Modifying Digital Occlusal Spacer Effect on the Marginal Gap of Zirconia-reinforced Lithium Silicate Crowns: In-Vitro Scanning Electron Microscopy Evaluation.
Gil Ben-Izhack, Diva Lugassy, Shahd Bishara, Omer Koton, Leon Eliasaf, Joseph Nissan, Asaf Shely
{"title":"Modifying Digital Occlusal Spacer Effect on the Marginal Gap of Zirconia-reinforced Lithium Silicate Crowns: In-Vitro Scanning Electron Microscopy Evaluation.","authors":"Gil Ben-Izhack, Diva Lugassy, Shahd Bishara, Omer Koton, Leon Eliasaf, Joseph Nissan, Asaf Shely","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>the study objective was to evaluate the effect of modifying digital occlusal spacers on the marginal gap of full monolithic zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns by using 4- axis machine.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty-five acrylic teeth with preparation for full crowns were divided into three groups with different occlusal digital spacers (60,90,120 μm). All forty-five abutments were scanned by an intra-oral scanner and a 4-axis machine grinned zirconia reinforced lithium silicate crowns. Each crown was cemented to the abutment by using universal resin cement and for each unit (crown and abutment) a scanning electronic microscope was used to assess the marginal gap. For comparing the marginal gap between the three groups a kolmogorov-smirnov test was performed on the study variables indicated a normal distribution (p>0.05) followed by a one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni test (α=.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total mean marginal gap for 120 µm (101.38 ±17.94 µm) occlusal spacer was found significantly higher compared to the 90 µm (72.84 ±27.21 µm) and 60 µm (60.16 ± 29.34 µm) (p<.05). There was no significant difference between the 90 μm (72.84 ±27.21 µm) and 60 μm (60.16 ± 29.34 µm) groups (p=0.533).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinically acceptable marginal gap (<120 µm) was obtained for all three occlusal spacers (60,90,120). As the digital occlusal spacer reduces the marginal gap reduces as well. Occlusal spacer of 120 µm showed a significantly higher marginal gap compared to 90 and 60 µm. The digital occlusal spacer which should be favorable for zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns is 60 µm.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: the study objective was to evaluate the effect of modifying digital occlusal spacers on the marginal gap of full monolithic zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns by using 4- axis machine.
Materials and methods: Forty-five acrylic teeth with preparation for full crowns were divided into three groups with different occlusal digital spacers (60,90,120 μm). All forty-five abutments were scanned by an intra-oral scanner and a 4-axis machine grinned zirconia reinforced lithium silicate crowns. Each crown was cemented to the abutment by using universal resin cement and for each unit (crown and abutment) a scanning electronic microscope was used to assess the marginal gap. For comparing the marginal gap between the three groups a kolmogorov-smirnov test was performed on the study variables indicated a normal distribution (p>0.05) followed by a one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni test (α=.05).
Results: The total mean marginal gap for 120 µm (101.38 ±17.94 µm) occlusal spacer was found significantly higher compared to the 90 µm (72.84 ±27.21 µm) and 60 µm (60.16 ± 29.34 µm) (p<.05). There was no significant difference between the 90 μm (72.84 ±27.21 µm) and 60 μm (60.16 ± 29.34 µm) groups (p=0.533).
Conclusions: Clinically acceptable marginal gap (<120 µm) was obtained for all three occlusal spacers (60,90,120). As the digital occlusal spacer reduces the marginal gap reduces as well. Occlusal spacer of 120 µm showed a significantly higher marginal gap compared to 90 and 60 µm. The digital occlusal spacer which should be favorable for zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns is 60 µm.