Acoustic Realism of Clinical Speech-in-Noise Testing: Parameter Ranges of Speech-Likeness, Interaural Coherence, and Interaural Differences.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Trends in Hearing Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-06 DOI:10.1177/23312165251336625
S Theo Goverts, Virginia Best, Julia Bouwmeester, Cas Smits, H Steven Colburn
{"title":"Acoustic Realism of Clinical Speech-in-Noise Testing: Parameter Ranges of Speech-Likeness, Interaural Coherence, and Interaural Differences.","authors":"S Theo Goverts, Virginia Best, Julia Bouwmeester, Cas Smits, H Steven Colburn","doi":"10.1177/23312165251336625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Speech-in-noise testing is a valuable component of audiological examination that can provide estimates of a listener's ability to communicate in their everyday life. It has long been recognized, however, that the acoustics of real-world environments are complex and variable and not well represented by a typical clinical test setup. The first aim of this study was to quantify real-world environments in terms of several acoustic parameters that may be relevant for speech understanding (namely speech-likeness, interaural coherence, and interaural time and level differences). Earlier acoustic analyses of binaural recordings in natural environments were extended to binaural re-creations of natural environments that included conversational speech embedded in recorded backgrounds and allowed a systematic manipulation of signal-to-noise ratio. The second aim of the study was to examine these same parameters in typical clinical speech-in-noise tests and consider the \"acoustic realism\" of such tests. We confirmed that the parameter spaces of natural environments are poorly covered by those of the most commonly used clinical test with one frontal loudspeaker. We also demonstrated that a simple variation of the clinical test, which uses two spatially separated loudspeakers to present speech and noise, leads to better coverage of the parameter spaces of natural environments. Overall, the results provide a framework for characterizing different listening environments that may guide future efforts to increase the real-world relevance of clinical speech-in-noise testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":48678,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Hearing","volume":"29 ","pages":"23312165251336625"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12059433/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23312165251336625","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Speech-in-noise testing is a valuable component of audiological examination that can provide estimates of a listener's ability to communicate in their everyday life. It has long been recognized, however, that the acoustics of real-world environments are complex and variable and not well represented by a typical clinical test setup. The first aim of this study was to quantify real-world environments in terms of several acoustic parameters that may be relevant for speech understanding (namely speech-likeness, interaural coherence, and interaural time and level differences). Earlier acoustic analyses of binaural recordings in natural environments were extended to binaural re-creations of natural environments that included conversational speech embedded in recorded backgrounds and allowed a systematic manipulation of signal-to-noise ratio. The second aim of the study was to examine these same parameters in typical clinical speech-in-noise tests and consider the "acoustic realism" of such tests. We confirmed that the parameter spaces of natural environments are poorly covered by those of the most commonly used clinical test with one frontal loudspeaker. We also demonstrated that a simple variation of the clinical test, which uses two spatially separated loudspeakers to present speech and noise, leads to better coverage of the parameter spaces of natural environments. Overall, the results provide a framework for characterizing different listening environments that may guide future efforts to increase the real-world relevance of clinical speech-in-noise testing.

临床语音噪声测试的声学真实性:语音相似、耳间连贯和耳间差异的参数范围。
噪音语音测试是听力学检查的一个有价值的组成部分,可以提供听者在日常生活中沟通能力的估计。然而,人们早就认识到,现实世界环境的声学是复杂多变的,不能用典型的临床试验装置很好地代表。本研究的第一个目的是根据可能与语音理解相关的几个声学参数(即语音相似性、耳间一致性、耳间时间和水平差异)来量化现实世界的环境。早期对自然环境中双耳录音的声学分析被扩展到自然环境的双耳再创造,其中包括嵌入在记录背景中的会话语音,并允许系统地操纵信噪比。该研究的第二个目的是在典型的临床噪音语音测试中检查这些相同的参数,并考虑此类测试的“声学真实性”。我们证实了自然环境的参数空间被那些最常用的临床测试用一个正面扬声器覆盖得很差。我们还证明了临床测试的一个简单变化,即使用两个空间分离的扬声器来呈现语音和噪声,可以更好地覆盖自然环境的参数空间。总的来说,这些结果为描述不同的听力环境提供了一个框架,可以指导未来努力提高临床噪音语音测试的现实相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trends in Hearing
Trends in Hearing AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGYOTORH-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Trends in Hearing is an open access journal completely dedicated to publishing original research and reviews focusing on human hearing, hearing loss, hearing aids, auditory implants, and aural rehabilitation. Under its former name, Trends in Amplification, the journal established itself as a forum for concise explorations of all areas of translational hearing research by leaders in the field. Trends in Hearing has now expanded its focus to include original research articles, with the goal of becoming the premier venue for research related to human hearing and hearing loss.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信