Treatment outcomes for equine osteoarthritis with mesenchymal stromal cells and hyaluronic acid.

IF 2.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Rodrigo Munevar Luque, Bri Henderson, Terence Connor McCorkell, Amir Hamed Alizadeh, Keith A Russell, Thomas G Koch, Judith Koenig
{"title":"Treatment outcomes for equine osteoarthritis with mesenchymal stromal cells and hyaluronic acid.","authors":"Rodrigo Munevar Luque, Bri Henderson, Terence Connor McCorkell, Amir Hamed Alizadeh, Keith A Russell, Thomas G Koch, Judith Koenig","doi":"10.1111/evj.14531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are widely used to treat osteoarthritis (OA). Optimising dose, timing, and safety while comparing efficacy with standard therapies like hyaluronic acid (HA) is essential for their standardisation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the safety and efficacy of equine umbilical cord-derived (eCB) MSCs in client-owned horses with fetlock or carpus OA.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective single-blinded randomised clinical study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Horses diagnosed with fetlock or carpus OA via intra-articular (IA) anaesthesia were randomly assigned to receive either 10 or 20 million eCB-MSCs in HA or 3 mL of HA alone (control). Subjective lameness examinations were performed at baseline, 3 weeks, and 6 weeks post-treatment. Adverse reactions were evaluated 24-72 h post-injection. Follow-up surveys were sent to owners at 18 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven client-owned horses were enrolled. No significant adverse reactions occurred. Lameness outcomes did not differ significantly between treatment groups at 3 or 6 weeks (p > 0.05), though all groups showed improvement over time (p < 0.05). Median lameness change at 6 weeks was -1.5 (0.5) grades for HA, -2.0 (1.0) for 10-MSC + HA, and -2.0 (1.0) for 20-MSC + HA. Although return-to-work rates were not significantly different (p > 0.05), both MSC + HA groups had higher return rates to the same or higher work levels than HA-only (8 out of 9, 7 out of 9, and 5 out of 9, respectively).</p><p><strong>Main limitations: </strong>Small sample size.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study aimed to assess MSC treatment safety and efficacy. Higher return-to-exercise rates were expected in the MSC groups at 18 weeks, but unexpectedly high rates in the HA group may have led to underpowering. A post hoc calculation suggests 30 horses per group would be needed to detect significant differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":11796,"journal":{"name":"Equine Veterinary Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equine Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.14531","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are widely used to treat osteoarthritis (OA). Optimising dose, timing, and safety while comparing efficacy with standard therapies like hyaluronic acid (HA) is essential for their standardisation.

Objectives: To assess the safety and efficacy of equine umbilical cord-derived (eCB) MSCs in client-owned horses with fetlock or carpus OA.

Study design: Prospective single-blinded randomised clinical study.

Methods: Horses diagnosed with fetlock or carpus OA via intra-articular (IA) anaesthesia were randomly assigned to receive either 10 or 20 million eCB-MSCs in HA or 3 mL of HA alone (control). Subjective lameness examinations were performed at baseline, 3 weeks, and 6 weeks post-treatment. Adverse reactions were evaluated 24-72 h post-injection. Follow-up surveys were sent to owners at 18 weeks.

Results: Twenty-seven client-owned horses were enrolled. No significant adverse reactions occurred. Lameness outcomes did not differ significantly between treatment groups at 3 or 6 weeks (p > 0.05), though all groups showed improvement over time (p < 0.05). Median lameness change at 6 weeks was -1.5 (0.5) grades for HA, -2.0 (1.0) for 10-MSC + HA, and -2.0 (1.0) for 20-MSC + HA. Although return-to-work rates were not significantly different (p > 0.05), both MSC + HA groups had higher return rates to the same or higher work levels than HA-only (8 out of 9, 7 out of 9, and 5 out of 9, respectively).

Main limitations: Small sample size.

Conclusions: The study aimed to assess MSC treatment safety and efficacy. Higher return-to-exercise rates were expected in the MSC groups at 18 weeks, but unexpectedly high rates in the HA group may have led to underpowering. A post hoc calculation suggests 30 horses per group would be needed to detect significant differences.

间充质间质细胞和透明质酸治疗马骨关节炎的疗效。
背景:间充质间质细胞(MSCs)被广泛用于治疗骨关节炎(OA)。优化剂量、时间和安全性,同时与透明质酸(HA)等标准疗法的疗效进行比较,对其标准化至关重要。目的:评估马脐带来源(eCB)间质干细胞在客户拥有的马的马蹄骨或腕骨OA中的安全性和有效性。研究设计:前瞻性单盲随机临床研究。方法:通过关节内(IA)麻醉诊断为脚锁或腕骨OA的马随机分配接受1000万或2000万eCB-MSCs的HA或单独接受3ml HA(对照组)。在基线、治疗后3周和6周进行主观跛行检查。注射后24-72 h评价不良反应。在18周时向饲主发送后续调查。结果:27匹客户拥有的马被纳入。未发生明显不良反应。在3周或6周时,跛行结果在治疗组之间没有显着差异(p > 0.05),尽管所有组都随着时间的推移而改善(p 0.05), MSC + HA组与仅HA组相比,具有更高的相同或更高的工作水平的回复率(9 / 8,9 / 7和9 / 5)。主要局限性:样本量小。结论:本研究旨在评估MSC治疗的安全性和有效性。在18周时,MSC组的恢复运动率预计会更高,但HA组的高恢复运动率可能会导致动力不足。事后计算表明,每组需要30匹马才能发现显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Equine Veterinary Journal
Equine Veterinary Journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Equine Veterinary Journal publishes evidence to improve clinical practice or expand scientific knowledge underpinning equine veterinary medicine. This unrivalled international scientific journal is published 6 times per year, containing peer-reviewed articles with original and potentially important findings. Contributions are received from sources worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信