Salwa Hajir, Karl J Jobst, Sonya Kleywegt, André J Simpson, Myrna J Simpson
{"title":"Do co-solvents used in exposure studies equally perturb the metabolic profile of Daphnia magna?","authors":"Salwa Hajir, Karl J Jobst, Sonya Kleywegt, André J Simpson, Myrna J Simpson","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dissolution methods such as co-solvents are used to solubilize insoluble compounds in exposure experiments. Several exposure studies have followed the guidelines from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development where co-solvents are applied at 0.01% v/v of the total exposure volume. Although no observable apical endpoint abnormalities were reported following these guidelines, little is known about the molecular-level impacts of co-solvents used in exposure studies. A targeted metabolomics approach using liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry was used to assess Daphnia magna responses to four commonly used co-solvents, including acetone (ACT), acetonitrile (ACN), methanol (MeOH), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), at three different levels (0.01%, 0.05%, and 0.1% v/v) over 48 hr. Based on the observed metabolic disruptions, exposure to MeOH and DMSO induced higher metabolic perturbations in amino acid levels and associated biochemical pathways in comparison to ACT and ACN exposures. However, as with mixtures, when co-solvents are combined with the pollutants under investigation, there is a possibility for additive, synergistic, or antagonistic interactions. Hence, to examine the possible impairments in co-solvent and pollutant mixtures, ACT and ACN applied at 0.01% v/v were chosen to be tested with phenanthridine (PN). Daphnia magna exposure to PN dissolved in ACT had less disruptions; in contrast to PN prepared in ACN, which triggered a higher degree of antagonism in the D. magna metabolic profile. Consequently, exposing D. magna to ACT applied at 0.01% v/v resulted in the lowest metabolic perturbation in both parts of this study, suggesting that it is the least disruptive co-solvent for molecular-level exposure studies involving D. magna.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"1622-1635"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dissolution methods such as co-solvents are used to solubilize insoluble compounds in exposure experiments. Several exposure studies have followed the guidelines from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development where co-solvents are applied at 0.01% v/v of the total exposure volume. Although no observable apical endpoint abnormalities were reported following these guidelines, little is known about the molecular-level impacts of co-solvents used in exposure studies. A targeted metabolomics approach using liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry was used to assess Daphnia magna responses to four commonly used co-solvents, including acetone (ACT), acetonitrile (ACN), methanol (MeOH), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), at three different levels (0.01%, 0.05%, and 0.1% v/v) over 48 hr. Based on the observed metabolic disruptions, exposure to MeOH and DMSO induced higher metabolic perturbations in amino acid levels and associated biochemical pathways in comparison to ACT and ACN exposures. However, as with mixtures, when co-solvents are combined with the pollutants under investigation, there is a possibility for additive, synergistic, or antagonistic interactions. Hence, to examine the possible impairments in co-solvent and pollutant mixtures, ACT and ACN applied at 0.01% v/v were chosen to be tested with phenanthridine (PN). Daphnia magna exposure to PN dissolved in ACT had less disruptions; in contrast to PN prepared in ACN, which triggered a higher degree of antagonism in the D. magna metabolic profile. Consequently, exposing D. magna to ACT applied at 0.01% v/v resulted in the lowest metabolic perturbation in both parts of this study, suggesting that it is the least disruptive co-solvent for molecular-level exposure studies involving D. magna.
期刊介绍:
The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...]
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.