{"title":"The Effect of Dialect and Accent on Digit Perception in Noise in Young Listeners With Normal Hearing.","authors":"Shangqiguo Wang, Lena L N Wong, Xiaoli Shen","doi":"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Dialect and accent factors can impact speech-in-noise testing outcomes. This study investigated these effects on the Integrated Digit-in-Noise (iDIN) test among young adults with normal hearing.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Dialects involve variations in grammar, vocabulary, and syntax, while accents influence only pronunciation, reflecting geographical or social origins. In Study 1, which examined dialect effects, 33 participants-all native speakers of Mandarin and various Wu dialects except Ningboese-underwent iDIN testing in both Ningboese and Mandarin (as a reference condition). In Study 2, which focused on accent effects, 39 participants-all native speakers of Mandarin and Ningboese, including 19 standard Ningboese and 20 accented Ningboese speakers -underwent iDIN testing in both Mandarin and standard Ningboese at fixed signal-to-noise ratio and adaptive measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Study 1, the results revealed statistically significant differences between the Mandarin and Ningboese iDIN results across all conditions except for the 2-digit sequences. In Study 2, the results showed no significant differences in 3-digit SRTs between standard and accented Ningboese speakers, but a significant difference in 5-digit SRTs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Mainland China or other regions with high linguistic diversity, accounting for dialect and accent exposure is crucial in evaluating speech recognition, and a 2-digit DIN may be more suitable for valid hearing screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":51254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","volume":"68 5","pages":"2584-2596"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00472","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Dialect and accent factors can impact speech-in-noise testing outcomes. This study investigated these effects on the Integrated Digit-in-Noise (iDIN) test among young adults with normal hearing.
Method: Dialects involve variations in grammar, vocabulary, and syntax, while accents influence only pronunciation, reflecting geographical or social origins. In Study 1, which examined dialect effects, 33 participants-all native speakers of Mandarin and various Wu dialects except Ningboese-underwent iDIN testing in both Ningboese and Mandarin (as a reference condition). In Study 2, which focused on accent effects, 39 participants-all native speakers of Mandarin and Ningboese, including 19 standard Ningboese and 20 accented Ningboese speakers -underwent iDIN testing in both Mandarin and standard Ningboese at fixed signal-to-noise ratio and adaptive measurements.
Results: In Study 1, the results revealed statistically significant differences between the Mandarin and Ningboese iDIN results across all conditions except for the 2-digit sequences. In Study 2, the results showed no significant differences in 3-digit SRTs between standard and accented Ningboese speakers, but a significant difference in 5-digit SRTs.
Conclusions: In Mainland China or other regions with high linguistic diversity, accounting for dialect and accent exposure is crucial in evaluating speech recognition, and a 2-digit DIN may be more suitable for valid hearing screening.
期刊介绍:
Mission: JSLHR publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on the normal and disordered processes in speech, language, hearing, and related areas such as cognition, oral-motor function, and swallowing. The journal is an international outlet for both basic research on communication processes and clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, and management of communication disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. JSLHR seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of communication sciences and disorders, including speech production and perception; anatomy and physiology of speech and voice; genetics, biomechanics, and other basic sciences pertaining to human communication; mastication and swallowing; speech disorders; voice disorders; development of speech, language, or hearing in children; normal language processes; language disorders; disorders of hearing and balance; psychoacoustics; and anatomy and physiology of hearing.