Modifying Digital Occlusal Spacer Effect on the Marginal Gap of Zirconia-reinforced Lithium Silicate Crowns: In-Vitro Scanning Electron Microscopy Evaluation.

Gil Ben-Izhack, Diva Lugassy, Shahd Bishara, Omer Koton, Leon Eliasaf, Joseph Nissan, Asaf Shely
{"title":"Modifying Digital Occlusal Spacer Effect on the Marginal Gap of Zirconia-reinforced Lithium Silicate Crowns: In-Vitro Scanning Electron Microscopy Evaluation.","authors":"Gil Ben-Izhack, Diva Lugassy, Shahd Bishara, Omer Koton, Leon Eliasaf, Joseph Nissan, Asaf Shely","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>the study objective was to evaluate the effect of modifying digital occlusal spacers on the marginal gap of full monolithic zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns by using 4- axis machine.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty-five acrylic teeth with preparation for full crowns were divided into three groups with different occlusal digital spacers (60,90,120 μm). All forty-five abutments were scanned by an intra-oral scanner and a 4-axis machine grinned zirconia reinforced lithium silicate crowns. Each crown was cemented to the abutment by using universal resin cement and for each unit (crown and abutment) a scanning electronic microscope was used to assess the marginal gap. For comparing the marginal gap between the three groups a kolmogorov-smirnov test was performed on the study variables indicated a normal distribution (p>0.05) followed by a one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni test (α=.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total mean marginal gap for 120 µm (101.38 ±17.94 µm) occlusal spacer was found significantly higher compared to the 90 µm (72.84 ±27.21 µm) and 60 µm (60.16 ± 29.34 µm) (p<.05). There was no significant difference between the 90 μm (72.84 ±27.21 µm) and 60 μm (60.16 ± 29.34 µm) groups (p=0.533).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinically acceptable marginal gap (<120 µm) was obtained for all three occlusal spacers (60,90,120). As the digital occlusal spacer reduces the marginal gap reduces as well. Occlusal spacer of 120 µm showed a significantly higher marginal gap compared to 90 and 60 µm. The digital occlusal spacer which should be favorable for zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns is 60 µm.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: the study objective was to evaluate the effect of modifying digital occlusal spacers on the marginal gap of full monolithic zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns by using 4- axis machine.

Materials and methods: Forty-five acrylic teeth with preparation for full crowns were divided into three groups with different occlusal digital spacers (60,90,120 μm). All forty-five abutments were scanned by an intra-oral scanner and a 4-axis machine grinned zirconia reinforced lithium silicate crowns. Each crown was cemented to the abutment by using universal resin cement and for each unit (crown and abutment) a scanning electronic microscope was used to assess the marginal gap. For comparing the marginal gap between the three groups a kolmogorov-smirnov test was performed on the study variables indicated a normal distribution (p>0.05) followed by a one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni test (α=.05).

Results: The total mean marginal gap for 120 µm (101.38 ±17.94 µm) occlusal spacer was found significantly higher compared to the 90 µm (72.84 ±27.21 µm) and 60 µm (60.16 ± 29.34 µm) (p<.05). There was no significant difference between the 90 μm (72.84 ±27.21 µm) and 60 μm (60.16 ± 29.34 µm) groups (p=0.533).

Conclusions: Clinically acceptable marginal gap (<120 µm) was obtained for all three occlusal spacers (60,90,120). As the digital occlusal spacer reduces the marginal gap reduces as well. Occlusal spacer of 120 µm showed a significantly higher marginal gap compared to 90 and 60 µm. The digital occlusal spacer which should be favorable for zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns is 60 µm.

改良数字咬合间隔器对氧化锆增强硅酸锂冠边缘间隙的影响:体外扫描电镜评价。
目的:利用四轴仪评价改良式数字咬合垫对全单片氧化锆增强硅酸锂冠边缘间隙的影响。材料与方法:将45颗预备全冠的丙烯酸牙分为3组,采用不同的咬合数字间隔(60、90、120 μm)。所有45个基牙均通过口腔内扫描仪和四轴机器进行扫描,并对氧化锆增强硅酸锂冠进行研磨。使用通用树脂水泥将每个冠与基台粘合,并对每个单元(冠和基台)使用扫描电子显微镜评估边缘间隙。为了比较三组之间的边际差距,对研究变量进行kolmogorov-smirnov检验,结果显示正态分布(p < 0.05),然后进行单因素方差分析和事后Bonferroni检验(α= 0.05)。结果:与90µm(72.84±27.21µm)和60µm(60.16±29.34µm)牙合间隔器相比,120µm(101.38±17.94µm)牙合间隔器的总平均边缘间隙明显增加(p结论:临床可接受的边缘间隙(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信