Revisiting the classical biodiversity-ecosystem functioning and stability relationships in microbial microcosms.

IF 2.2 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PNAS nexus Pub Date : 2025-04-05 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf114
Jiesi Lei, Jiajie Feng, Junjun Ding, Yunfeng Yang
{"title":"Revisiting the classical biodiversity-ecosystem functioning and stability relationships in microbial microcosms.","authors":"Jiesi Lei, Jiajie Feng, Junjun Ding, Yunfeng Yang","doi":"10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The question of how biodiversity influences ecosystem functioning and stability has been a central focus in ecological research. Yet, this question remains unresolved, primarily because of the widely divergent definitions of functioning, stability, and diversity. Consequently, forecasts of ecosystem services will remain speculative until we can establish more precise and comprehensive definitions for these concepts than previously. Here, we investigated how the maximum specific growth rate, productivity, mortality rate, and species interaction in microbial communities vary with a diversity gradient ranging from 1 to 16 species under control conditions, starvation, or saline stress. We found that diversity played a critical role in maintaining community growth and stability under control conditions, with higher diversity associated with increased maximum specific growth rate and decreased mortality rate. However, higher diversity was associated with an increased mortality rate under starvation, while diversity did not affect the mortality rate under saline stress. Diversity stabilized microbial productivity only under control conditions, defying the \"diversity begets stability\" hypothesis under stress. Beneficial interactions among species were prevalent in most samples, but species interaction increased mortality rates under starvation. Our findings suggest that while biodiversity is crucial for preserving ecosystem functioning and stability, the presence of multiple definitions and contextual dependence on environmental conditions argues against any general relationship between diversity and ecosystem functioning/stability. Furthermore, we provide new insights into the longstanding debate surrounding the \"diversity begets stability\" hypothesis and the \"diversity destabilizes ecosystem\" hypothesis in that diversity begets stability under control conditions but destabilizes ecosystems under severe stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":74468,"journal":{"name":"PNAS nexus","volume":"4 4","pages":"pgaf114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12038814/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PNAS nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The question of how biodiversity influences ecosystem functioning and stability has been a central focus in ecological research. Yet, this question remains unresolved, primarily because of the widely divergent definitions of functioning, stability, and diversity. Consequently, forecasts of ecosystem services will remain speculative until we can establish more precise and comprehensive definitions for these concepts than previously. Here, we investigated how the maximum specific growth rate, productivity, mortality rate, and species interaction in microbial communities vary with a diversity gradient ranging from 1 to 16 species under control conditions, starvation, or saline stress. We found that diversity played a critical role in maintaining community growth and stability under control conditions, with higher diversity associated with increased maximum specific growth rate and decreased mortality rate. However, higher diversity was associated with an increased mortality rate under starvation, while diversity did not affect the mortality rate under saline stress. Diversity stabilized microbial productivity only under control conditions, defying the "diversity begets stability" hypothesis under stress. Beneficial interactions among species were prevalent in most samples, but species interaction increased mortality rates under starvation. Our findings suggest that while biodiversity is crucial for preserving ecosystem functioning and stability, the presence of multiple definitions and contextual dependence on environmental conditions argues against any general relationship between diversity and ecosystem functioning/stability. Furthermore, we provide new insights into the longstanding debate surrounding the "diversity begets stability" hypothesis and the "diversity destabilizes ecosystem" hypothesis in that diversity begets stability under control conditions but destabilizes ecosystems under severe stress.

重新审视微生物微观世界中经典的生物多样性-生态系统功能和稳定性关系。
生物多样性如何影响生态系统的功能和稳定性一直是生态学研究的焦点。然而,这个问题仍未得到解决,主要是因为对功能、稳定性和多样性的定义存在很大分歧。因此,在我们能够为这些概念建立比以前更精确和全面的定义之前,对生态系统服务的预测将仍然是推测性的。在这里,我们研究了在对照条件、饥饿或盐胁迫下,微生物群落的最大特定生长率、生产力、死亡率和物种相互作用如何在1到16种多样性梯度范围内变化。研究发现,在控制条件下,多样性对维持群落生长和稳定起着至关重要的作用,多样性越高,最大特定生长率越高,死亡率越低。然而,较高的多样性与饥饿下的死亡率增加有关,而多样性对盐水胁迫下的死亡率没有影响。只有在控制条件下,多样性才能稳定微生物的生产力,这违背了“多样性产生稳定性”的假设。物种间的有益相互作用在大多数样本中普遍存在,但物种相互作用增加了饥饿下的死亡率。我们的研究结果表明,尽管生物多样性对于维持生态系统的功能和稳定至关重要,但多样性的多重定义和对环境条件的依赖不利于多样性与生态系统功能/稳定性之间的一般关系。此外,我们为围绕“多样性带来稳定性”假说和“多样性破坏生态系统稳定”假说的长期争论提供了新的见解,因为多样性在控制条件下产生稳定性,但在严重压力下破坏生态系统的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信