Gabapentin and D-cycloserine alone and in combination with naloxone in methadone-maintained humans responding under a naloxone novel-response discrimination procedure.
Lauren R Fitzgerald, Nichole C Stanley, Joseph B Guise, Christopher S Cargile, Michael J Mancino, Alison H Oliveto
{"title":"Gabapentin and D-cycloserine alone and in combination with naloxone in methadone-maintained humans responding under a naloxone novel-response discrimination procedure.","authors":"Lauren R Fitzgerald, Nichole C Stanley, Joseph B Guise, Christopher S Cargile, Michael J Mancino, Alison H Oliveto","doi":"10.1097/FBP.0000000000000823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study examined the impact of the N-type calcium channel blocker gabapentin (GBP) and the partial glycine agonist D-cycloserine (CYC) to attenuate the behavioral effects of naloxone in opioid-dependent humans responding under a naloxone discrimination procedure. Methadone-maintained participants were trained to distinguish between a low dose of naloxone (0.15 mg/70 kg, i.m.; i.e., drug A) and placebo (i.e. drug B) under an instructed novel-response drug discrimination procedure, in which participants identify the drug condition as 'A', 'B', or 'N' (neither A nor B - 'novel'). Once the discrimination was acquired, doses of CYC (0, 500, and 625 mg) and GBP (0, 100, 200, and 400 mg) each alone and in combination with the training dose of naloxone were tested. GBP alone produced only placebo-appropriate responding and did not significantly alter naloxone discrimination when coadministered with naloxone, though it modestly reduced naloxone-induced visual analog scale ratings of drug 'strength'. CYC alone also produced predominantly placebo-appropriate responding and did not modulate naloxone-appropriate responding, but increased ratings of bad effects and decreased ratings of like placebo relative to naloxone alone at the 500 mg dose. These null findings regarding the modulation of naloxone discrimination highlight the limited efficacy of GBP and CYC in this context, contributing to the understanding of pharmacological interactions with opioid antagonists and their potential implications for opioid withdrawal treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":8832,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"265-275"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226226/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0000000000000823","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The present study examined the impact of the N-type calcium channel blocker gabapentin (GBP) and the partial glycine agonist D-cycloserine (CYC) to attenuate the behavioral effects of naloxone in opioid-dependent humans responding under a naloxone discrimination procedure. Methadone-maintained participants were trained to distinguish between a low dose of naloxone (0.15 mg/70 kg, i.m.; i.e., drug A) and placebo (i.e. drug B) under an instructed novel-response drug discrimination procedure, in which participants identify the drug condition as 'A', 'B', or 'N' (neither A nor B - 'novel'). Once the discrimination was acquired, doses of CYC (0, 500, and 625 mg) and GBP (0, 100, 200, and 400 mg) each alone and in combination with the training dose of naloxone were tested. GBP alone produced only placebo-appropriate responding and did not significantly alter naloxone discrimination when coadministered with naloxone, though it modestly reduced naloxone-induced visual analog scale ratings of drug 'strength'. CYC alone also produced predominantly placebo-appropriate responding and did not modulate naloxone-appropriate responding, but increased ratings of bad effects and decreased ratings of like placebo relative to naloxone alone at the 500 mg dose. These null findings regarding the modulation of naloxone discrimination highlight the limited efficacy of GBP and CYC in this context, contributing to the understanding of pharmacological interactions with opioid antagonists and their potential implications for opioid withdrawal treatment.
期刊介绍:
Behavioural Pharmacology accepts original full and short research reports in diverse areas ranging from ethopharmacology to the pharmacology of schedule-controlled operant behaviour, provided that their primary focus is behavioural. Suitable topics include drug, chemical and hormonal effects on behaviour, the neurochemical mechanisms under-lying behaviour, and behavioural methods for the study of drug action. Both animal and human studies are welcome; however, studies reporting neurochemical data should have a predominantly behavioural focus, and human studies should not consist exclusively of clinical trials or case reports. Preference is given to studies that demonstrate and develop the potential of behavioural methods, and to papers reporting findings of direct relevance to clinical problems. Papers making a significant theoretical contribution are particularly welcome and, where possible and merited, space is made available for authors to explore fully the theoretical implications of their findings. Reviews of an area of the literature or at an appropriate stage in the development of an author’s own work are welcome. Commentaries in areas of current interest are also considered for publication, as are Reviews and Commentaries in areas outside behavioural pharmacology, but of importance and interest to behavioural pharmacologists. Behavioural Pharmacology publishes frequent Special Issues on current hot topics. The editors welcome correspondence about whether a paper in preparation might be suitable for inclusion in a Special Issue.