Self-reported shoulder pain assessment in adults with spinal cord injury who use a manual wheelchair: A scoping review.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Wendy Hurd, Meegan Van Straaten, Saloni Patel, Alison Hansen, Omid Jahanian, Stephen Cain, Ryan Pontiff, Chih-Ying Li, Melissa Morrow
{"title":"Self-reported shoulder pain assessment in adults with spinal cord injury who use a manual wheelchair: A scoping review.","authors":"Wendy Hurd, Meegan Van Straaten, Saloni Patel, Alison Hansen, Omid Jahanian, Stephen Cain, Ryan Pontiff, Chih-Ying Li, Melissa Morrow","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2025.2483075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>For individuals living with spinal cord injury (SCI), a deep understanding of their shoulder pain experience is crucial to guide equipment prescription/design, mobility training, exercise, recreation, and pain education. Standardization in pain assessment methods is necessary for cross-study comparisons and meta-analyses. No previous studies describe the spectrum of shoulder pain assessment measures applied to adults with SCI who use MWCs for mobility.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aimed to determine the measurement instruments and methods of shoulder pain assessment used in peer-reviewed, published literature in studies focused on individuals with SCI who use MWCs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was performed using multiple databases on February 23, 2023. Data extraction elements included study design type, inclusion/exclusion criteria, sample size, and pain measurement instrument. Participant characteristics were also extracted including age, sex, time since SCI, level of SCI, and MWC use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This scoping review identified over 20 instruments used in 133 studies that focused on reported shoulder pain in studies of this population. Thirty percent of the studies performed shoulder pain assessment for more than one purpose (screening, baseline, outcome), and 56% used more than one assessment measurement. The Wheelchair Users Shoulder Pain Index was the most commonly used instrument.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An in-depth understanding of pain requires measurement within a biopsychosocial framework and likely involves multiple instruments. Overall, investigators are challenged to select valid, reliable instruments that fulfill the demands of study design and questions of interest. Guiding questions are provided to assist investigators in their choice of pain instruments.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2025.2483075","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: For individuals living with spinal cord injury (SCI), a deep understanding of their shoulder pain experience is crucial to guide equipment prescription/design, mobility training, exercise, recreation, and pain education. Standardization in pain assessment methods is necessary for cross-study comparisons and meta-analyses. No previous studies describe the spectrum of shoulder pain assessment measures applied to adults with SCI who use MWCs for mobility.

Objective: This scoping review aimed to determine the measurement instruments and methods of shoulder pain assessment used in peer-reviewed, published literature in studies focused on individuals with SCI who use MWCs.

Methods: A literature search was performed using multiple databases on February 23, 2023. Data extraction elements included study design type, inclusion/exclusion criteria, sample size, and pain measurement instrument. Participant characteristics were also extracted including age, sex, time since SCI, level of SCI, and MWC use.

Results: This scoping review identified over 20 instruments used in 133 studies that focused on reported shoulder pain in studies of this population. Thirty percent of the studies performed shoulder pain assessment for more than one purpose (screening, baseline, outcome), and 56% used more than one assessment measurement. The Wheelchair Users Shoulder Pain Index was the most commonly used instrument.

Conclusion: An in-depth understanding of pain requires measurement within a biopsychosocial framework and likely involves multiple instruments. Overall, investigators are challenged to select valid, reliable instruments that fulfill the demands of study design and questions of interest. Guiding questions are provided to assist investigators in their choice of pain instruments.

使用手动轮椅的脊髓损伤成人自我报告肩痛评估:范围审查。
背景:对于患有脊髓损伤(SCI)的个体,深入了解他们的肩部疼痛经历对于指导设备处方/设计、活动训练、运动、娱乐和疼痛教育至关重要。疼痛评估方法的标准化对于交叉研究比较和荟萃分析是必要的。以前没有研究描述肩关节疼痛评估方法适用于使用mwc进行活动的成年脊髓损伤患者。目的:本综述旨在确定同行评议的已发表文献中使用mwc的SCI患者肩痛评估的测量工具和方法。方法:于2023年2月23日在多个数据库进行文献检索。数据提取要素包括研究设计类型、纳入/排除标准、样本量和疼痛测量工具。还提取了参与者的特征,包括年龄、性别、SCI发生时间、SCI水平和MWC使用情况。结果:本综述确定了133项研究中使用的20多种器械,这些研究集中在该人群的肩部疼痛研究中。30%的研究对肩部疼痛进行了不止一个目的的评估(筛查、基线、结果),56%的研究使用了不止一个评估测量。轮椅使用者肩痛指数是最常用的测量工具。结论:深入了解疼痛需要在生物心理社会框架内进行测量,可能涉及多种工具。总的来说,研究者面临的挑战是选择有效、可靠的工具,以满足研究设计和感兴趣的问题的要求。提供指导性问题,以协助调查人员在他们的选择疼痛工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信