Personal Explanations for Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.

Schizophrenia bulletin open Pub Date : 2025-03-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/schizbullopen/sgaf006
Benjamin-Rose Ingall, Merly McPhilbin, Felix Lewandowski, Yasuhiro Kotera, Gerald Jordan, Mike Slade, Fiona Ng
{"title":"Personal Explanations for Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.","authors":"Benjamin-Rose Ingall, Merly McPhilbin, Felix Lewandowski, Yasuhiro Kotera, Gerald Jordan, Mike Slade, Fiona Ng","doi":"10.1093/schizbullopen/sgaf006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and hypothesis: </strong>Psychosis refers to the state whereby one's experience of reality differs from those around them. The ineffability of psychosis does not render the experience void of meaning, and the ways individuals integrate their experiences of psychosis into their life narratives cannot be dismissed. Meaning is an essential part of recovery. This review aimed to identify categories of personal explanations that people with psychosis use to explain their experiences.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This systematic review is based on a preregistered protocol (CRD42023421125). Four databases, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and PsycINFO, and 5 journals were searched April to November 2023. Qualitative and mixed-methods studies that explored the personal explanations employed by adults who experience psychosis, regardless of diagnostic status, were included.</p><p><strong>Study results: </strong>Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria, representing the views of 682 participants from 15 countries. Included studies were appraised using the CASP Qualitative Studies Checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>were synthesized using thematic analysis. Personal explanations for psychosis experiences were grouped into 5 themes: Physical and psychiatric; Traumatic and adversarial; Emotional; Religious, spiritual, and magical; No explanation. Participants reported multiple explanations for their experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals with experience of psychosis seek to explain these experiences, and these personal explanations may be multiple and complex in nature. The identified personal explanations can be used to further explore the ways that people situate their experiences into their personal context. This understanding should be utilized by professionals to support the provision of recovery-oriented care, with implications for assessment, treatment, intervention, and recovery outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94380,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia bulletin open","volume":"6 1","pages":"sgaf006"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12062962/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia bulletin open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/schizbullopen/sgaf006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and hypothesis: Psychosis refers to the state whereby one's experience of reality differs from those around them. The ineffability of psychosis does not render the experience void of meaning, and the ways individuals integrate their experiences of psychosis into their life narratives cannot be dismissed. Meaning is an essential part of recovery. This review aimed to identify categories of personal explanations that people with psychosis use to explain their experiences.

Study design: This systematic review is based on a preregistered protocol (CRD42023421125). Four databases, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and PsycINFO, and 5 journals were searched April to November 2023. Qualitative and mixed-methods studies that explored the personal explanations employed by adults who experience psychosis, regardless of diagnostic status, were included.

Study results: Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria, representing the views of 682 participants from 15 countries. Included studies were appraised using the CASP Qualitative Studies Checklist.

Results: were synthesized using thematic analysis. Personal explanations for psychosis experiences were grouped into 5 themes: Physical and psychiatric; Traumatic and adversarial; Emotional; Religious, spiritual, and magical; No explanation. Participants reported multiple explanations for their experiences.

Conclusions: Individuals with experience of psychosis seek to explain these experiences, and these personal explanations may be multiple and complex in nature. The identified personal explanations can be used to further explore the ways that people situate their experiences into their personal context. This understanding should be utilized by professionals to support the provision of recovery-oriented care, with implications for assessment, treatment, intervention, and recovery outcomes.

精神病的个人解释:系统回顾和专题综合。
背景与假设:精神病是指一个人对现实的体验与周围人不同的状态。精神病的不可言说性并没有使其经历失去意义,个体将其精神病经历融入其生活叙事的方式也不能被忽视。意义是恢复的重要组成部分。本综述旨在确定精神病患者用来解释其经历的个人解释类别。研究设计:本系统评价基于预注册方案(CRD42023421125)。检索了MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus和PsycINFO 4个数据库和5种期刊。定性和混合方法的研究探讨了经历精神病的成年人所采用的个人解释,而不管诊断状态如何。研究结果:25项研究符合纳入标准,代表了来自15个国家的682名参与者的观点。使用CASP定性研究检查表对纳入的研究进行评价。结果:采用主题分析法进行综合分析。个人对精神病经历的解释分为5个主题:生理和精神;创伤性和对抗性;情感;宗教的、精神的和魔法的;没有解释。参与者对他们的经历有多种解释。结论:有精神病经历的个体寻求解释这些经历,这些个人解释可能是多重和复杂的。确定的个人解释可以用来进一步探索人们将他们的经历置于个人背景中的方式。专业人员应该利用这一认识来支持提供以康复为导向的护理,包括评估、治疗、干预和康复结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信