A Scoping Review of Evidence-Based Grief Interventions for Parentally Bereaved Children: Comparing Individual, Group, and Family Approaches.

Omega Pub Date : 2025-04-14 DOI:10.1177/00302228251334249
Marcus Gottlieb, Dominic Violo, Jacqueline Tams, Jamie Piercy
{"title":"A Scoping Review of Evidence-Based Grief Interventions for Parentally Bereaved Children: Comparing Individual, Group, and Family Approaches.","authors":"Marcus Gottlieb, Dominic Violo, Jacqueline Tams, Jamie Piercy","doi":"10.1177/00302228251334249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This scoping review examines and compares the effectiveness of different intervention formats for parentally bereaved children by focusing on three therapeutic formats: individual, group, and family-based approaches. Using the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we analyzed ten peer-reviewed quantitative studies published between 2010 and 2022. This study emphasizes formal interventions with measurable outcomes, excluding creative or symbolic approaches such as art and ritual-based therapies. This review highlights that individual interventions, particularly cognitive-behavioural techniques, significantly reduce critical deficits such as prolonged grief disorder and PTSD symptoms. Group approaches foster social connection and emotional regulation, while family interventions emphasize improved family communication and caregiver support. Notable limitations include small sample sizes, heterogeneity in program structure, and reliance on self-reported outcomes. Future research should explore diverse grief experiences, longer-term impacts, and cultural considerations. This review provides insights into tailoring interventions to the unique needs of bereaved children, aiding practitioners in selecting evidence-based approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":74338,"journal":{"name":"Omega","volume":" ","pages":"302228251334249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228251334249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This scoping review examines and compares the effectiveness of different intervention formats for parentally bereaved children by focusing on three therapeutic formats: individual, group, and family-based approaches. Using the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we analyzed ten peer-reviewed quantitative studies published between 2010 and 2022. This study emphasizes formal interventions with measurable outcomes, excluding creative or symbolic approaches such as art and ritual-based therapies. This review highlights that individual interventions, particularly cognitive-behavioural techniques, significantly reduce critical deficits such as prolonged grief disorder and PTSD symptoms. Group approaches foster social connection and emotional regulation, while family interventions emphasize improved family communication and caregiver support. Notable limitations include small sample sizes, heterogeneity in program structure, and reliance on self-reported outcomes. Future research should explore diverse grief experiences, longer-term impacts, and cultural considerations. This review provides insights into tailoring interventions to the unique needs of bereaved children, aiding practitioners in selecting evidence-based approaches.

基于证据的丧亲儿童悲伤干预的范围回顾:比较个人、团体和家庭方法。
本综述通过关注三种治疗形式:个人、团体和基于家庭的方法,检查并比较了不同干预形式对父母丧亲儿童的有效性。使用PRISMA-ScR指南,我们分析了2010年至2022年间发表的10项同行评议的定量研究。这项研究强调具有可测量结果的正式干预,排除创造性或象征性的方法,如艺术和基于仪式的治疗。这篇综述强调了个体干预,特别是认知行为技术,可以显著减少关键缺陷,如延长悲伤障碍和创伤后应激障碍症状。团体方法促进社会联系和情绪调节,而家庭干预强调改善家庭沟通和照顾者的支持。值得注意的局限性包括样本量小、项目结构的异质性以及对自我报告结果的依赖。未来的研究应该探索不同的悲伤经历、长期影响和文化因素。这篇综述提供了针对失去亲人的儿童的独特需求定制干预措施的见解,帮助从业者选择基于证据的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信