Evaluation of the Occlusion Break Surge Volume in Five Different Phacoemulsification Systems.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2025-04-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S516801
Satish Yalamanchili, Ali Aboughaida, Omid S Rohani, David William Dyk
{"title":"Evaluation of the Occlusion Break Surge Volume in Five Different Phacoemulsification Systems.","authors":"Satish Yalamanchili, Ali Aboughaida, Omid S Rohani, David William Dyk","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S516801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare surge volume after occlusion breaks in five phacoemulsification systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mechanical spring-eye model was used to evaluate the Legion™ Vision System with the Single Use Fluidics Management System (FMS) (LEG), Infiniti™ Vision System with Intrepid™ Plus FMS (INF), Whitestar Signature Pro<sup>®</sup> with the OPO73 pack (WSP), Compact Intuitiv<sup>®</sup> with the OPO80 pack (CIS), and Stellaris PC<sup>®</sup> with the StableChamber cassette (SPC). Transient occlusion break surge volume responses were assessed across a full range of system settings (IOP: 30 to 80 mmHg; vacuum limit: 300 to 650 mmHg; aspiration rate: 20 or 40 cc/min. Oscilloscope waveforms covered stable flow before occlusion, full occlusion, occlusion break, and full recovery to stable flow. Raw oscilloscope data were converted to volumetric and pressure measurements. Fitted average surge traces were generated for each test condition and used to develop an interpolation algorithm to predict transient occlusion break surge events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The minimum surge volume for all systems occurred at the highest IOP (80 mmHg) and the lowest tested vacuum limit (300 mmHg). Overall, the surge volume increased with increasing vacuum limit and decreasing IOP on the LEG, INF CIS, WSP, and SPC systems. The occlusion break surge volumes (µL [standard deviation]) at 60 mmHg IOP and vacuum limit of 500 mmHg were 70.4 [8.1] for LEG; 87.4 [9.7] for INF; 85.8 [7.2] for CIS; 69.5 [5.0] for WSP; and 151.7 [20.2]) for SPC. A Games-Howell post-hoc test showed significant differences between three groups: A) LEG/WSP, B) CIS/INF, and C) SPC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Legion system demonstrated comparable or lower predicted surge volume after occlusion breaks compared to the other phacoemulsification systems evaluated. Reductions in occlusion break surge volumes are expected to decrease the rate of complications and lead to improved outcomes in the clinical cataract surgery setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"1357-1364"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12034251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S516801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare surge volume after occlusion breaks in five phacoemulsification systems.

Methods: A mechanical spring-eye model was used to evaluate the Legion™ Vision System with the Single Use Fluidics Management System (FMS) (LEG), Infiniti™ Vision System with Intrepid™ Plus FMS (INF), Whitestar Signature Pro® with the OPO73 pack (WSP), Compact Intuitiv® with the OPO80 pack (CIS), and Stellaris PC® with the StableChamber cassette (SPC). Transient occlusion break surge volume responses were assessed across a full range of system settings (IOP: 30 to 80 mmHg; vacuum limit: 300 to 650 mmHg; aspiration rate: 20 or 40 cc/min. Oscilloscope waveforms covered stable flow before occlusion, full occlusion, occlusion break, and full recovery to stable flow. Raw oscilloscope data were converted to volumetric and pressure measurements. Fitted average surge traces were generated for each test condition and used to develop an interpolation algorithm to predict transient occlusion break surge events.

Results: The minimum surge volume for all systems occurred at the highest IOP (80 mmHg) and the lowest tested vacuum limit (300 mmHg). Overall, the surge volume increased with increasing vacuum limit and decreasing IOP on the LEG, INF CIS, WSP, and SPC systems. The occlusion break surge volumes (µL [standard deviation]) at 60 mmHg IOP and vacuum limit of 500 mmHg were 70.4 [8.1] for LEG; 87.4 [9.7] for INF; 85.8 [7.2] for CIS; 69.5 [5.0] for WSP; and 151.7 [20.2]) for SPC. A Games-Howell post-hoc test showed significant differences between three groups: A) LEG/WSP, B) CIS/INF, and C) SPC.

Conclusion: The Legion system demonstrated comparable or lower predicted surge volume after occlusion breaks compared to the other phacoemulsification systems evaluated. Reductions in occlusion break surge volumes are expected to decrease the rate of complications and lead to improved outcomes in the clinical cataract surgery setting.

五种不同超声乳化术系统闭塞破裂波积的评价。
目的:比较5种超声乳化术系统闭塞破裂后的涌气量。方法:采用机械弹簧眼模型对使用一次性流体管理系统(FMS) (LEG)的Legion™视觉系统、使用Intrepid™Plus FMS (INF)的Infiniti™视觉系统、使用OPO73包(WSP)的Whitestar Signature Pro®、使用OPO80包(CIS)的Compact Intuitiv®和使用stablecchamber卡带(SPC)的Stellaris PC®进行评估。在全系统设置(IOP: 30 - 80 mmHg;真空极限:300 ~ 650 mmHg;吸入率:20或40cc /min。示波器波形覆盖了稳定流量前的闭塞,完全闭塞,闭塞打破,和完全恢复到稳定流量。原始示波器数据被转换成体积和压力测量。为每个测试条件生成拟合的平均浪涌轨迹,并用于开发插值算法来预测瞬态闭塞破裂浪涌事件。结果:在最高眼压(80 mmHg)和最低测试真空极限(300 mmHg)时,所有系统的最小浪涌体积均出现。总体而言,在LEG、INF、WSP和SPC系统中,浪涌体积随着真空极限的增加和IOP的降低而增加。在60 mmHg IOP和500 mmHg真空极限下,LEG的阻断浪涌体积(µL[标准差])为70.4 [8.1];INF为87.4 [9.7];CIS为85.8 [7.2];WSP为69.5 [5.0];和151.7[20.2])。game - howell事后检验显示,A) LEG/WSP组、B) CIS/INF组和C) SPC组之间存在显著差异。结论:与评估的其他超声乳化系统相比,Legion系统在闭塞破裂后显示出相当或更低的预测激增量。减少阻断浪涌量有望降低并发症的发生率,并改善临床白内障手术的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信