Multi-environment trials data analysis: linear mixed model-based approaches using spatial and factor analytic models.

Frontiers in research metrics and analytics Pub Date : 2025-04-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frma.2025.1472282
Tarekegn Argaw, Berhanu Amsalu Fenta, Habtemariam Zegeye, Girum Azmach, Assefa Funga
{"title":"Multi-environment trials data analysis: linear mixed model-based approaches using spatial and factor analytic models.","authors":"Tarekegn Argaw, Berhanu Amsalu Fenta, Habtemariam Zegeye, Girum Azmach, Assefa Funga","doi":"10.3389/frma.2025.1472282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The analysis of multi-environment trials (MET) data in plant breeding and agricultural research is inherently challenging, with conventional ANOVA-based methods exhibiting limitations as the complexity of MET experiments grows. This study presents linear mixed model-based approaches for MET data analysis. Ten MET grain yield datasets from national variety trials in Ethiopia were used. Randomized complete block (RCB) design analysis, spatial analysis, and spatial+genotype-by-environment (G × E) analysis were compared under linear mixed model framework. Spatial analysis detected significant local, global, and extraneous spatial variations, with positive spatial correlations. For the spatial + G × E analysis, increasing the order of the factor analytic (FA) models improved the explanation of G × E variance, though the optimal FA model order was dataset-dependent. Integrating spatial variability through the spatial + G × E modeling approach substantially improved genetic parameter estimates and minimized residual variability. This improvement was particularly notable in larger datasets, where the number of trials and the size of each trial played a crucial role for presence of spatial variability and strong GxE effects. Additionally, the genetic correlation heat maps and dendrograms provided intuitive insights into trial relationships, revealing patterns of strong positive, negative, and weak correlations, as well as distinct trial clusters. The results clearly demonstrate that linear mixed model-based approaches, especially the spatial + G × E analysis excel in capturing complex spatial plot variation and G × E effects in MET data by effectively integrating spatial and FA models. These insights have important implications for improving the efficiency and accuracy of MET data analysis, which is crucial for improving genetic gain estimation in plant breeding and agricultural research, ultimately accelerating the delivery of high-performing crop varieties to farmers and consumers.</p>","PeriodicalId":73104,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","volume":"10 ","pages":"1472282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12034942/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2025.1472282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The analysis of multi-environment trials (MET) data in plant breeding and agricultural research is inherently challenging, with conventional ANOVA-based methods exhibiting limitations as the complexity of MET experiments grows. This study presents linear mixed model-based approaches for MET data analysis. Ten MET grain yield datasets from national variety trials in Ethiopia were used. Randomized complete block (RCB) design analysis, spatial analysis, and spatial+genotype-by-environment (G × E) analysis were compared under linear mixed model framework. Spatial analysis detected significant local, global, and extraneous spatial variations, with positive spatial correlations. For the spatial + G × E analysis, increasing the order of the factor analytic (FA) models improved the explanation of G × E variance, though the optimal FA model order was dataset-dependent. Integrating spatial variability through the spatial + G × E modeling approach substantially improved genetic parameter estimates and minimized residual variability. This improvement was particularly notable in larger datasets, where the number of trials and the size of each trial played a crucial role for presence of spatial variability and strong GxE effects. Additionally, the genetic correlation heat maps and dendrograms provided intuitive insights into trial relationships, revealing patterns of strong positive, negative, and weak correlations, as well as distinct trial clusters. The results clearly demonstrate that linear mixed model-based approaches, especially the spatial + G × E analysis excel in capturing complex spatial plot variation and G × E effects in MET data by effectively integrating spatial and FA models. These insights have important implications for improving the efficiency and accuracy of MET data analysis, which is crucial for improving genetic gain estimation in plant breeding and agricultural research, ultimately accelerating the delivery of high-performing crop varieties to farmers and consumers.

多环境试验数据分析:使用空间和因子分析模型的基于线性混合模型的方法。
植物育种和农业研究中的多环境试验(MET)数据分析本身就具有挑战性,随着MET实验复杂性的增加,传统的基于方差分析的方法显示出局限性。本研究提出了基于线性混合模型的MET数据分析方法。使用了来自埃塞俄比亚国家品种试验的10个MET谷物产量数据集。在线性混合模型框架下,比较随机完全块(RCB)设计分析、空间分析和空间+环境基因型(G × E)分析。空间分析发现了显著的局部、全局和外部空间变化,具有正的空间相关性。对于空间+ G × E分析,增加因子分析(FA)模型的阶数可以改善对G × E方差的解释,但最优FA模型的阶数取决于数据集。通过空间+ G × E建模方法整合空间变异性,大大改善了遗传参数估计,并最小化了剩余变异性。这种改进在较大的数据集中尤为显著,其中试验的数量和每个试验的大小对空间变异性和强GxE效应的存在起着至关重要的作用。此外,遗传相关热图和树状图提供了对试验关系的直观见解,揭示了强正相关、负相关和弱相关的模式,以及不同的试验集群。结果表明,基于线性混合模型的方法,特别是空间+ G × E分析,通过有效地整合空间模型和FA模型,在捕获MET数据中复杂的空间样地变化和G × E效应方面表现出色。这些见解对提高MET数据分析的效率和准确性具有重要意义,这对于提高植物育种和农业研究中的遗传增益估计至关重要,最终加速向农民和消费者提供高性能作物品种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信