Influence of apical diameter and instrument taper on apical debris extrusion during root canal instrumentation: An in vitro study.

Amit Kumar, Mamta Kaushik, Neha Mehra, Neha Verma, Tripti Rathore
{"title":"Influence of apical diameter and instrument taper on apical debris extrusion during root canal instrumentation: An <i>in vitro</i> study.","authors":"Amit Kumar, Mamta Kaushik, Neha Mehra, Neha Verma, Tripti Rathore","doi":"10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_14_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Apical debris extrusion can result in complications leading to unfavorable clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This <i>in vitro</i> study aimed to ascertain the influence of apical size and variation of instrument taper on the apical extrusion of debris.</p><p><strong>Setting and design: </strong>Forty roots from sixty recently extracted human permanent mandibular molars were selected. The apical diameter was measured using an image analysis program and divided into two groups: mesial roots for narrower canals (N) (<i>n</i> = 20) and distal roots for wider canals (W) (<i>n</i> = 20). These were further subdivided based on preparation size and instrument taper as #25/0.04 and #25/0.06 for narrower and #30/0.04 and #30/0.06 for wider canals.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The canals were prepared using Hero Shapers, with double distilled water as irrigant. The extruded debris was collected using the Myers and Montgomery method.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>The mean weight of extruded debris was analyzed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The Mann-Whitney test compared the differences in the weight of debris between different tapers and different canal widths. The level of significance was set at <i>P</i> ≤ 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Narrow canals prepared using #25/0.06 showed significantly more debris extrusion when compared to #25/0.04 (<i>P</i> = 0.017). Wider canals, when instrumented with a #30/0.04, had more extrusion of debris than #30/0.06. However, the difference between 0.04 and 0.06 taper was not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The apical diameter and instrument taper are essential factors to be considered to minimize debris extrusion. Narrower diameter, when instrumented with greater taper, exhibited more apical debris extrusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":516842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","volume":"28 3","pages":"279-284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12007744/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_14_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Apical debris extrusion can result in complications leading to unfavorable clinical outcomes.

Aim: This in vitro study aimed to ascertain the influence of apical size and variation of instrument taper on the apical extrusion of debris.

Setting and design: Forty roots from sixty recently extracted human permanent mandibular molars were selected. The apical diameter was measured using an image analysis program and divided into two groups: mesial roots for narrower canals (N) (n = 20) and distal roots for wider canals (W) (n = 20). These were further subdivided based on preparation size and instrument taper as #25/0.04 and #25/0.06 for narrower and #30/0.04 and #30/0.06 for wider canals.

Materials and methods: The canals were prepared using Hero Shapers, with double distilled water as irrigant. The extruded debris was collected using the Myers and Montgomery method.

Statistical analysis used: The mean weight of extruded debris was analyzed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The Mann-Whitney test compared the differences in the weight of debris between different tapers and different canal widths. The level of significance was set at P ≤ 0.05.

Results: Narrow canals prepared using #25/0.06 showed significantly more debris extrusion when compared to #25/0.04 (P = 0.017). Wider canals, when instrumented with a #30/0.04, had more extrusion of debris than #30/0.06. However, the difference between 0.04 and 0.06 taper was not significant.

Conclusion: The apical diameter and instrument taper are essential factors to be considered to minimize debris extrusion. Narrower diameter, when instrumented with greater taper, exhibited more apical debris extrusion.

根管预备时根尖直径和器械锥度对根尖碎片挤压的影响:一项体外研究。
背景:根尖碎片挤压可导致并发症,导致不良的临床结果。目的:通过体外实验研究器械尖的大小和器械锥度的变化对碎片尖挤压的影响。设置与设计:从60颗近期拔除的人类恒颌磨牙中选择40颗牙根。使用图像分析程序测量根尖直径,并将根尖直径分为两组:狭窄根管的近中根(N = 20)和较宽根管的远中根(W = 20)。根据制剂尺寸和器械锥度进一步细分,窄管为#25/0.04和#25/0.06,宽管为#30/0.04和#30/0.06。材料与方法:采用Hero Shapers,用双蒸馏水灌溉。挤压的碎片是用Myers和Montgomery的方法收集的。采用统计分析:采用Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验分析挤压碎片的平均重量。曼-惠特尼试验比较了不同锥度和不同运河宽度之间碎片重量的差异。P≤0.05为显著性水平。结果:与#25/0.04制备的窄管相比,#25/0.06制备的窄管明显有更多的碎片挤压(P = 0.017)。当使用#30/0.04时,更宽的管道比#30/0.06有更多的碎片挤压。0.04和0.06锥度的差异不显著。结论:根尖直径和器械锥度是减少碎片挤压的重要因素。直径越窄,置入锥度越大,显示出更多的根尖碎片挤压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信