A randomized controlled pilot study investigating adherence to blood pressure diaries with personal pictures in stroke follow-up care.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Clemens V Farr, Johanna Ebner, Marie Beatrice Lang, Sonja Zehetmayer, Katharina Trawnicek, Stefan Greisenegger, Wolfgang Serles, Thomas Berger, Patrick Altmann
{"title":"A randomized controlled pilot study investigating adherence to blood pressure diaries with personal pictures in stroke follow-up care.","authors":"Clemens V Farr, Johanna Ebner, Marie Beatrice Lang, Sonja Zehetmayer, Katharina Trawnicek, Stefan Greisenegger, Wolfgang Serles, Thomas Berger, Patrick Altmann","doi":"10.1007/s00508-025-02530-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Blood pressure (BP) management is essential in secondary stroke prevention. Strategies to ensure continuous home BP monitoring are needed. Few studies investigated factors influencing adherence to home BP management. Therefore, we designed a pilot study to investigate the feasibility of keeping BP diaries (BPDs) with personal images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective trial, we randomized persons with a diagnosis of stroke or transient ischemic attack into two groups: (i) 10 patients received a personalized BPD with pictures of their choosing and (ii) 10 patients received a BPD without photographs. We instructed participants in both groups to document their BP at home twice daily over 28 days. Adherence was defined as the number of BP measurements performed relative to the maximum number of recommended measurements. We assessed patient reported outcomes as exploratory endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found no statistically significant difference in mean adherence between the control group (64%) and the intervention group (69%). The BP was within the recommended range and precision of documentation was high in both groups, without statistically significant differences. Patient reported outcomes such as depression scores did not differ significantly between study groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings underline the relevance to investigate aspects of adherence to home BP management suggesting the inclusion of patient-provided pictures to be feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":23861,"journal":{"name":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-025-02530-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Blood pressure (BP) management is essential in secondary stroke prevention. Strategies to ensure continuous home BP monitoring are needed. Few studies investigated factors influencing adherence to home BP management. Therefore, we designed a pilot study to investigate the feasibility of keeping BP diaries (BPDs) with personal images.

Methods: In this prospective trial, we randomized persons with a diagnosis of stroke or transient ischemic attack into two groups: (i) 10 patients received a personalized BPD with pictures of their choosing and (ii) 10 patients received a BPD without photographs. We instructed participants in both groups to document their BP at home twice daily over 28 days. Adherence was defined as the number of BP measurements performed relative to the maximum number of recommended measurements. We assessed patient reported outcomes as exploratory endpoints.

Results: We found no statistically significant difference in mean adherence between the control group (64%) and the intervention group (69%). The BP was within the recommended range and precision of documentation was high in both groups, without statistically significant differences. Patient reported outcomes such as depression scores did not differ significantly between study groups.

Conclusion: Our findings underline the relevance to investigate aspects of adherence to home BP management suggesting the inclusion of patient-provided pictures to be feasible.

一项随机对照试验研究,调查中风随访护理中附有个人照片的血压日记的依从性。
简介:血压(BP)管理是必不可少的二级卒中预防。需要采取策略确保连续的家庭血压监测。很少有研究调查影响家庭BP治疗依从性的因素。因此,我们设计了一项试点研究,以调查用个人图像保存BP日记(bpd)的可行性。方法:在这项前瞻性试验中,我们将诊断为中风或短暂性脑缺血发作的患者随机分为两组:(i) 10名患者接受个性化的BPD,其中有他们选择的照片;(ii) 10名患者接受没有照片的BPD。我们指示两组参与者在28天内每天两次在家记录他们的血压。依从性定义为相对于推荐的最大测量次数进行的血压测量次数。我们将患者报告的结果作为探索性终点进行评估。结果:我们发现对照组(64%)和干预组(69%)的平均依从性无统计学差异。两组血压均在推荐范围内,记录精度高,差异无统计学意义。患者报告的抑郁评分等结果在研究组之间没有显著差异。结论:我们的研究结果强调了调查家庭BP管理依从性方面的相关性,表明纳入患者提供的图片是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
110
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is an international scientific medical journal covering the entire spectrum of clinical medicine and related areas such as ethics in medicine, public health and the history of medicine. In addition to original articles, the Journal features editorials and leading articles on newly emerging topics, review articles, case reports and a broad range of special articles. Experimental material will be considered for publication if it is directly relevant to clinical medicine. The number of international contributions has been steadily increasing. Consequently, the international reputation of the journal has grown in the past several years. Founded in 1888, the Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is certainly one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world and takes pride in having been the first publisher of landmarks in medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信