Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Medicare Reimbursement and Glaucoma Procedure Utilization: APayment-VolumeElasticity and Trends Analysis.

Q2 Medicine
Jason Dossantos, Hoang-Viet Tran, Sinan Akosman, Julie Thomasian, David Belyea
{"title":"Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Medicare Reimbursement and Glaucoma Procedure Utilization: APayment-VolumeElasticity and Trends Analysis.","authors":"Jason Dossantos, Hoang-Viet Tran, Sinan Akosman, Julie Thomasian, David Belyea","doi":"10.1016/j.ogla.2025.03.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine how the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic impacted the relationship between Medicare reimbursement and glaucoma procedure service volume in the United States.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective, longitudinal database study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A complete dataset of all glaucoma procedures performed on Medicare Part B beneficiaries from 2019 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Linear mixed-effects model using Medicare Part B data, controlling for year, charges, denials, reimbursement-to-charge ratio (RCR), service setting, Current Procedural Terminology code, state, Medicare population, number of ophthalmologists, and median income. The RCR was calculated as the ratio of weighted mean reimbursement to weighted mean charge, representing the proportion of reimbursed charges. Weighted averages for denials, charges, and reimbursements (adjusted for inflation) were also calculated.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Payment-volume elasticities, defined as the percent change in procedure volume per 1% change in Medicare payment, for traditional glaucoma surgeries (tubes and shunts), minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGSs), and laser procedures. Additional measures included weighted averages of charges, reimbursements, denials, and RCR across procedure categories and service settings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Traditional surgeries showed a 2.3% decrease in volume per 1% payment increase (95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.9% to -1.7%; P < 0.001; Rc<sup>2</sup> = 0.89) and a 10.2% decline in volume. Mean reimbursement for traditional surgeries decreased by 5%, with a 7.7% drop in RCR. Laser procedures exhibited a 6.7% volume decrease per 1% payment increase (95% CI: -7.1% to -6.2%; P < 0.001; Rc<sup>2</sup> = 0.97) and a 16% total decline, with no change in RCR. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries declined by 16.2% overall but demonstrated an 8.3% volume increase per 1% payment rise (95% CI: 7.9%-8.7%; P < 0.001; Rc<sup>2</sup> = 0.90), with a 64% improvement in RCR. Overall, glaucoma procedure volumes fell by 15.6%, mean reimbursement decreased by 7.3%, and denied claims increased by 46.7%. Ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) experienced a 15.2% volume decline but an 11.5% increase in reimbursement, supported by a 42.9% rise in RCR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Glaucoma procedure volumes declined between 2019 and 2022, particularly for traditional surgeries and MIGS. Traditional and laser procedures had negative payment-volume elasticities, whereas MIGS showed positive elasticity. These findings suggest factors beyond reimbursement rates, like shifts to less invasive treatments and COVID-19 disruptions, significantly influenced clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Financial disclosure(s): </strong>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":56368,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogla.2025.03.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To examine how the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic impacted the relationship between Medicare reimbursement and glaucoma procedure service volume in the United States.

Design: A retrospective, longitudinal database study.

Participants: A complete dataset of all glaucoma procedures performed on Medicare Part B beneficiaries from 2019 to 2022.

Methods: Linear mixed-effects model using Medicare Part B data, controlling for year, charges, denials, reimbursement-to-charge ratio (RCR), service setting, Current Procedural Terminology code, state, Medicare population, number of ophthalmologists, and median income. The RCR was calculated as the ratio of weighted mean reimbursement to weighted mean charge, representing the proportion of reimbursed charges. Weighted averages for denials, charges, and reimbursements (adjusted for inflation) were also calculated.

Main outcome measures: Payment-volume elasticities, defined as the percent change in procedure volume per 1% change in Medicare payment, for traditional glaucoma surgeries (tubes and shunts), minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGSs), and laser procedures. Additional measures included weighted averages of charges, reimbursements, denials, and RCR across procedure categories and service settings.

Results: Traditional surgeries showed a 2.3% decrease in volume per 1% payment increase (95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.9% to -1.7%; P < 0.001; Rc2 = 0.89) and a 10.2% decline in volume. Mean reimbursement for traditional surgeries decreased by 5%, with a 7.7% drop in RCR. Laser procedures exhibited a 6.7% volume decrease per 1% payment increase (95% CI: -7.1% to -6.2%; P < 0.001; Rc2 = 0.97) and a 16% total decline, with no change in RCR. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries declined by 16.2% overall but demonstrated an 8.3% volume increase per 1% payment rise (95% CI: 7.9%-8.7%; P < 0.001; Rc2 = 0.90), with a 64% improvement in RCR. Overall, glaucoma procedure volumes fell by 15.6%, mean reimbursement decreased by 7.3%, and denied claims increased by 46.7%. Ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) experienced a 15.2% volume decline but an 11.5% increase in reimbursement, supported by a 42.9% rise in RCR.

Conclusions: Glaucoma procedure volumes declined between 2019 and 2022, particularly for traditional surgeries and MIGS. Traditional and laser procedures had negative payment-volume elasticities, whereas MIGS showed positive elasticity. These findings suggest factors beyond reimbursement rates, like shifts to less invasive treatments and COVID-19 disruptions, significantly influenced clinical decision-making.

Financial disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

COVID-19对医疗保险报销和青光眼手术使用的影响:支付量弹性和趋势分析。
目的:研究COVID-19大流行如何影响美国医疗保险报销与青光眼手术服务量之间的关系。设计:回顾性、纵向数据库研究。参与者:2019年至2022年医疗保险B部分受益人进行的所有青光眼手术的完整数据集。方法:采用医疗保险B部分数据建立线性混合效应模型,控制年、收费、拒绝、报销收费比(RCR)、服务设置、CPT代码、州、医疗保险人口、眼科医生人数和收入中位数。RCR计算为加权平均报销与加权平均费用之比,表示报销费用的比例。还计算了拒绝、收费和报销(根据通货膨胀调整)的加权平均值。主要结局指标:支付量弹性,定义为传统青光眼手术(导管和分流)、微创青光眼手术(MIGS)和激光手术的每1%医疗保险支付变化的手术量变化百分比。其他措施包括加权平均收费,报销,拒绝,和RCR跨程序类别和服务设置。结果:传统手术中,每增加1%的费用,体积减少2.3% (95% CI: -2.9% ~ -1.7%;P < 0.001;Rc2 = 0.89),销量下降10.2%。传统手术的平均报销下降了5%,RCR下降了7.7%。每增加1%的费用,激光手术的体积就会减少6.7% (95% CI: -7.1%至-6.2%;P < 0.001;Rc2 = 0.97),总体下降16%,RCR无变化。MIGS总体下降了16%,但每增加1%的付款,其交易量增长了8.3% (95% CI: 7.9%至8.7%;P < 0.001;Rc2 = 0.90), RCR改善64%。总体而言,青光眼手术数量下降了15.6%,平均报销减少了7.3%,拒绝索赔增加了46.7%。ASCs的业务量下降了15.2%,但报销额增加了11.5%,RCR增加了39.7%。结论:2019-2022年青光眼手术数量下降,特别是传统手术和MIGS手术。传统方法和激光方法的支付量弹性为负,而MIGS方法的支付量弹性为正。这些发现表明,报销率以外的因素,如转向侵入性较小的治疗和COVID-19中断,显著影响了临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
140
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信