular 360和Quick 180),并通过软件确定mA。有效剂量是根据ICRP 103(2007)推荐的系数计算的。为了进行定量图像质量测试,分别从两个体积的下颌骨、上颌骨和副鼻窦区域的图像切片中为三个单独的密度手动选择三个voi。对像素值进行平均,并进行信噪比(SNR)、噪声对比比(CNR)和均匀性测试。结果:360年,ED计算值为1.903 mSv,口腔黏膜吸收剂量最高,为1.566 mSv。1980年,计算ED为1.123 mSv,右侧颞鳞状区吸收剂量最高(0.984 mSv)。在全旋转角度和半旋转角度下,ED减少41%。SNR和CNR的快速/常规比值在0.83-0.91之间变化。结论:ED的减少幅度大于定量成像质量;然而,这种变化对诊断的影响应根据影像学目的进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
246
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Medical Imaging Reviews publishes frontier review articles, original research articles, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited thematic issues on all the latest advances on medical imaging dedicated to clinical research. All relevant areas are covered by the journal, including advances in the diagnosis, instrumentation and therapeutic applications related to all modern medical imaging techniques. The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers involved in medical imaging and diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信