Exploring Staff Beliefs About Unplanned Discharge and Related Harms in VA Substance Use Disorder Residential Programs: A Qualitative Study.

Natalie B Riblet, Susan Stevens, Lauren Kenneally, Lisa Zubkoff, Daniel J Gottlieb, Brian Shiner, Melissa Ley-Thomson, Brett Rusch
{"title":"Exploring Staff Beliefs About Unplanned Discharge and Related Harms in VA Substance Use Disorder Residential Programs: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Natalie B Riblet, Susan Stevens, Lauren Kenneally, Lisa Zubkoff, Daniel J Gottlieb, Brian Shiner, Melissa Ley-Thomson, Brett Rusch","doi":"10.1177/29767342251335731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unplanned discharge is common in substance use disorder (SUD) residential programs and associated with worse outcomes such as relapse and suicide. There is high variation in unplanned discharge rates across Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) SUD residential programs. Little is known about program factors related to unplanned discharge in these settings. We aimed to discover staff beliefs about avoiding unplanned discharge and related harms in VA SUD residential programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified VA sites with low (<10%) and high rates (≥30%) of unplanned discharge. Informed by the Theory of Planned Behavior, we conducted semi-structured interviews with staff members at sites to learn about staff beliefs about unplanned discharge and its related harms in SUD residential settings. Two analysts reviewed the data and employed a combination of directed-content analysis and inductive methods to identify themes stratified by high- versus low-rate sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 10 sites (20 participants). There was high variability in how participants and sites operationalized unplanned discharge. Participants at low-rate sites generally emphasized harm-reduction approaches as useful ways to treat problematic behaviors that could result in an unplanned discharge. Participants at high-rate sites, on the other hand, favored the use of boards or councils to manage these concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SUD residential programs should standardize the way that they define and document unplanned discharge. Future research should study the role of harm-reduction strategies and councils in mitigating unplanned discharge and related harms.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":" ","pages":"29767342251335731"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342251335731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Unplanned discharge is common in substance use disorder (SUD) residential programs and associated with worse outcomes such as relapse and suicide. There is high variation in unplanned discharge rates across Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) SUD residential programs. Little is known about program factors related to unplanned discharge in these settings. We aimed to discover staff beliefs about avoiding unplanned discharge and related harms in VA SUD residential programs.

Methods: We identified VA sites with low (<10%) and high rates (≥30%) of unplanned discharge. Informed by the Theory of Planned Behavior, we conducted semi-structured interviews with staff members at sites to learn about staff beliefs about unplanned discharge and its related harms in SUD residential settings. Two analysts reviewed the data and employed a combination of directed-content analysis and inductive methods to identify themes stratified by high- versus low-rate sites.

Results: We enrolled 10 sites (20 participants). There was high variability in how participants and sites operationalized unplanned discharge. Participants at low-rate sites generally emphasized harm-reduction approaches as useful ways to treat problematic behaviors that could result in an unplanned discharge. Participants at high-rate sites, on the other hand, favored the use of boards or councils to manage these concerns.

Conclusions: SUD residential programs should standardize the way that they define and document unplanned discharge. Future research should study the role of harm-reduction strategies and councils in mitigating unplanned discharge and related harms.

探索退伍军人事务部物质使用障碍住院项目中工作人员对意外出院及相关危害的信念:一项定性研究。
背景:意外出院在物质使用障碍(SUD)住院治疗项目中很常见,并与复发和自杀等较差的结果相关。在退伍军人事务部(VA) SUD住宅项目中,计划外出院率差异很大。在这些环境中,与计划外出院相关的程序因素知之甚少。我们的目的是发现员工对VA SUD住院项目中避免意外出院和相关伤害的信念。方法:我们确定了低VA的位点(结果:我们招募了10个位点(20名受试者)。参与者和场所如何实施计划外排放存在很大的可变性。低率站点的参与者通常强调减少伤害的方法是治疗可能导致意外出院的问题行为的有效方法。另一方面,高费率网站的参与者倾向于使用董事会或理事会来管理这些问题。结论:SUD住院项目应规范非计划出院的定义和记录方式。未来的研究应该研究减少危害战略和理事会在减轻计划外排放和相关危害方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信