Comparing Rotational Stability Over Time Between Four Monofocal Toric Intraocular Lenses.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2025-04-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S522728
Peter Hoffmann, Richard Potvin, Robert D Anello, Fritz Hengerer, Gerd Auffarth, Yves Guldenfels, Eckart Bertelmann, Ramon Ruiz Mesa, Isaak Fischinger, Sandra Krawczyk, Berthold Seitz, David Antolin-Garcia, Stefanie Schmickler, Louis Hoffart, Thomas Kohnen, Alvin S Relucio
{"title":"Comparing Rotational Stability Over Time Between Four Monofocal Toric Intraocular Lenses.","authors":"Peter Hoffmann, Richard Potvin, Robert D Anello, Fritz Hengerer, Gerd Auffarth, Yves Guldenfels, Eckart Bertelmann, Ramon Ruiz Mesa, Isaak Fischinger, Sandra Krawczyk, Berthold Seitz, David Antolin-Garcia, Stefanie Schmickler, Louis Hoffart, Thomas Kohnen, Alvin S Relucio","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S522728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the rotational stability of four different monofocal toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) from surgery to 4-6 months postoperative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a subset of data from a prospective multi-center randomized clinical study. High resolution retro-illuminated images of eyes implanted with four different toric IOLs were obtained immediately after surgery, and at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 4-6 months after surgery. Fixed scleral features were identified in the surgical image. An independent reading center evaluated the orientation of the IOL from all images, based on the angle between the toric axis marks and these fixed scleral landmarks. Rotational stability was determined by calculating differences in orientation between visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Digital images from 299 eyes implanted with one of the four IOLs were available for analysis. Orientation data were successfully determined in about 90% of images. Biometry and IOL orientation were not significantly associated with IOL rotation. The Vivinex lens showed the lowest absolute rotation, with a mean value less than 1.5 degrees at all time intervals measured, with a maximum standard deviation of 1.4 degrees. The AcrySof lens was next lowest, with an absolute rotation below two degrees for all intervals. Mean absolute rotation for the Tecnis lens was significantly higher than for the other IOLs (>2 degrees for all intervals). For the AcrySof and Vivinex lenses, there were no reported rotations >10 degrees for any interval; 97% or more of results were <5 degrees, compared to 93% for the AT Torbi lens and 90% for the Tecnis lens. Only 6 lenses (4 Tecnis: 8.3%, 2 AT Torbi: 4.3%) had a rotation > 10 degrees at any time point.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rotational stability appeared excellent for the Vivinex and AcrySof toric IOLs, with slightly more variable performance evident with the AT Torbi and Tecnis IOLs.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"1345-1355"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036338/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S522728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the rotational stability of four different monofocal toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) from surgery to 4-6 months postoperative.

Methods: This was a subset of data from a prospective multi-center randomized clinical study. High resolution retro-illuminated images of eyes implanted with four different toric IOLs were obtained immediately after surgery, and at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 4-6 months after surgery. Fixed scleral features were identified in the surgical image. An independent reading center evaluated the orientation of the IOL from all images, based on the angle between the toric axis marks and these fixed scleral landmarks. Rotational stability was determined by calculating differences in orientation between visits.

Results: Digital images from 299 eyes implanted with one of the four IOLs were available for analysis. Orientation data were successfully determined in about 90% of images. Biometry and IOL orientation were not significantly associated with IOL rotation. The Vivinex lens showed the lowest absolute rotation, with a mean value less than 1.5 degrees at all time intervals measured, with a maximum standard deviation of 1.4 degrees. The AcrySof lens was next lowest, with an absolute rotation below two degrees for all intervals. Mean absolute rotation for the Tecnis lens was significantly higher than for the other IOLs (>2 degrees for all intervals). For the AcrySof and Vivinex lenses, there were no reported rotations >10 degrees for any interval; 97% or more of results were <5 degrees, compared to 93% for the AT Torbi lens and 90% for the Tecnis lens. Only 6 lenses (4 Tecnis: 8.3%, 2 AT Torbi: 4.3%) had a rotation > 10 degrees at any time point.

Conclusion: Rotational stability appeared excellent for the Vivinex and AcrySof toric IOLs, with slightly more variable performance evident with the AT Torbi and Tecnis IOLs.

比较四种单焦环形人工晶状体的旋转稳定性。
目的:评价4种不同单焦环形人工晶状体(iol)术后4 ~ 6个月的旋转稳定性。方法:这是一项前瞻性多中心随机临床研究的数据子集。术后即刻、术后1天、1周、1个月和术后4-6个月获得四种不同环形人工晶状体植入眼的高分辨率逆光图像。在手术图像中识别出固定的巩膜特征。一个独立的阅读中心根据旋转轴标记和这些固定巩膜标记之间的角度评估所有图像中的人工晶体的方向。旋转稳定性是通过计算访问之间的取向差异来确定的。结果:299只眼植入其中一种人工晶状体的数字图像可用于分析。在大约90%的图像中成功地确定了方向数据。生物测量和人工晶状体定位与人工晶状体旋转无显著相关性。Vivinex晶状体的绝对旋转最小,在所有测量时间间隔内的平均值小于1.5度,最大标准偏差为1.4度。AcrySof镜头是第二低的,所有间隔的绝对旋转都低于2度。Tecnis人工晶状体的平均绝对旋转度明显高于其他人工晶状体(在所有时间间隔内均为0.2度)。对于acryysof和Vivinex镜片,在任何间隔内都没有报告旋转超过10度;97%或更多的结果在任何时间点都是10度。结论:Vivinex和acryysof环形人工晶状体具有良好的旋转稳定性,而AT Torbi和Tecnis人工晶状体的旋转稳定性略有变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信