Narrative Discourse Intervention for Patients in Posttraumatic Amnesia: A Feasibility Study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Aashna Vazirani, Martin Checklin, Adam McKay, Dean McKenzie, Joanne Steel
{"title":"Narrative Discourse Intervention for Patients in Posttraumatic Amnesia: A Feasibility Study.","authors":"Aashna Vazirani, Martin Checklin, Adam McKay, Dean McKenzie, Joanne Steel","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recent INCOG 2.0 guidelines for posttraumatic amnesia (PTA) recommend commencing multidisciplinary functional intervention for patients who do not demonstrate severe behavioral disturbance. This pilot feasibility study aimed to determine if people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) could engage in a narrative discourse intervention during PTA.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A narrative discourse intervention was developed based on existing evidence for discourse treatment and allied health treatments with patients in PTA. The study setting was a TBI-specific facility. Participants were screened on ward admission for PTA status and received daily discourse intervention comprising a story retell with visual supports and self-generated task during PTA. Measures included the Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale (PRPS), the Agitated Behavior Scale (ABS), number of sessions attended, length of session, narrative organization, and patient enjoyment of sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten patients participated in this pilot study, in a total of 56 sessions overall. Average session duration was approximately 25 min. Participation (PRPS) scores ranged from 3 to 5 (<i>good</i> to <i>very good</i>), and agitation scores were mostly within normal limits on the ABS. Narrative samples produced with picture supports were more organized than self-generated samples. Participants reported enjoying sessions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Discourse intervention conducted in the early PTA recovery period was feasible for this cohort, within a specialized TBI setting. Future research is required to examine the feasibility of intervention with patients in PTA in other settings, and the potential efficacy of narrative discourse intervention during PTA.</p>","PeriodicalId":49240,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Recent INCOG 2.0 guidelines for posttraumatic amnesia (PTA) recommend commencing multidisciplinary functional intervention for patients who do not demonstrate severe behavioral disturbance. This pilot feasibility study aimed to determine if people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) could engage in a narrative discourse intervention during PTA.

Method: A narrative discourse intervention was developed based on existing evidence for discourse treatment and allied health treatments with patients in PTA. The study setting was a TBI-specific facility. Participants were screened on ward admission for PTA status and received daily discourse intervention comprising a story retell with visual supports and self-generated task during PTA. Measures included the Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale (PRPS), the Agitated Behavior Scale (ABS), number of sessions attended, length of session, narrative organization, and patient enjoyment of sessions.

Results: Ten patients participated in this pilot study, in a total of 56 sessions overall. Average session duration was approximately 25 min. Participation (PRPS) scores ranged from 3 to 5 (good to very good), and agitation scores were mostly within normal limits on the ABS. Narrative samples produced with picture supports were more organized than self-generated samples. Participants reported enjoying sessions.

Conclusions: Discourse intervention conducted in the early PTA recovery period was feasible for this cohort, within a specialized TBI setting. Future research is required to examine the feasibility of intervention with patients in PTA in other settings, and the potential efficacy of narrative discourse intervention during PTA.

创伤后失忆症患者叙事话语干预的可行性研究。
目的:最近的INCOG 2.0创伤后失忆症(PTA)指南建议对没有表现出严重行为障碍的患者开始多学科功能干预。本初步可行性研究旨在确定创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者在PTA期间是否可以进行叙事话语干预。方法:基于现有证据,对PTA患者进行话语治疗和相关健康治疗,开发叙事话语干预。研究环境为tbi专用设施。参与者在入院时进行PTA状态筛选,并在PTA期间接受每日话语干预,包括有视觉支持的故事复述和自生成任务。测量包括匹兹堡康复参与量表(PRPS)、激动行为量表(ABS)、参加的会议次数、会议长度、叙述组织和患者对会议的享受。结果:10名患者参与了这项初步研究,总共进行了56次治疗。平均会话持续时间约为25分钟。参与(PRPS)得分范围从3到5(好到非常好),躁动得分大多在ABS的正常范围内。有图片支持的叙事样本比自生成样本更有组织。参与者报告说他们很享受疗程。结论:在专门的TBI环境下,在PTA早期恢复期进行话语干预对该队列是可行的。未来的研究需要检验在其他环境下对PTA患者进行干预的可行性,以及PTA中叙事话语干预的潜在功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
353
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJSLP publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on all aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research pertaining to screening, detection, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of communication and swallowing disorders across the lifespan as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. Because of its clinical orientation, the journal disseminates research findings applicable to diverse aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. AJSLP seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of speech-language pathology, including aphasia; apraxia of speech and childhood apraxia of speech; aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; dysarthria; fluency disorders; language disorders in children; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; and voice disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信