Occupational Physicians' Behavioral Determinants Regarding Prevention and the Association With Time Allocated to Preventive Tasks.

IF 1.4
Suzanne Orhan Pees, Sandra van Oostrom, Frederieke Schaafsma, Karin Proper
{"title":"Occupational Physicians' Behavioral Determinants Regarding Prevention and the Association With Time Allocated to Preventive Tasks.","authors":"Suzanne Orhan Pees, Sandra van Oostrom, Frederieke Schaafsma, Karin Proper","doi":"10.1097/JOM.0000000000003422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While prevention is key in preventing work-related health problems, it is unclear how much time Dutch occupational physicians (OPs) allocate to preventive tasks. This study aimed to assess OPs' attitudes, social influence, and self-efficacy (ASE) regarding preventive tasks and the association with time allocated to these tasks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, questionnaire data on ASE determinants and time allocated to preventive tasks were collected from 227 OPs and analyzed using multivariable linear regression, adjusted for demographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OPs spent about 10% of their time on preventive tasks, had a positive attitude but low self-efficacy, and experienced varying social support. Results showed that social support from employers and OPs' self-efficacy were positively associated with time allocated to prevention. For attitude towards prevention and time allocated to preventive tasks, no association was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Efforts should be made to increase social support and improve self-efficacy for Dutch OPs, for example by developing educational programs for both OPs and employers.</p>","PeriodicalId":94100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","volume":" ","pages":"685-690"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379773/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000003422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: While prevention is key in preventing work-related health problems, it is unclear how much time Dutch occupational physicians (OPs) allocate to preventive tasks. This study aimed to assess OPs' attitudes, social influence, and self-efficacy (ASE) regarding preventive tasks and the association with time allocated to these tasks.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, questionnaire data on ASE determinants and time allocated to preventive tasks were collected from 227 OPs and analyzed using multivariable linear regression, adjusted for demographic characteristics.

Results: OPs spent about 10% of their time on preventive tasks, had a positive attitude but low self-efficacy, and experienced varying social support. Results showed that social support from employers and OPs' self-efficacy were positively associated with time allocated to prevention. For attitude towards prevention and time allocated to preventive tasks, no association was found.

Conclusions: Efforts should be made to increase social support and improve self-efficacy for Dutch OPs, for example by developing educational programs for both OPs and employers.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

职业医生在预防方面的行为决定因素及其与分配到预防任务的时间的关系。
摘要:目的:虽然预防是预防工作相关健康问题的关键,但目前尚不清楚荷兰职业医生(OPs)在预防工作上投入了多少时间。本研究旨在评估OPs对预防性任务的态度、社会影响力和自我效能感(ASE),以及与这些任务分配时间的关系。方法:在这项横断面研究中,从227个OPs收集了关于ASE决定因素和分配到预防任务的时间的问卷数据,并使用多变量线性回归进行分析,并根据人口统计学和组织特征进行了调整。结果:OPs在预防任务上花费的时间约为10%,态度积极但自我效能感较低,社会支持程度不一。在ASE决定因素和用于预防任务的时间之间没有发现关联。结论:未来的研究应关注影响预防的因素以及不同利益相关者在这方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信