Impact of an evidence-based order panel on antibiotic prescribing in ambulatory patients with cystitis.

Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE Pub Date : 2025-04-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/ash.2025.62
Matt Neumann, Ryan W Stevens, Kristin Cole, Paschalis Vergidis, Abinash Virk, Dan Ilges, Kelsey L Jensen
{"title":"Impact of an evidence-based order panel on antibiotic prescribing in ambulatory patients with cystitis.","authors":"Matt Neumann, Ryan W Stevens, Kristin Cole, Paschalis Vergidis, Abinash Virk, Dan Ilges, Kelsey L Jensen","doi":"10.1017/ash.2025.62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimizing antibiotic prescribing for urinary tract infections (UTI) represents an opportunity for ambulatory antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs). A pre-populated order panel for UTI was implemented in the Mayo Clinic Enterprise in May 2022. The order panel provides antibiotic regimens aligning with institutional guidelines according to patient characteristics, presence or absence of complicating features, and antimicrobial allergy status. We assessed impacts of panel use on prescribing practices for cystitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study of ambulatory encounters with a primary diagnosis of cystitis from May 16, 2022, to May 15, 2023, compared encounters in which the order panel was utilized to encounters managed without the panel. The primary outcome was concordance with institutional guidelines, including drug selection, dose/frequency, and duration. Secondary outcomes included rate of repeat healthcare contact for UTI within 14 days and total duration of therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>793 randomly selected patient encounters (397 panel and 396 non-panel) were included. Prescribing was guideline adherent in 79.3% and 64.9% (<i>P</i> < 0.001) of panel and non-panel encounters, respectively. There were more 3- and 5-day treatment courses in the panel cohort; however, inappropriate duration of therapy was the most common reason for non-concordance in both cohorts. There was no significant difference between groups in repeat 14-day healthcare contact for UTI (13.4% panel vs 11.1% no panel, <i>P</i> = 0.34).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of a pre-populated ambulatory order panel for the treatment of cystitis was associated with greater concordance with institutional guidelines, without adversely impacting repeat healthcare contact for UTI.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"5 1","pages":"e96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12022930/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.62","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Optimizing antibiotic prescribing for urinary tract infections (UTI) represents an opportunity for ambulatory antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs). A pre-populated order panel for UTI was implemented in the Mayo Clinic Enterprise in May 2022. The order panel provides antibiotic regimens aligning with institutional guidelines according to patient characteristics, presence or absence of complicating features, and antimicrobial allergy status. We assessed impacts of panel use on prescribing practices for cystitis.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study of ambulatory encounters with a primary diagnosis of cystitis from May 16, 2022, to May 15, 2023, compared encounters in which the order panel was utilized to encounters managed without the panel. The primary outcome was concordance with institutional guidelines, including drug selection, dose/frequency, and duration. Secondary outcomes included rate of repeat healthcare contact for UTI within 14 days and total duration of therapy.

Results: 793 randomly selected patient encounters (397 panel and 396 non-panel) were included. Prescribing was guideline adherent in 79.3% and 64.9% (P < 0.001) of panel and non-panel encounters, respectively. There were more 3- and 5-day treatment courses in the panel cohort; however, inappropriate duration of therapy was the most common reason for non-concordance in both cohorts. There was no significant difference between groups in repeat 14-day healthcare contact for UTI (13.4% panel vs 11.1% no panel, P = 0.34).

Conclusion: Use of a pre-populated ambulatory order panel for the treatment of cystitis was associated with greater concordance with institutional guidelines, without adversely impacting repeat healthcare contact for UTI.

循证顺序小组对门诊膀胱炎患者抗生素处方的影响。
背景:优化尿路感染(UTI)的抗生素处方为门诊抗生素管理计划(asp)提供了机会。2022年5月,梅奥诊所企业实施了一个预先填充的尿路感染订单面板。医嘱小组根据患者特点、是否存在并发症以及抗菌素过敏状况,提供符合机构指南的抗生素方案。我们评估了小组使用对膀胱炎处方实践的影响。方法:这项回顾性队列研究对2022年5月16日至2023年5月15日期间初步诊断为膀胱炎的门诊就诊进行了比较,比较了使用顺序面板的就诊和不使用顺序面板的就诊。主要结局是与机构指南的一致性,包括药物选择、剂量/频率和持续时间。次要结局包括14天内尿路感染的重复医疗接触率和总治疗时间。结果:纳入了793例随机选择的患者接触(397例分组,396例非分组)。处方遵循指南的比例分别为79.3%和64.9% (P < 0.001)。在小组队列中有更多的3天和5天疗程;然而,不适当的治疗时间是两个队列中不一致的最常见原因。在因尿路感染而进行的14天重复医疗接触中,两组之间没有显著差异(13.4%组vs 11.1%无组,P = 0.34)。结论:在膀胱炎治疗中使用预先安排的门诊医嘱小组与机构指南的一致性更高,对尿路感染的重复医疗联系没有不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信