Jordan Kassab , Phillip Westbrook , Parth Joshi , Richard Schoor
{"title":"Comprehensive Analysis of Mail-In Andrology Kits Compared to Traditional Clinic Collection","authors":"Jordan Kassab , Phillip Westbrook , Parth Joshi , Richard Schoor","doi":"10.1016/j.urology.2025.04.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div><span>To evaluate mail-in semen collection services for </span>cryopreservation, focusing on costs, transparency, and efficacy due to the advancements of direct access to fertility testing and treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using Google, we identified eight prominent companies offering mail-in sperm cryopreservation services. We analyzed their costs, storage practices, marketing strategies, and prescription requirements. For comparison, we examined academic institutions offering similar services, exploring differences in pricing, processes, and accessibility.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The average upfront cost to process and freeze sperm was $730 (range $329 to $1575) with 10-year storage costs of $3117, on average (range $1450 to $5500), which may or may not be guaranteed to remain level. Not all services disclosed future costs such as transport, thawing, and disposal fees, with some firms being less transparent. Two firms offered client depositor storage on-site and the remainder outsourced to partner labs scattered around the country. One facility offered storage of tissue samples for men with azoospermia; none of the companies required men to have an order from their doctor to use the service.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Mail-in cryopreservation services provide convenience but present challenges, including varying costs, transparency issues, and potential limitations in medical oversight. Integrating these services into traditional healthcare settings could optimize patient outcomes and satisfaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23415,"journal":{"name":"Urology","volume":"203 ","pages":"Pages 70-75"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090429525003437","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate mail-in semen collection services for cryopreservation, focusing on costs, transparency, and efficacy due to the advancements of direct access to fertility testing and treatment.
Methods
Using Google, we identified eight prominent companies offering mail-in sperm cryopreservation services. We analyzed their costs, storage practices, marketing strategies, and prescription requirements. For comparison, we examined academic institutions offering similar services, exploring differences in pricing, processes, and accessibility.
Results
The average upfront cost to process and freeze sperm was $730 (range $329 to $1575) with 10-year storage costs of $3117, on average (range $1450 to $5500), which may or may not be guaranteed to remain level. Not all services disclosed future costs such as transport, thawing, and disposal fees, with some firms being less transparent. Two firms offered client depositor storage on-site and the remainder outsourced to partner labs scattered around the country. One facility offered storage of tissue samples for men with azoospermia; none of the companies required men to have an order from their doctor to use the service.
Conclusion
Mail-in cryopreservation services provide convenience but present challenges, including varying costs, transparency issues, and potential limitations in medical oversight. Integrating these services into traditional healthcare settings could optimize patient outcomes and satisfaction.
期刊介绍:
Urology is a monthly, peer–reviewed journal primarily for urologists, residents, interns, nephrologists, and other specialists interested in urology
The mission of Urology®, the "Gold Journal," is to provide practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers practicing the art of urology worldwide. Urology® publishes original articles relating to adult and pediatric clinical urology as well as to clinical and basic science research. Topics in Urology® include pediatrics, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, erectile dysfunction, infertility, incontinence, transplantation, endourology, andrology, female urology, reconstructive surgery, and medical oncology, as well as relevant basic science issues. Special features include rapid communication of important timely issues, surgeon''s workshops, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, clinical and basic science review articles, guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and historical articles in urology.