Integrated early palliative care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: The GLIOSUPPORT feasibility study.

IF 3.7 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neuro-oncology advances Pub Date : 2025-03-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/noajnl/vdaf064
Michel Fabbro, Muriel Thomaso, Amélie Darlix, Virginie Perotin, Caroline Gallay, Marie Charissoux, Anne-Chantal Granier, Nabila Bouazza, Patrice Champoiral, Louise Coutant, Marta Jarlier, Estelle Guerdoux
{"title":"Integrated early palliative care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: The GLIOSUPPORT feasibility study.","authors":"Michel Fabbro, Muriel Thomaso, Amélie Darlix, Virginie Perotin, Caroline Gallay, Marie Charissoux, Anne-Chantal Granier, Nabila Bouazza, Patrice Champoiral, Louise Coutant, Marta Jarlier, Estelle Guerdoux","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early palliative care improves the quality of life (QoL) and survival in patients with cancer; however, its effects in patients with glioblastoma remain unclear. The GLIOSUPPORT study assessed the feasibility (adherence; primary objective) of an early palliative care program integrated into the standard glioblastoma care pathway. Secondary objectives included the description of the patients' characteristics, QoL, and neuropsychological changes over time, end-of-life decisions, end-of-life treatments, and family carers' perceptions/experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This interventional, prospective, longitudinal, feasibility study was conducted in a French comprehensive cancer center. Thirty-five patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were required to reach an adherence rate of 60%. Adherence was defined as going to 3 palliative care visits scheduled every 12 weeks. Baseline characteristics were compared in patients who did and did not adhere to the palliative care program. Minimal clinically important differences and cut-offs were used to quantify QoL changes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The adherence rate was 60% (95% CI [42.1%-76.1%]), indicating that the program was feasible. Visual disturbances, communication/initiation deficits, and anxiety were more frequent in the group that did not adhere to the program. Emotional and social functioning, pain, appetite loss, constipation, and headache increased over time (clinically significant differences), whereas neuropsychological disturbances did not change. Half of the participants identified a family proxy and 8.6% wrote advance directives. One month before death, 28.6% of patients were receiving cancer treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrating early palliative care in glioblastoma management is feasible. The potential benefits on QoL, mood, and survival must now be evaluated in a larger randomized controlled trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"7 1","pages":"vdaf064"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063082/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaf064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early palliative care improves the quality of life (QoL) and survival in patients with cancer; however, its effects in patients with glioblastoma remain unclear. The GLIOSUPPORT study assessed the feasibility (adherence; primary objective) of an early palliative care program integrated into the standard glioblastoma care pathway. Secondary objectives included the description of the patients' characteristics, QoL, and neuropsychological changes over time, end-of-life decisions, end-of-life treatments, and family carers' perceptions/experiences.

Methods: This interventional, prospective, longitudinal, feasibility study was conducted in a French comprehensive cancer center. Thirty-five patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were required to reach an adherence rate of 60%. Adherence was defined as going to 3 palliative care visits scheduled every 12 weeks. Baseline characteristics were compared in patients who did and did not adhere to the palliative care program. Minimal clinically important differences and cut-offs were used to quantify QoL changes.

Results: The adherence rate was 60% (95% CI [42.1%-76.1%]), indicating that the program was feasible. Visual disturbances, communication/initiation deficits, and anxiety were more frequent in the group that did not adhere to the program. Emotional and social functioning, pain, appetite loss, constipation, and headache increased over time (clinically significant differences), whereas neuropsychological disturbances did not change. Half of the participants identified a family proxy and 8.6% wrote advance directives. One month before death, 28.6% of patients were receiving cancer treatment.

Conclusions: Integrating early palliative care in glioblastoma management is feasible. The potential benefits on QoL, mood, and survival must now be evaluated in a larger randomized controlled trial.

新诊断的胶质母细胞瘤患者的综合早期姑息治疗:GLIOSUPPORT可行性研究
背景:早期姑息治疗可改善癌症患者的生活质量(QoL)和生存率;然而,其在胶质母细胞瘤患者中的作用尚不清楚。GLIOSUPPORT研究评估了可行性(依从性;早期姑息治疗方案整合到标准胶质母细胞瘤治疗途径的主要目标。次要目标包括描述患者的特征、生活质量和随时间的神经心理变化、临终决定、临终治疗和家庭照顾者的看法/经历。方法:在法国某综合性癌症中心进行介入性、前瞻性、纵向、可行性研究。35名新诊断的胶质母细胞瘤患者需要达到60%的依从率。依从性被定义为每12周进行3次姑息治疗访问。基线特征的比较患者谁做了和没有坚持姑息治疗方案。最小临床重要差异和截止值用于量化生活质量变化。结果:依从率为60% (95% CI[42.1% ~ 76.1%]),表明方案可行。视觉障碍,沟通/启动缺陷和焦虑在没有坚持该计划的小组中更常见。情绪和社会功能、疼痛、食欲不振、便秘和头痛随着时间的推移而增加(临床显著差异),而神经心理障碍没有改变。一半的参与者确定了家庭代理人,8.6%的人写了事先指示。在死亡前一个月,28.6%的患者正在接受癌症治疗。结论:将早期姑息治疗纳入胶质母细胞瘤治疗是可行的。对生活质量、情绪和生存的潜在益处现在必须在一个更大的随机对照试验中进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信