Artificial Sweeteners: A Double-Edged Sword for Gut Microbiome.

IF 2.9 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Helal F Hetta, Nizar Sirag, Hassabelrasoul Elfadil, Ayman Salama, Sara F Aljadrawi, Amani J Alfaifi, Asma N Alwabisi, Bothinah M AbuAlhasan, Layan S Alanazi, Yara A Aljohani, Yasmin N Ramadan, Noura H Abd Ellah, Abdelazeem M Algammal
{"title":"Artificial Sweeteners: A Double-Edged Sword for Gut Microbiome.","authors":"Helal F Hetta, Nizar Sirag, Hassabelrasoul Elfadil, Ayman Salama, Sara F Aljadrawi, Amani J Alfaifi, Asma N Alwabisi, Bothinah M AbuAlhasan, Layan S Alanazi, Yara A Aljohani, Yasmin N Ramadan, Noura H Abd Ellah, Abdelazeem M Algammal","doi":"10.3390/diseases13040115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Aim</b>: The human gut microbiome plays a crucial role in maintaining health. Artificial sweeteners, also known as non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS), have garnered attention for their potential to disrupt the balance of the gut microbiome. This review explores the complex relationship between NNS and the gut microbiome, highlighting their potential benefits and risks. By synthesizing current evidence, we aim to provide a balanced perspective on the role of AS in dietary practices and health outcomes, emphasizing the need for targeted research to guide their safe and effective use. <b>Methods</b>: A comprehensive literature review was conducted through searches in PubMed and Google Scholar, focusing on the effects of artificial sweeteners on gut microbiota. The search utilized key terms including \"Gut Microbiome\", \"gut microbiota\", \"Eubiosis\", \"Dysbiosis\", \"Artificial Sweeteners\", and \"Nonnutritive Sweeteners\". <b>Results</b>: NNS may alter the gut microbiome, but findings remain inconsistent. Animal studies often report a decrease in beneficial bacteria like <i>Bifidobacterium</i> and <i>Lactobacillus</i>, and an increase in harmful strains such as <i>Clostridium difficile</i> and <i>E. coli</i>, potentially leading to inflammation and gut imbalance. Disruptions in short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production and gut hormone signaling have also been observed. However, human studies generally show milder or no significant changes, highlighting the limitations in translating animal model findings directly to humans. Differences in study design, dosage, exposure time, and sweetener type likely contribute to these varied outcomes. <b>Conclusions</b>: While NNS offer certain benefits, including reduced caloric intake and improved blood sugar regulation, their impact on gut microbiome health raises important concerns. The observed reduction in beneficial bacteria and the rise in pathogenic strains underscore the need for caution in NNS consumption. Furthermore, the disruption of SCFA production and metabolic pathways illustrates the intricate relationship between diet and gut health.</p>","PeriodicalId":72832,"journal":{"name":"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12025785/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases13040115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim: The human gut microbiome plays a crucial role in maintaining health. Artificial sweeteners, also known as non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS), have garnered attention for their potential to disrupt the balance of the gut microbiome. This review explores the complex relationship between NNS and the gut microbiome, highlighting their potential benefits and risks. By synthesizing current evidence, we aim to provide a balanced perspective on the role of AS in dietary practices and health outcomes, emphasizing the need for targeted research to guide their safe and effective use. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted through searches in PubMed and Google Scholar, focusing on the effects of artificial sweeteners on gut microbiota. The search utilized key terms including "Gut Microbiome", "gut microbiota", "Eubiosis", "Dysbiosis", "Artificial Sweeteners", and "Nonnutritive Sweeteners". Results: NNS may alter the gut microbiome, but findings remain inconsistent. Animal studies often report a decrease in beneficial bacteria like Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, and an increase in harmful strains such as Clostridium difficile and E. coli, potentially leading to inflammation and gut imbalance. Disruptions in short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production and gut hormone signaling have also been observed. However, human studies generally show milder or no significant changes, highlighting the limitations in translating animal model findings directly to humans. Differences in study design, dosage, exposure time, and sweetener type likely contribute to these varied outcomes. Conclusions: While NNS offer certain benefits, including reduced caloric intake and improved blood sugar regulation, their impact on gut microbiome health raises important concerns. The observed reduction in beneficial bacteria and the rise in pathogenic strains underscore the need for caution in NNS consumption. Furthermore, the disruption of SCFA production and metabolic pathways illustrates the intricate relationship between diet and gut health.

人造甜味剂:肠道微生物群的双刃剑。
背景与目的:人体肠道微生物群在维持健康中起着至关重要的作用。人造甜味剂,也被称为非营养性甜味剂(NNS),因其可能破坏肠道微生物群的平衡而引起了人们的关注。这篇综述探讨了NNS与肠道微生物群之间的复杂关系,强调了它们的潜在益处和风险。通过综合目前的证据,我们旨在为AS在饮食习惯和健康结果中的作用提供一个平衡的视角,强调需要有针对性的研究来指导其安全有效的使用。方法:通过检索PubMed和谷歌Scholar进行全面的文献综述,重点关注人工甜味剂对肠道微生物群的影响。搜索使用的关键词包括“肠道微生物组”、“肠道微生物群”、“益生菌”、“生态失调”、“人工甜味剂”和“非营养性甜味剂”。结果:NNS可能改变肠道微生物组,但研究结果仍不一致。动物研究经常报告双歧杆菌和乳酸杆菌等有益菌减少,艰难梭菌和大肠杆菌等有害菌增加,这可能导致炎症和肠道失衡。短链脂肪酸(SCFA)的产生和肠道激素信号的中断也被观察到。然而,人类研究通常显示出较温和或没有显著变化,这突出了将动物模型研究结果直接转化为人类的局限性。研究设计、剂量、暴露时间和甜味剂类型的差异可能导致这些不同的结果。结论:虽然NNS具有一定的益处,包括减少热量摄入和改善血糖调节,但它们对肠道微生物群健康的影响引起了重要关注。观察到的有益细菌减少和致病菌株增加强调了在NNS消费中需要谨慎。此外,短链脂肪酸生产和代谢途径的中断说明了饮食和肠道健康之间的复杂关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信