Influence of an ultrasound-guided catheter-over-needle technique on the incidence of intravascular injection during caudal epidural injections: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Byeongcheol Lee, Daeseok Oh
{"title":"Influence of an ultrasound-guided catheter-over-needle technique on the incidence of intravascular injection during caudal epidural injections: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Byeongcheol Lee, Daeseok Oh","doi":"10.11152/mu-4507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Caudal epidural injection is used for lumbosacral radicular pain but there is a risk of vascular injection. An ultrasound-guided catheter-over-needle technique was proposed to reduce this risk. This study compared the incidence of vascular injections between the catheter-over-needle and Tuohy needle methods for caudal epidural injections.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong> This prospective, randomized clinical trial included patients aged ≥19 years with degenerative lumbar disease accompanied by radicular pain who were unresponsive to non-invasive treatments and scheduled for caudal epidural injection. The participants were randomized into two groups: catheter-over-needle and Tuohy needle groups. Under ultrasound guidance, the contrast medium was injected and observed in real time using fluoroscopy. An independent physician assessed the vascular injection rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of vascular injection was significantly lower in the catheter-over-needle group (15.7%) than in the Tuohy needle group (37.5%; p=0.014). Chronic pain lasting >12 months was a significant risk factor for vascular injection (p=0.035). However, no statistically significant association was found between sacral opening depth and vascular injection, although the sacral opening depth was shorter in patients who received intravascular injections.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The catheter-over-needle technique significantly reduces the risk of vascular injection. The depth of the sacral opening may also influence vascular injection.</p>","PeriodicalId":94138,"journal":{"name":"Medical ultrasonography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical ultrasonography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11152/mu-4507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Caudal epidural injection is used for lumbosacral radicular pain but there is a risk of vascular injection. An ultrasound-guided catheter-over-needle technique was proposed to reduce this risk. This study compared the incidence of vascular injections between the catheter-over-needle and Tuohy needle methods for caudal epidural injections.

Material and methods:  This prospective, randomized clinical trial included patients aged ≥19 years with degenerative lumbar disease accompanied by radicular pain who were unresponsive to non-invasive treatments and scheduled for caudal epidural injection. The participants were randomized into two groups: catheter-over-needle and Tuohy needle groups. Under ultrasound guidance, the contrast medium was injected and observed in real time using fluoroscopy. An independent physician assessed the vascular injection rates.

Results: The incidence of vascular injection was significantly lower in the catheter-over-needle group (15.7%) than in the Tuohy needle group (37.5%; p=0.014). Chronic pain lasting >12 months was a significant risk factor for vascular injection (p=0.035). However, no statistically significant association was found between sacral opening depth and vascular injection, although the sacral opening depth was shorter in patients who received intravascular injections.

Conclusions: The catheter-over-needle technique significantly reduces the risk of vascular injection. The depth of the sacral opening may also influence vascular injection.

超声引导下导管过针技术对尾侧硬膜外注射时血管内注射发生率的影响:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
目的:尾侧硬膜外注射用于治疗腰骶神经根性疼痛,但存在血管注射的风险。超声引导下的导管过针技术可以降低这种风险。本研究比较了导管-针上法和Tuohy针法在尾侧硬膜外注射中的血管注射发生率。材料和方法:这项前瞻性随机临床试验纳入年龄≥19岁的退行性腰椎疾病伴神经根性疼痛患者,这些患者对非侵入性治疗无反应,计划行尾侧硬膜外注射。参与者被随机分为两组:导管-针组和双针组。超声引导下注入造影剂,透视实时观察。一位独立医生评估了血管注射率。结果:导管过针组血管注射发生率(15.7%)明显低于Tuohy针组(37.5%);p = 0.014)。慢性疼痛持续12个月是血管注射的重要危险因素(p=0.035)。然而,尽管接受血管内注射的患者的骶开口深度较短,但骶开口深度与血管注射之间没有统计学上的显著关联。结论:导管过针技术可显著降低血管注射风险。骶骨开口的深度也可能影响血管注射。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信