Efficacy and Safety of a Newly Developed Botulinum Toxin A (MBA-P01) in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Glabellar Lines: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Multi-Center, Phase III Study with a Subgroup Analysis on Patients with COVID-19.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Toxins Pub Date : 2025-03-23 DOI:10.3390/toxins17040160
Hye Sung Han, Won-Serk Kim, Yangwon Lee, Chong-Hyun Won, Wooshun Lee, Sun Young Choi, Beom Joon Kim
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of a Newly Developed Botulinum Toxin A (MBA-P01) in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Glabellar Lines: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Multi-Center, Phase III Study with a Subgroup Analysis on Patients with COVID-19.","authors":"Hye Sung Han, Won-Serk Kim, Yangwon Lee, Chong-Hyun Won, Wooshun Lee, Sun Young Choi, Beom Joon Kim","doi":"10.3390/toxins17040160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>MBA-P01 is a newly developed botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) product designed to provide similar clinical effects as OnabotulinumtoxinA (ONA-BoNT-A), thereby providing an alternative treatment option for glabellar lines. It is another holotoxin preparation containing BoNT-A1. This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multi-center, Phase III clinical trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MBA-P01 compared with OnabotulinumtoxinA (ONA-BoNT-A). In total, 318 participants were enrolled and received 20 units of MBA-P01 or ONA-BoNT-A on the forehead and glabella. At the 4-week assessment, the primary endpoint revealed no significant difference in the improvement rate of glabellar wrinkles between the two groups, confirming the non-inferiority of MBA-P01 to ONA-BoNT-A. Furthermore, some evaluation variables showed higher improvement rates for MBA-P01 than for ONA-BoNT-A. Adverse reactions and other safety analysis results were considered acceptable. Interestingly, a subgroup analysis of patients with the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) showed that the duration of BoNT-A treatment was shorter among those who contracted COVID-19 after BoNT-A treatment compared with those who have not. The limitations of this study include the predominance of female participants and the exclusive enrollment of Korean patients. MBA-P01 is expected to be clinically useful in terms of the efficient and safe reduction of glabellar wrinkles, which will provide patients with additional treatment options.</p>","PeriodicalId":23119,"journal":{"name":"Toxins","volume":"17 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12031167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxins","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17040160","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

MBA-P01 is a newly developed botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) product designed to provide similar clinical effects as OnabotulinumtoxinA (ONA-BoNT-A), thereby providing an alternative treatment option for glabellar lines. It is another holotoxin preparation containing BoNT-A1. This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multi-center, Phase III clinical trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MBA-P01 compared with OnabotulinumtoxinA (ONA-BoNT-A). In total, 318 participants were enrolled and received 20 units of MBA-P01 or ONA-BoNT-A on the forehead and glabella. At the 4-week assessment, the primary endpoint revealed no significant difference in the improvement rate of glabellar wrinkles between the two groups, confirming the non-inferiority of MBA-P01 to ONA-BoNT-A. Furthermore, some evaluation variables showed higher improvement rates for MBA-P01 than for ONA-BoNT-A. Adverse reactions and other safety analysis results were considered acceptable. Interestingly, a subgroup analysis of patients with the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) showed that the duration of BoNT-A treatment was shorter among those who contracted COVID-19 after BoNT-A treatment compared with those who have not. The limitations of this study include the predominance of female participants and the exclusive enrollment of Korean patients. MBA-P01 is expected to be clinically useful in terms of the efficient and safe reduction of glabellar wrinkles, which will provide patients with additional treatment options.

新开发的肉毒毒素a (MBA-P01)在中重度Glabellar Lines患者中的疗效和安全性:一项针对COVID-19患者的随机、双盲、主动对照、多中心、III期研究和亚组分析
MBA-P01是一种新开发的肉毒毒素a (BoNT-A)产品,旨在提供与OnabotulinumtoxinA (ONA-BoNT-A)相似的临床效果,从而为小梁线提供了另一种治疗选择。它是另一种含有BoNT-A1的全毒制剂。这项随机、双盲、主动对照、多中心的III期临床试验旨在评估MBA-P01与OnabotulinumtoxinA (ONA-BoNT-A)的疗效和安全性。总共有318名参与者被招募,并在前额和眉间接受了20个单位的MBA-P01或ONA-BoNT-A。在4周的评估中,主要终点显示两组间眉间皱纹的改善率无显著差异,证实了MBA-P01对ONA-BoNT-A的非劣效性。此外,一些评估变量显示MBA-P01的改善率高于ONA-BoNT-A。不良反应和其他安全性分析结果被认为是可接受的。有趣的是,对冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者的亚组分析显示,在接受BoNT-A治疗后感染COVID-19的患者与未感染的患者相比,BoNT-A治疗的持续时间更短。本研究的局限性包括女性参与者的优势和韩国患者的独家入组。MBA-P01有望在有效和安全的减少眉间皱纹方面发挥临床作用,这将为患者提供额外的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Toxins
Toxins TOXICOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
765
审稿时长
16.24 days
期刊介绍: Toxins (ISSN 2072-6651) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to toxins and toxinology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信