{"title":"Effects of mirror visual observation priming on upper extremity motor recovery after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Jinyang Zhuang, Jiali Lin, Qinying Li, Jie Jia","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.04.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the priming effects of mirror visual observation (MVO) on upper extremity (UE) motor recover after stroke.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized, controlled, observer -blinded study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Rehabilitation Medicine Department in Tertiary Hospital.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Twenty individuals with first unilateral stroke within 1 week to 6 months.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Participants were randomly divided into two groups: (1) the experimental group (EG) receiving MVO with task-oriented training (MVO+TOT); (2) the control group (CG) receiving sham MVO+TOT. The intervention consisted of 30 minutes of MVO or sham MVO, a 10-minute break, and 30 minutes of TOT daily, five days a week, for three weeks.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity Motor Function Subscale (FMA_UE). The change of FMA_UE (ΔFMA_UE) before and after the intervention was assessed for clinical significance. The secondary outcomes included grip strength, the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and the Modified Barthel Index (MBI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients completed the trial without adverse reactions. The EG had a better treatment experience than the CG. Both groups showed improvements in FMA_UE, grip strength, ARAT, and MBI scores from baseline (P<0.05 for all). Post-intervention, there were no differences between the groups in grip strength, ARAT, and MBI scores (P>0.05 for all). However, the EG showed a better improvement in FMA_UE scores compared to the CG (P=0.044). The ΔFMA_UE of both groups surpassed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The average ΔFMA_UE difference between the groups was 10.80 (95% CI: 6.31 to 15.29), exceeding the MCID with statistical significance (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MVO demonstrates a priming effect that enhances the recovery of UE motor impairments post-stroke with clinical significance.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.04.014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the priming effects of mirror visual observation (MVO) on upper extremity (UE) motor recover after stroke.
Setting: Rehabilitation Medicine Department in Tertiary Hospital.
Participants: Twenty individuals with first unilateral stroke within 1 week to 6 months.
Intervention: Participants were randomly divided into two groups: (1) the experimental group (EG) receiving MVO with task-oriented training (MVO+TOT); (2) the control group (CG) receiving sham MVO+TOT. The intervention consisted of 30 minutes of MVO or sham MVO, a 10-minute break, and 30 minutes of TOT daily, five days a week, for three weeks.
Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity Motor Function Subscale (FMA_UE). The change of FMA_UE (ΔFMA_UE) before and after the intervention was assessed for clinical significance. The secondary outcomes included grip strength, the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and the Modified Barthel Index (MBI).
Results: All patients completed the trial without adverse reactions. The EG had a better treatment experience than the CG. Both groups showed improvements in FMA_UE, grip strength, ARAT, and MBI scores from baseline (P<0.05 for all). Post-intervention, there were no differences between the groups in grip strength, ARAT, and MBI scores (P>0.05 for all). However, the EG showed a better improvement in FMA_UE scores compared to the CG (P=0.044). The ΔFMA_UE of both groups surpassed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The average ΔFMA_UE difference between the groups was 10.80 (95% CI: 6.31 to 15.29), exceeding the MCID with statistical significance (P<0.001).
Conclusions: MVO demonstrates a priming effect that enhances the recovery of UE motor impairments post-stroke with clinical significance.
期刊介绍:
The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities.
Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.