Pragmatic O-Positive Whole-blood RandoMizaTion in male trauma Patients (POWeR-MTP).

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Anthony M Strada, Gus Suarez, Xian Luo-Owen, Maryam B Tabrizi, Martin G Rosenthal, Wesley T Stevens, Sharon S Lum, Kaushik Mukherjee
{"title":"Pragmatic O-Positive Whole-blood RandoMizaTion in male trauma Patients (POWeR-MTP).","authors":"Anthony M Strada, Gus Suarez, Xian Luo-Owen, Maryam B Tabrizi, Martin G Rosenthal, Wesley T Stevens, Sharon S Lum, Kaushik Mukherjee","doi":"10.1007/s00068-025-02848-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Hemorrhage is a significant cause of trauma-related death. Low-titer O-positive whole blood (LTOWB) is an alternative to component therapy (CT) [packed red blood cells (PRBC) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP)]. We evaluated if LTOWB reduces transfusion requirement or mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult male trauma activations requiring uncrossmatched transfusion in the emergency department underwent nonblinded 24-hour block randomization to receive uncrossmatched LTOWB or CT in the emergency department (ED). Female patients, children, and known prisoners were excluded. If LTOWB was not available, CT was used. Primary outcome was transfusion requirement in patients surviving ≥ 24 h, with a subset analysis for patients undergoing hemorrhage control interventions (HCI). Dichotomous variables were evaluated with Chi-Square testing and continuous outcomes with Student's T-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 199 patients were randomized (52 LTOWB, 147 CT); 36 patients (12 LTOWB, 24 CT) were excluded post-randomization for mortality within 24 h. The remaining 40 LTOWB and 123 CT patient cohorts had similar age, Glasgow Coma Scale, Injury Severity Score, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and temperature. LTOWB patients received 1.4 ± 0.75 LTOWB units. LTOWB patients trended toward less transfusion (PRBC [3.8 ± 5.6 vs. 5.7 ± 6.2 units, p = 0.077], FFP [2.3 ± 3.8 vs. 3.5 ± 4.3 units, p = 0.088], and CRYO [0.13 ± 0.34 vs. 0.28 ± 0.68 units, p = 0.061]). Mortality was similar (LTOWB:10.2% [4/39] vs. CT:10.5% [13/123], p = 0.956). LTOWB patients undergoing HCI had less transfusion than CT patients (PRBC [3.9 ± 5.1 vs. 7.4 ± 7.2 units, p = 0.013]; in the HCI cohort the differences were even more pronounced when severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) deaths were excluded (PRBC [3.0 ± 3.6 vs. 7.4 ± 7.2 units, p < 0.001], FFP [2.1 ± 2.3 vs. 4.5 ± 5.2 units, p = 0.005]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LTOWB is associated with reduced PRBC transfusion in patients undergoing HCI, and a trend toward decreased PRBC, FFP, and CRYO transfusion in all patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05081063), posted 10/18/2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"175"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12003594/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-025-02848-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Hemorrhage is a significant cause of trauma-related death. Low-titer O-positive whole blood (LTOWB) is an alternative to component therapy (CT) [packed red blood cells (PRBC) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP)]. We evaluated if LTOWB reduces transfusion requirement or mortality.

Methods: Adult male trauma activations requiring uncrossmatched transfusion in the emergency department underwent nonblinded 24-hour block randomization to receive uncrossmatched LTOWB or CT in the emergency department (ED). Female patients, children, and known prisoners were excluded. If LTOWB was not available, CT was used. Primary outcome was transfusion requirement in patients surviving ≥ 24 h, with a subset analysis for patients undergoing hemorrhage control interventions (HCI). Dichotomous variables were evaluated with Chi-Square testing and continuous outcomes with Student's T-test.

Results: Overall, 199 patients were randomized (52 LTOWB, 147 CT); 36 patients (12 LTOWB, 24 CT) were excluded post-randomization for mortality within 24 h. The remaining 40 LTOWB and 123 CT patient cohorts had similar age, Glasgow Coma Scale, Injury Severity Score, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and temperature. LTOWB patients received 1.4 ± 0.75 LTOWB units. LTOWB patients trended toward less transfusion (PRBC [3.8 ± 5.6 vs. 5.7 ± 6.2 units, p = 0.077], FFP [2.3 ± 3.8 vs. 3.5 ± 4.3 units, p = 0.088], and CRYO [0.13 ± 0.34 vs. 0.28 ± 0.68 units, p = 0.061]). Mortality was similar (LTOWB:10.2% [4/39] vs. CT:10.5% [13/123], p = 0.956). LTOWB patients undergoing HCI had less transfusion than CT patients (PRBC [3.9 ± 5.1 vs. 7.4 ± 7.2 units, p = 0.013]; in the HCI cohort the differences were even more pronounced when severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) deaths were excluded (PRBC [3.0 ± 3.6 vs. 7.4 ± 7.2 units, p < 0.001], FFP [2.1 ± 2.3 vs. 4.5 ± 5.2 units, p = 0.005]).

Conclusion: LTOWB is associated with reduced PRBC transfusion in patients undergoing HCI, and a trend toward decreased PRBC, FFP, and CRYO transfusion in all patients.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05081063), posted 10/18/2021.

男性创伤患者的实用o阳性全血随机化(POWeR-MTP)。
目的:出血是外伤性死亡的重要原因。低滴度o阳性全血(LTOWB)是替代成分治疗(CT)[填充红细胞(PRBC)和新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)]的方法。我们评估了LTOWB是否降低了输血需求或死亡率。方法:在急诊科需要非交叉匹配输血的成年男性创伤激活患者进行非盲24小时块随机分组,在急诊科(ED)接受非交叉匹配的LTOWB或CT。女性病人、儿童和已知的囚犯被排除在外。如果没有LTOWB,则使用CT。主要结局是存活≥24小时的患者输血需求,并对接受出血控制干预(HCI)的患者进行亚组分析。二分类变量用卡方检验评估,连续结果用学生t检验评估。结果:199例患者被随机分组(52例LTOWB, 147例CT);36例患者(12例LTOWB, 24例CT)在随机化后24小时内的死亡率被排除。其余40例LTOWB和123例CT患者队列具有相似的年龄,格拉斯哥昏迷量表,损伤严重程度评分,心率,收缩压和温度。LTOWB患者给予1.4±0.75 LTOWB单位。LTOWB患者倾向于较少输血(PRBC[3.8±5.6比5.7±6.2单位,p = 0.077], FFP[2.3±3.8比3.5±4.3单位,p = 0.088], CRYO[0.13±0.34比0.28±0.68单位,p = 0.061])。死亡率相似(LTOWB:10.2% [4/39] vs. CT:10.5% [13/123], p = 0.956)。接受HCI的LTOWB患者输血少于CT患者(PRBC[3.9±5.1比7.4±7.2单位,p = 0.013];在HCI队列中,当排除严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)死亡时,差异更加明显(PRBC[3.0±3.6比7.4±7.2单位,p)。结论:LTOWB与HCI患者PRBC输注减少有关,并且在所有患者中PRBC、FFP和CRYO输注均有减少的趋势。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05081063),发布日期为2021年10月18日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信