Why Do Emergency Medical Service Employees (Not) Seek Organizational Help for Mental Health Support?: A Systematic Review.

3区 综合性期刊
Sasha Johnston, Polly Waite, Jasmine Laing, Layla Rashid, Abbie Wilkins, Chloe Hooper, Elizabeth Hindhaugh, Jennifer Wild
{"title":"Why Do Emergency Medical Service Employees (Not) Seek Organizational Help for Mental Health Support?: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Sasha Johnston, Polly Waite, Jasmine Laing, Layla Rashid, Abbie Wilkins, Chloe Hooper, Elizabeth Hindhaugh, Jennifer Wild","doi":"10.3390/ijerph22040629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emergency medical service (EMS) ambulance employees play a critical role in emergency healthcare delivery. However, work-related experiences can compromise their mental health and job satisfaction. Despite available supportive services offered by EMS organizations, employee uptake remains low, while mental ill health and suicide rates remain higher than those of the general population. Understanding barriers to and enablers of such support is crucial for addressing factors that connect employees with the services designed to help. This systematic review identified 34 relevant articles and utilized an innovative process of integrating quantitative and qualitative aspects of the primary and gray literature to provide a qualitative synthesis of barriers and facilitators as perceived by EMS employees. Themes of employee (in)ability to ask for help, tailored person-centered support, and education and training about mental health were overarched by organizational culture. Barriers included perceived organizational obligation rather than genuine care, alongside machismo and stigma. Enablers included valuing and acknowledging employee risk by providing time and normalizing support utilization at work. Reframing machismo from dominance, competition, and toughness to respect, perseverance, and courage; promoting adaptive coping; and providing time and training were essential. Future research should aim to understand the factors influencing employee utilization of supportive interventions based on these themes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49056,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","volume":"22 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12027444/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22040629","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emergency medical service (EMS) ambulance employees play a critical role in emergency healthcare delivery. However, work-related experiences can compromise their mental health and job satisfaction. Despite available supportive services offered by EMS organizations, employee uptake remains low, while mental ill health and suicide rates remain higher than those of the general population. Understanding barriers to and enablers of such support is crucial for addressing factors that connect employees with the services designed to help. This systematic review identified 34 relevant articles and utilized an innovative process of integrating quantitative and qualitative aspects of the primary and gray literature to provide a qualitative synthesis of barriers and facilitators as perceived by EMS employees. Themes of employee (in)ability to ask for help, tailored person-centered support, and education and training about mental health were overarched by organizational culture. Barriers included perceived organizational obligation rather than genuine care, alongside machismo and stigma. Enablers included valuing and acknowledging employee risk by providing time and normalizing support utilization at work. Reframing machismo from dominance, competition, and toughness to respect, perseverance, and courage; promoting adaptive coping; and providing time and training were essential. Future research should aim to understand the factors influencing employee utilization of supportive interventions based on these themes.

为什么急救医疗服务人员(不)向组织寻求心理健康支持?:系统评价。
紧急医疗服务(EMS)救护人员在紧急医疗服务中发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,与工作相关的经历会损害他们的心理健康和工作满意度。尽管紧急医疗服务组织提供了可用的支助服务,但雇员的接受程度仍然很低,而精神疾病和自杀率仍然高于一般人口。了解这种支持的障碍和促成因素对于解决将员工与旨在提供帮助的服务联系起来的因素至关重要。本系统综述确定了34篇相关文章,并采用了一种创新的方法,整合了主要文献和灰色文献的定量和定性方面,以提供EMS员工所感知的障碍和促进因素的定性综合。员工寻求帮助的能力、量身定制的以人为本的支持以及心理健康教育和培训等主题被组织文化所主导。障碍包括感知到的组织义务,而不是真正的关怀,以及大男子主义和耻辱。促成因素包括通过在工作中提供时间和规范支持利用来评估和承认员工风险。将男子气概从支配、竞争和坚韧转变为尊重、毅力和勇气;促进适应性应对;提供时间和培训是必不可少的。未来的研究应基于这些主题,旨在了解影响员工使用支持性干预的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14422
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) (ISSN 1660-4601) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes, and short communications in the interdisciplinary area of environmental health sciences and public health. It links several scientific disciplines including biology, biochemistry, biotechnology, cellular and molecular biology, chemistry, computer science, ecology, engineering, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, microbiology, oncology, pathology, pharmacology, and toxicology, in an integrated fashion, to address critical issues related to environmental quality and public health. Therefore, IJERPH focuses on the publication of scientific and technical information on the impacts of natural phenomena and anthropogenic factors on the quality of our environment, the interrelationships between environmental health and the quality of life, as well as the socio-cultural, political, economic, and legal considerations related to environmental stewardship and public health. The 2018 IJERPH Outstanding Reviewer Award has been launched! This award acknowledge those who have generously dedicated their time to review manuscripts submitted to IJERPH. See full details at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/awards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信