Redefining and solving the digital divide and exclusion to improve healthcare: going beyond access to include availability, adequacy, acceptability, and affordability.

IF 3.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2025-04-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1508686
Laronda A Hollimon, Kayla V Taylor, Rachel Fiegenbaum, Mary Carrasco, Laurent Garchitorena Gomez, Debbie Chung, Azizi A Seixas
{"title":"Redefining and solving the digital divide and exclusion to improve healthcare: going beyond access to include availability, adequacy, acceptability, and affordability.","authors":"Laronda A Hollimon, Kayla V Taylor, Rachel Fiegenbaum, Mary Carrasco, Laurent Garchitorena Gomez, Debbie Chung, Azizi A Seixas","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1508686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The digital divide in the United States extends beyond the traditional definition of access, which focuses solely on physical infrastructure like broadband networks and connectivity points. This narrow framing has resulted in policies that fail to address the full spectrum of barriers to digital inclusion. To bridge this gap, we propose the Rhizomatic Digital Ecosystem Framework, which emphasizes five interdependent components: access, availability, adequacy, acceptability and affordability. Access highlights the need for physical infrastructure, with programs like the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Program expanding connectivity to underserved areas. Availability ensures the presence of reliable internet infrastructure to meet community needs, with targeted policies like satellite-based solutions addressing challenges in rural and Indigenous areas. Availability policies should focus on federal funding programs like BEAD and the Tribal Broadband Connectivity Program, incentivizing Internet service Providers (ISP) to expand into underserved areas, and leveraging satellite technologies to address infrastructure gaps. Novel policies to address the digital divide include community-owned broadband networks, dynamic spectrum sharing, and blockchain-powered micro-networks to improve availability in underserved areas. Adequacy examines whether internet services meet modern demands, such as telehealth and online education, emphasizing the need for minimum speed standards and performance improvements. Adequacy policies should include enforcing FCC speed standards with regular audits, requiring ISPs to upgrade outdated infrastructure, and providing government grants to improve broadband quality in communities. For adequacy, solutions like AI-driven broadband performance monitoring, funding edge computing in remote regions, and treating broadband as a public utility can enhance internet speed and quality Acceptability tackles cultural and social barriers, including digital literacy gaps, language differences, and technophobia, which can be addressed through localized literacy programs and inclusive design practices. Acceptability policies should prioritize national digital literacy campaigns for underserved groups, mandate inclusive design and accessibility standards, and offer multilingual and culturally relevant resources for digital tools. Affordability addresses financial barriers, as many low-income households struggle to afford monthly internet fees and devices, even with subsidies such as the Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP). To improve acceptability, innovative approaches like universal digital literacy vouchers, gamified education platforms, and mandatory accessibility standards for all digital technologies can ensure equitable and inclusive digital participation. Together, these five dimensions provide a nuanced and actionable framework for crafting effective, interconnected policies and solutions. By addressing each dimension through the lens of the Rhizomatic Digital Ecosystem Framework, policymakers can develop holistic strategies to eliminate the digital divide and foster equitable digital inclusion across all communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1508686"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12052546/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1508686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The digital divide in the United States extends beyond the traditional definition of access, which focuses solely on physical infrastructure like broadband networks and connectivity points. This narrow framing has resulted in policies that fail to address the full spectrum of barriers to digital inclusion. To bridge this gap, we propose the Rhizomatic Digital Ecosystem Framework, which emphasizes five interdependent components: access, availability, adequacy, acceptability and affordability. Access highlights the need for physical infrastructure, with programs like the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Program expanding connectivity to underserved areas. Availability ensures the presence of reliable internet infrastructure to meet community needs, with targeted policies like satellite-based solutions addressing challenges in rural and Indigenous areas. Availability policies should focus on federal funding programs like BEAD and the Tribal Broadband Connectivity Program, incentivizing Internet service Providers (ISP) to expand into underserved areas, and leveraging satellite technologies to address infrastructure gaps. Novel policies to address the digital divide include community-owned broadband networks, dynamic spectrum sharing, and blockchain-powered micro-networks to improve availability in underserved areas. Adequacy examines whether internet services meet modern demands, such as telehealth and online education, emphasizing the need for minimum speed standards and performance improvements. Adequacy policies should include enforcing FCC speed standards with regular audits, requiring ISPs to upgrade outdated infrastructure, and providing government grants to improve broadband quality in communities. For adequacy, solutions like AI-driven broadband performance monitoring, funding edge computing in remote regions, and treating broadband as a public utility can enhance internet speed and quality Acceptability tackles cultural and social barriers, including digital literacy gaps, language differences, and technophobia, which can be addressed through localized literacy programs and inclusive design practices. Acceptability policies should prioritize national digital literacy campaigns for underserved groups, mandate inclusive design and accessibility standards, and offer multilingual and culturally relevant resources for digital tools. Affordability addresses financial barriers, as many low-income households struggle to afford monthly internet fees and devices, even with subsidies such as the Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP). To improve acceptability, innovative approaches like universal digital literacy vouchers, gamified education platforms, and mandatory accessibility standards for all digital technologies can ensure equitable and inclusive digital participation. Together, these five dimensions provide a nuanced and actionable framework for crafting effective, interconnected policies and solutions. By addressing each dimension through the lens of the Rhizomatic Digital Ecosystem Framework, policymakers can develop holistic strategies to eliminate the digital divide and foster equitable digital inclusion across all communities.

重新定义和解决数字鸿沟和排斥,以改善医疗保健:超越可及性,包括可用性、充足性、可接受性和可负担性。
美国的数字鸿沟超出了接入的传统定义,传统定义只关注宽带网络和连接点等物理基础设施。这种狭隘的框架导致政策未能解决数字包容的所有障碍。为了弥补这一差距,我们提出了根茎数字生态系统框架,该框架强调五个相互依存的组成部分:可及性、可用性、充分性、可接受性和可负担性。接入强调了对物理基础设施的需求,宽带公平、接入和部署(BEAD)计划等项目将网络连接扩展到服务不足的地区。可用性确保了可靠的互联网基础设施的存在,以满足社区需求,有针对性的政策,如基于卫星的解决方案,解决农村和土著地区的挑战。可用性政策应侧重于联邦资助项目,如“宽带连接项目”和“部落宽带连接项目”,激励互联网服务提供商(ISP)向服务不足的地区扩张,并利用卫星技术解决基础设施缺口。解决数字鸿沟的新政策包括社区拥有的宽带网络、动态频谱共享和区块链驱动的微网络,以提高服务不足地区的可用性。《充分性》审查互联网服务是否满足远程保健和在线教育等现代需求,强调需要制定最低速度标准和改进性能。充分性政策应包括通过定期审计来执行FCC速度标准,要求互联网服务提供商升级过时的基础设施,并提供政府拨款以提高社区宽带质量。在适当性方面,诸如人工智能驱动的宽带性能监测、资助偏远地区的边缘计算以及将宽带视为公用事业等解决方案可以提高互联网速度和质量,可接受性可以解决文化和社会障碍,包括数字扫盲差距、语言差异和技术恐惧症,这些问题可以通过本地化扫盲计划和包容性设计实践来解决。可接受性政策应优先考虑针对服务不足群体的国家数字扫盲运动,规定包容性设计和可访问性标准,并为数字工具提供多语言和文化相关资源。可负担性解决了经济障碍,因为许多低收入家庭难以负担每月的互联网费用和设备,即使有补贴,如负担得起的连接计划(ACP)。为了提高可接受性,普及数字扫盲券、游戏化教育平台和所有数字技术的强制性无障碍标准等创新方法可以确保公平和包容的数字参与。这五个方面共同为制定有效、相互关联的政策和解决方案提供了一个细致入微、可操作的框架。通过根茎式数字生态系统框架解决每个层面的问题,政策制定者可以制定整体战略,消除数字鸿沟,促进所有社区的公平数字包容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信