Proof of concept and design of an externally controlled trial for patients with gastro-enteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas based on the randomized phase II BEVANEC trial.

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
S Ganame, T Walter, A Durand, A Lièvre, D Tougeron, J-Y Scoazec, E Baudin, C Lepage, O Boussari, J Hadoux
{"title":"Proof of concept and design of an externally controlled trial for patients with gastro-enteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas based on the randomized phase II BEVANEC trial.","authors":"S Ganame, T Walter, A Durand, A Lièvre, D Tougeron, J-Y Scoazec, E Baudin, C Lepage, O Boussari, J Hadoux","doi":"10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Randomized trials are very challenging to perform in rare cancers such as gastro-enteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas. We hypothesized that the randomized BEVANEC trial of FOLFIRI + /- bevacizumab could have been designed with an external control arm (ECA) and led to similar results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this proof of concept, BEVANEC-EMU was emulated as a prospective single experimental arm (EA) trial of FOLFIRI + bevacizumab (BEVANEC data) vs an ECA of FOLFIRI from real world data (RWD) with similar inclusion criteria and primary endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RWD characteristics were similar to those of BEVANEC. Missing data were observed for some patients in RWD (LDH, PAL and performance status). After weighting by the inverse of propensity-score, patient's characteristics were as well balanced between the ECA -n = 66) and the EA of BEVANEC-EMU (n = 59) as between the 2 randomized arm of BEVANEC trial. The 6-months OS rates were 61.1 % [95 %CI 48.9;76.5] in the EA and 53.4 % [95 %CI 42.2;67.6] in the ECA. In BEVANEC-EMU, the primary endpoint was met in both arms, as observed in the BEVANEC trial. The same conclusions were drawn when a hybrid ECA (generated by a mixture of RWD and prospective data from BEVANEC). A custom randomization algorithm which incrementally incorporate RWD into a prospective comparative externally controlled trial is described.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BEVANEC trial could have been led as an externally-controlled trial. This proof of concept led to the design of REWENEC-01, a funded prospective comparative externally-controlled trial for the evaluation of an immunotherapy combination in association with FOLFIRI in GEP NEC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11980,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"115450"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115450","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Randomized trials are very challenging to perform in rare cancers such as gastro-enteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas. We hypothesized that the randomized BEVANEC trial of FOLFIRI + /- bevacizumab could have been designed with an external control arm (ECA) and led to similar results.

Methods: For this proof of concept, BEVANEC-EMU was emulated as a prospective single experimental arm (EA) trial of FOLFIRI + bevacizumab (BEVANEC data) vs an ECA of FOLFIRI from real world data (RWD) with similar inclusion criteria and primary endpoints.

Results: RWD characteristics were similar to those of BEVANEC. Missing data were observed for some patients in RWD (LDH, PAL and performance status). After weighting by the inverse of propensity-score, patient's characteristics were as well balanced between the ECA -n = 66) and the EA of BEVANEC-EMU (n = 59) as between the 2 randomized arm of BEVANEC trial. The 6-months OS rates were 61.1 % [95 %CI 48.9;76.5] in the EA and 53.4 % [95 %CI 42.2;67.6] in the ECA. In BEVANEC-EMU, the primary endpoint was met in both arms, as observed in the BEVANEC trial. The same conclusions were drawn when a hybrid ECA (generated by a mixture of RWD and prospective data from BEVANEC). A custom randomization algorithm which incrementally incorporate RWD into a prospective comparative externally controlled trial is described.

Conclusions: The BEVANEC trial could have been led as an externally-controlled trial. This proof of concept led to the design of REWENEC-01, a funded prospective comparative externally-controlled trial for the evaluation of an immunotherapy combination in association with FOLFIRI in GEP NEC patients.

基于随机II期BEVANEC试验的胃-肠胰腺神经内分泌癌患者外部对照试验的概念和设计证明。
目的:在胃-肠-胰神经内分泌癌等罕见癌症中进行随机试验是非常具有挑战性的。我们假设FOLFIRI + /-贝伐单抗的随机BEVANEC试验可能设计了一个外部对照臂(ECA),并导致类似的结果。方法:为了验证这一概念,BEVANEC- emu被模拟为FOLFIRI + 贝伐单抗(BEVANEC数据)与来自现实世界数据(RWD)的FOLFIRI ECA的前瞻性单实验组(EA)试验,具有相似的纳入标准和主要终点。结果:RWD特征与BEVANEC相似。部分RWD患者(LDH、PAL和运动状态)数据缺失。通过倾向评分逆加权后,患者的特征在BEVANEC- emu的ECA -n = 66)和EA (n = 59)之间以及BEVANEC试验的2个随机组之间得到了很好的平衡。EA组的6个月OS率为61.1%[95 %CI 48.9;76.5], ECA组为53.4%[95 %CI 42.2;67.6]。在BEVANEC- emu中,正如在BEVANEC试验中观察到的那样,两个组的主要终点都达到了。当使用混合ECA(由RWD和BEVANEC的前瞻性数据混合生成)时,得出了相同的结论。描述了一种自定义随机化算法,该算法将RWD逐步纳入前瞻性比较外部对照试验。结论:BEVANEC试验可以作为一项外部对照试验。这一概念验证导致了REWENEC-01的设计,这是一项资助的前瞻性比较外部对照试验,用于评估GEP NEC患者中与FOLFIRI相关的免疫治疗组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Cancer
European Journal of Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
953
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Cancer (EJC) serves as a comprehensive platform integrating preclinical, digital, translational, and clinical research across the spectrum of cancer. From epidemiology, carcinogenesis, and biology to groundbreaking innovations in cancer treatment and patient care, the journal covers a wide array of topics. We publish original research, reviews, previews, editorial comments, and correspondence, fostering dialogue and advancement in the fight against cancer. Join us in our mission to drive progress and improve outcomes in cancer research and patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信