Effects of mirror visual observation priming on upper extremity motor recovery after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Jinyang Zhuang, Jiali Lin, Qinying Li, Jie Jia
{"title":"Effects of mirror visual observation priming on upper extremity motor recovery after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Jinyang Zhuang, Jiali Lin, Qinying Li, Jie Jia","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.04.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the priming effects of mirror visual observation (MVO) on upper extremity (UE) motor recover after stroke.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized, controlled, observer -blinded study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Rehabilitation Medicine Department in Tertiary Hospital.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Twenty individuals with first unilateral stroke within 1 week to 6 months.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Participants were randomly divided into two groups: (1) the experimental group (EG) receiving MVO with task-oriented training (MVO+TOT); (2) the control group (CG) receiving sham MVO+TOT. The intervention consisted of 30 minutes of MVO or sham MVO, a 10-minute break, and 30 minutes of TOT daily, five days a week, for three weeks.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity Motor Function Subscale (FMA_UE). The change of FMA_UE (ΔFMA_UE) before and after the intervention was assessed for clinical significance. The secondary outcomes included grip strength, the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and the Modified Barthel Index (MBI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients completed the trial without adverse reactions. The EG had a better treatment experience than the CG. Both groups showed improvements in FMA_UE, grip strength, ARAT, and MBI scores from baseline (P<0.05 for all). Post-intervention, there were no differences between the groups in grip strength, ARAT, and MBI scores (P>0.05 for all). However, the EG showed a better improvement in FMA_UE scores compared to the CG (P=0.044). The ΔFMA_UE of both groups surpassed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The average ΔFMA_UE difference between the groups was 10.80 (95% CI: 6.31 to 15.29), exceeding the MCID with statistical significance (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MVO demonstrates a priming effect that enhances the recovery of UE motor impairments post-stroke with clinical significance.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.04.014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the priming effects of mirror visual observation (MVO) on upper extremity (UE) motor recover after stroke.

Design: Randomized, controlled, observer -blinded study.

Setting: Rehabilitation Medicine Department in Tertiary Hospital.

Participants: Twenty individuals with first unilateral stroke within 1 week to 6 months.

Intervention: Participants were randomly divided into two groups: (1) the experimental group (EG) receiving MVO with task-oriented training (MVO+TOT); (2) the control group (CG) receiving sham MVO+TOT. The intervention consisted of 30 minutes of MVO or sham MVO, a 10-minute break, and 30 minutes of TOT daily, five days a week, for three weeks.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity Motor Function Subscale (FMA_UE). The change of FMA_UE (ΔFMA_UE) before and after the intervention was assessed for clinical significance. The secondary outcomes included grip strength, the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and the Modified Barthel Index (MBI).

Results: All patients completed the trial without adverse reactions. The EG had a better treatment experience than the CG. Both groups showed improvements in FMA_UE, grip strength, ARAT, and MBI scores from baseline (P<0.05 for all). Post-intervention, there were no differences between the groups in grip strength, ARAT, and MBI scores (P>0.05 for all). However, the EG showed a better improvement in FMA_UE scores compared to the CG (P=0.044). The ΔFMA_UE of both groups surpassed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The average ΔFMA_UE difference between the groups was 10.80 (95% CI: 6.31 to 15.29), exceeding the MCID with statistical significance (P<0.001).

Conclusions: MVO demonstrates a priming effect that enhances the recovery of UE motor impairments post-stroke with clinical significance.

镜像视觉观察启动对中风后上肢运动恢复的影响:一项先导随机对照试验。
目的:探讨镜像视觉观察(MVO)对脑卒中后上肢运动恢复的启动效应。设计:随机、对照、观察者盲法研究。单位:三级医院康复医学科。参与者:20例1周至6个月内首次单侧中风患者。干预:参与者随机分为两组:(1)实验组(EG)接受MVO+任务导向训练(MVO+TOT);(2)对照组(CG)接受假MVO+TOT治疗。干预包括30分钟的MVO或假MVO, 10分钟的休息时间,每天30分钟的TOT,每周五天,持续三周。主要观察指标:主要观察指标为Fugl-Meyer上肢运动功能量表(FMA_UE)。评估干预前后FMA_UE (ΔFMA_UE)变化的临床意义。次要结果包括握力、动作研究臂测试(ARAT)和改良Barthel指数(MBI)。结果:所有患者均完成试验,无不良反应。EG组治疗经验优于CG组。两组FMA_UE、握力、ARAT和MBI评分较基线均有改善(均P0.05)。然而,与CG相比,EG在FMA_UE评分方面表现出更好的改善(P=0.044)。两组的ΔFMA_UE均超过最小临床重要差异(MCID)。各组间平均ΔFMA_UE差异为10.80 (95% CI: 6.31 ~ 15.29),超过MCID具有统计学意义(p结论:MVO具有启动效应,可促进脑卒中后UE运动障碍的恢复,具有临床意义)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信