Digitalization of Nuclear Medicine in Germany - Status Quo 2024.

Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-17 DOI:10.1055/a-2502-1728
Thomas Wendler, Julian Manuel Michael Rogasch, Moritz B Bastian, Wolfgang Burchert, Dirk Hellwig, Lena Kaiser, Philipp Lohmann, Florian Rosar, Benedikt Schemmer, Johannes Tran-Gia, Isabelle Miederer
{"title":"Digitalization of Nuclear Medicine in Germany - Status Quo 2024.","authors":"Thomas Wendler, Julian Manuel Michael Rogasch, Moritz B Bastian, Wolfgang Burchert, Dirk Hellwig, Lena Kaiser, Philipp Lohmann, Florian Rosar, Benedikt Schemmer, Johannes Tran-Gia, Isabelle Miederer","doi":"10.1055/a-2502-1728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digitalization in the healthcare sector is becoming increasingly widespread. Yet, the degree of digitalization in nuclear medicine has not been systematically investigated. The \"Digitalization and AI\" working group of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine conducted a survey to assess the status quo of digitalization of the nuclear medicine health infrastructure in Germany.100 questions were defined on eleven topics covering the main work processes in nuclear medicine. The survey primarily included single-select multiple-choice questions, yes-no questions on the availability of specific digital structures and processes, and questions assessing the degree of digitalization of certain processes and current satisfaction. The level of satisfaction was measured with an ordinal scale (1, very good to 5, poor).In most subject areas, processes relied on a combination of paper-based and electronic procedures for the topics analyzed. Differences in satisfaction regarding the different types of processes for any of the questions were not observed, and the overall level of satisfaction among responding sites was quite high.The survey did not reveal a clear need of the responding sites for complete digitalization of clinical processes. Yet, the participants highlighted the lack of proper Wi-Fi (60%) and the desire for a platform for communication between hospitals, registered doctors and patients (74%). Nevertheless, it is important to take a focused and unbiased look at the daily clinical procedures in every institution and place it in the frame of the existing tools or solutions of peer institutions to discover aspects of digitalization that can create added value in terms of time efficiency, integrity and sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":94161,"journal":{"name":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","volume":"64 2","pages":"156-162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020657/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2502-1728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digitalization in the healthcare sector is becoming increasingly widespread. Yet, the degree of digitalization in nuclear medicine has not been systematically investigated. The "Digitalization and AI" working group of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine conducted a survey to assess the status quo of digitalization of the nuclear medicine health infrastructure in Germany.100 questions were defined on eleven topics covering the main work processes in nuclear medicine. The survey primarily included single-select multiple-choice questions, yes-no questions on the availability of specific digital structures and processes, and questions assessing the degree of digitalization of certain processes and current satisfaction. The level of satisfaction was measured with an ordinal scale (1, very good to 5, poor).In most subject areas, processes relied on a combination of paper-based and electronic procedures for the topics analyzed. Differences in satisfaction regarding the different types of processes for any of the questions were not observed, and the overall level of satisfaction among responding sites was quite high.The survey did not reveal a clear need of the responding sites for complete digitalization of clinical processes. Yet, the participants highlighted the lack of proper Wi-Fi (60%) and the desire for a platform for communication between hospitals, registered doctors and patients (74%). Nevertheless, it is important to take a focused and unbiased look at the daily clinical procedures in every institution and place it in the frame of the existing tools or solutions of peer institutions to discover aspects of digitalization that can create added value in terms of time efficiency, integrity and sustainability.

德国核医学数字化-现状2024。
医疗保健行业的数字化正变得越来越普遍。然而,核医学的数字化程度尚未得到系统的研究。德国核医学学会的“数字化和人工智能”工作组进行了一项调查,以评估德国核医学卫生基础设施数字化的现状,并就涵盖核医学主要工作流程的11个主题确定了100个问题。该调查主要包括单项选择题、关于特定数字结构和流程的可用性的是-否问题,以及评估某些流程的数字化程度和当前满意度的问题。满意度是用一个序数来衡量的(1,非常好到5,差)。在大多数学科领域,对所分析的主题,过程依赖于纸质和电子程序的结合。没有观察到对任何问题的不同类型的过程的满意度差异,并且在响应站点之间的总体满意度水平相当高。调查并没有显示出对临床过程完全数字化的响应站点的明确需求。然而,参与者强调缺乏适当的Wi-Fi(60%),以及希望医院、注册医生和患者之间有一个沟通平台(74%)。然而,重要的是要集中和公正地看待每个机构的日常临床程序,并将其置于同行机构现有工具或解决方案的框架中,以发现可以在时间效率、完整性和可持续性方面创造附加值的数字化方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信