Application Study of Virtual Simulation System for Preclinical Cavity Preparation Training.

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Silei Lv, Mengting Duan, Wei Fan
{"title":"Application Study of Virtual Simulation System for Preclinical Cavity Preparation Training.","authors":"Silei Lv, Mengting Duan, Wei Fan","doi":"10.1111/eje.13110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The virtual simulation system (VSS) is a new type of preclinical trainer that has unique advantages compared with traditional manikin system (TMS). The objective of this study was to compare the impact of the order of VSS and TMS training and to evaluate the potential of VSS in preclinical cavity preparation training for undergraduates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The participants (n = 97) were randomly assigned to two groups and subjected to VSS and TMS in different sequences for G. V. Black Class I, II and V cavity preparations; one group was first prepared with VSS followed by TMS (VM group), while the other group was prepared with TMS followed by VSS (MV group). The scores of the two groups were compared based on the different training orders and cavity types. Subsequently, two questionnaires were sent to all participants to further assess their views on the usage of VSS and their efficacy in preclinical training.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The training results of the VSS showed that the MV group had a higher average score than the VM group, but had no significant difference except for the Class II cavity preparation. Moreover, for the TMS training results, although the VM group generally scored higher than the MV group did, there was no significant difference between the two groups. In addition, the majority of participants agreed that the VSS was more difficult to operate than the TMS and that the VSS should be arranged before the TMS, and nearly 90% of participants were willing to use VSS for preclinical training in future experimental courses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Introducing VSS in preclinical dental training is promising as it overcomes some of the drawbacks of TMS. It allows for repeated practice while avoiding accidental injuries, contamination, evaluation bias and material waste, and can also enhance the proficiency and operation accuracy of students. Moreover, VSS training was favoured to be arranged before the TMS training. A thorough VR simulation curriculum design is necessary to help dental students better adapt to virtual simulation systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":50488,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.13110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The virtual simulation system (VSS) is a new type of preclinical trainer that has unique advantages compared with traditional manikin system (TMS). The objective of this study was to compare the impact of the order of VSS and TMS training and to evaluate the potential of VSS in preclinical cavity preparation training for undergraduates.

Methods: The participants (n = 97) were randomly assigned to two groups and subjected to VSS and TMS in different sequences for G. V. Black Class I, II and V cavity preparations; one group was first prepared with VSS followed by TMS (VM group), while the other group was prepared with TMS followed by VSS (MV group). The scores of the two groups were compared based on the different training orders and cavity types. Subsequently, two questionnaires were sent to all participants to further assess their views on the usage of VSS and their efficacy in preclinical training.

Result: The training results of the VSS showed that the MV group had a higher average score than the VM group, but had no significant difference except for the Class II cavity preparation. Moreover, for the TMS training results, although the VM group generally scored higher than the MV group did, there was no significant difference between the two groups. In addition, the majority of participants agreed that the VSS was more difficult to operate than the TMS and that the VSS should be arranged before the TMS, and nearly 90% of participants were willing to use VSS for preclinical training in future experimental courses.

Conclusions: Introducing VSS in preclinical dental training is promising as it overcomes some of the drawbacks of TMS. It allows for repeated practice while avoiding accidental injuries, contamination, evaluation bias and material waste, and can also enhance the proficiency and operation accuracy of students. Moreover, VSS training was favoured to be arranged before the TMS training. A thorough VR simulation curriculum design is necessary to help dental students better adapt to virtual simulation systems.

虚拟仿真系统在临床前空腔预备训练中的应用研究。
目的:虚拟仿真系统(VSS)是一种新型的临床前培训师,与传统的人体模型系统(TMS)相比具有独特的优势。本研究的目的是比较VSS和TMS训练顺序的影响,并评估VSS在大学生临床前空腔准备训练中的潜力。方法:将97名受试者随机分为两组,分别采用不同顺序的VSS和TMS进行G. V. Black类I、II和V类腔制剂;一组先用VSS + TMS制备(VM组),另一组先用TMS + VSS制备(MV组)。根据不同的训练顺序和空腔类型,比较两组的得分。随后,向所有参与者发送了两份问卷,以进一步评估他们对VSS的使用及其在临床前培训中的效果的看法。结果:VSS的训练结果显示,MV组的平均得分高于VM组,但除二类空腔准备外,无显著差异。此外,对于经颅磁刺激训练结果,虽然VM组的得分普遍高于MV组,但两组之间没有显著差异。此外,大多数参与者认为VSS比经颅磁刺激更难操作,应该在经颅磁刺激之前安排VSS,近90%的参与者愿意在未来的实验课中使用VSS进行临床前训练。结论:在临床前牙科培训中引入VSS是有希望的,因为它克服了TMS的一些缺点。可以重复练习,避免意外伤害、污染、评价偏差和材料浪费,也可以提高学生的熟练程度和操作准确性。此外,VSS培训更倾向于安排在TMS培训之前。为了帮助牙科学生更好地适应虚拟仿真系统,有必要进行全面的虚拟现实仿真课程设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the European Journal of Dental Education is to publish original topical and review articles of the highest quality in the field of Dental Education. The Journal seeks to disseminate widely the latest information on curriculum development teaching methodologies assessment techniques and quality assurance in the fields of dental undergraduate and postgraduate education and dental auxiliary personnel training. The scope includes the dental educational aspects of the basic medical sciences the behavioural sciences the interface with medical education information technology and distance learning and educational audit. Papers embodying the results of high-quality educational research of relevance to dentistry are particularly encouraged as are evidence-based reports of novel and established educational programmes and their outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信