Cohort Differences in Perceived Discrimination Trajectories among Aging Black Americans.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Collin W Mueller, Carlos D Tavares, Katrina M Walsemann
{"title":"Cohort Differences in Perceived Discrimination Trajectories among Aging Black Americans.","authors":"Collin W Mueller, Carlos D Tavares, Katrina M Walsemann","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbaf077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examines how later-life perceptions of everyday discrimination vary as a function of cohort-level differences in exposure to three distinct racialized social systems across historical time (i.e., whether individuals experienced childhood and early adolescence during the Pre-Brown v Board Era, Protest Era, or Colorblind Era).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the Health and Retirement Study to estimate age-specific trajectories in 5-item Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS-5) scores and counts of discriminatory situations among aging Black Americans. We then examined the likelihood of trajectory group membership as a function of cohort-level differences using multinomial logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings provide evidence of variation in EDS-5 score trajectories and in counts of discriminatory situation trajectories across birth cohorts. After adjustments, relative to members of the pre-Brown cohort, members of the Protest cohort are statistically significantly more likely to be members of the trajectory group characterized by high and rapidly declining levels of EDS-5 scores relative to a trajectory characterized by modest and declining EDS-5 scores. We found more evidence for variation in situational trajectory group membership across birth cohorts; however, this variation did not correspond with a clear pattern in terms of younger cohorts consistently experiencing either more or less discriminatory situations than their older counterparts.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study underscores the importance of examining perceived discrimination using multiple measurement approaches and efforts to disentangle the role of exposure to historically-varying racialized social systems in contributing to perceptions of unfair treatment at older ages.</p>","PeriodicalId":56111,"journal":{"name":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaf077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study examines how later-life perceptions of everyday discrimination vary as a function of cohort-level differences in exposure to three distinct racialized social systems across historical time (i.e., whether individuals experienced childhood and early adolescence during the Pre-Brown v Board Era, Protest Era, or Colorblind Era).

Methods: We used the Health and Retirement Study to estimate age-specific trajectories in 5-item Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS-5) scores and counts of discriminatory situations among aging Black Americans. We then examined the likelihood of trajectory group membership as a function of cohort-level differences using multinomial logistic regression.

Results: Findings provide evidence of variation in EDS-5 score trajectories and in counts of discriminatory situation trajectories across birth cohorts. After adjustments, relative to members of the pre-Brown cohort, members of the Protest cohort are statistically significantly more likely to be members of the trajectory group characterized by high and rapidly declining levels of EDS-5 scores relative to a trajectory characterized by modest and declining EDS-5 scores. We found more evidence for variation in situational trajectory group membership across birth cohorts; however, this variation did not correspond with a clear pattern in terms of younger cohorts consistently experiencing either more or less discriminatory situations than their older counterparts.

Discussion: This study underscores the importance of examining perceived discrimination using multiple measurement approaches and efforts to disentangle the role of exposure to historically-varying racialized social systems in contributing to perceptions of unfair treatment at older ages.

老年美国黑人感知歧视轨迹的队列差异。
目的:本研究考察了在不同的历史时期(即,个人是否在布朗诉委员会时代、抗议时代或色盲时代经历过童年和青春期早期),暴露于三种不同的种族化社会制度中的队列水平差异如何影响晚年对日常歧视的感知。方法:我们使用健康与退休研究来估计美国老年黑人在5项日常歧视量表(EDS-5)得分和歧视情况计数中的年龄特异性轨迹。然后,我们使用多项逻辑回归检验了轨迹群体成员的可能性作为队列水平差异的函数。结果:研究结果提供了出生队列中EDS-5评分轨迹和歧视情况轨迹计数变化的证据。调整后,相对于前布朗队列的成员,抗议队列的成员在统计上更有可能成为以EDS-5分数高而迅速下降为特征的轨迹组的成员,而不是以适度和下降为特征的轨迹组的成员。我们发现了更多的证据,证明了出生队列中情境轨迹群体成员的变化;然而,这种变化并不符合一个明确的模式,即年轻群体始终比年长群体经历更多或更少的歧视情况。讨论:本研究强调了使用多种测量方法检查感知到的歧视的重要性,并努力理清暴露于历史上不同的种族化社会制度在促进老年人感知不公平待遇方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.10%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences publishes articles on development in adulthood and old age that advance the psychological science of aging processes and outcomes. Articles have clear implications for theoretical or methodological innovation in the psychology of aging or contribute significantly to the empirical understanding of psychological processes and aging. Areas of interest include, but are not limited to, attitudes, clinical applications, cognition, education, emotion, health, human factors, interpersonal relations, neuropsychology, perception, personality, physiological psychology, social psychology, and sensation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信