Social media and internet use among orthopedic patients in Germany-a multicenter survey.

IF 3.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2025-04-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1486296
Yasmin Youssef, Tu-Lan Vu-Han, Richard Trauth, Georg Osterhoff, David Alexander Back, Tobias Gehlen
{"title":"Social media and internet use among orthopedic patients in Germany-a multicenter survey.","authors":"Yasmin Youssef, Tu-Lan Vu-Han, Richard Trauth, Georg Osterhoff, David Alexander Back, Tobias Gehlen","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1486296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social media (SM) is increasingly used in the healthcare system and offers various benefits for patients such as accessible health information and communication with other patients and healthcare professionals. However, SM also poses risks, including the dissemination of medical misinformation and privacy concerns. This in turn can influence patients' health-related decision-making and the patient-physician relationship. There is limited data regarding which SM orthopedic patients use and what benefits and risks of SM they perceive.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was conducted from April to December 2023 among orthopedic and trauma patients in five German orthopedic clinics. The questionnaire with 32 variables was designed to assess internet and SM usage patterns, platform preferences, and perceived benefits and risks. Statistical analysis was performed, including subgroup analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 267 patients participated, with 82.0% reporting regular SM use. In total 45.9% of the patients used SM for general health questions and 51.3% for orthopedic-related questions. The most used information platforms were conventional websites, YouTube, Instagram, and messenger apps. A total of 45.9% used SM infrequently for general health questions, and 51.3% for orthopedic-related queries. Only 13.7% of patients agreed that SM helped in medical decision-making, and 31.1% felt confident in assessing the credibility of SM content. Additionally, 58.6% of patients were unsure about allowing physicians to present their cases on SM, and 62.3% were uncertain about posting their medical images.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among German orthopedic patients, the use of SM for health-related and gain of orthopedic information was low in the given study. While SM may offer valuable health information, their role in medical decision-making remains limited due to concerns over content credibility and privacy. Video-based content seems to achieve the best reach. Future research should explore these aspects longitudinally and across diverse populations to better understand and address the challenges and benefits of SM in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1486296"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12035442/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1486296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social media (SM) is increasingly used in the healthcare system and offers various benefits for patients such as accessible health information and communication with other patients and healthcare professionals. However, SM also poses risks, including the dissemination of medical misinformation and privacy concerns. This in turn can influence patients' health-related decision-making and the patient-physician relationship. There is limited data regarding which SM orthopedic patients use and what benefits and risks of SM they perceive.

Methods: An online survey was conducted from April to December 2023 among orthopedic and trauma patients in five German orthopedic clinics. The questionnaire with 32 variables was designed to assess internet and SM usage patterns, platform preferences, and perceived benefits and risks. Statistical analysis was performed, including subgroup analyses.

Results: A total of 267 patients participated, with 82.0% reporting regular SM use. In total 45.9% of the patients used SM for general health questions and 51.3% for orthopedic-related questions. The most used information platforms were conventional websites, YouTube, Instagram, and messenger apps. A total of 45.9% used SM infrequently for general health questions, and 51.3% for orthopedic-related queries. Only 13.7% of patients agreed that SM helped in medical decision-making, and 31.1% felt confident in assessing the credibility of SM content. Additionally, 58.6% of patients were unsure about allowing physicians to present their cases on SM, and 62.3% were uncertain about posting their medical images.

Conclusion: Among German orthopedic patients, the use of SM for health-related and gain of orthopedic information was low in the given study. While SM may offer valuable health information, their role in medical decision-making remains limited due to concerns over content credibility and privacy. Video-based content seems to achieve the best reach. Future research should explore these aspects longitudinally and across diverse populations to better understand and address the challenges and benefits of SM in healthcare.

德国骨科患者的社交媒体和互联网使用情况——一项多中心调查。
背景:社交媒体(SM)在医疗保健系统中的应用越来越多,为患者提供了各种好处,例如可获取健康信息以及与其他患者和医疗保健专业人员的沟通。然而,SM也带来风险,包括传播医疗错误信息和隐私问题。这反过来又会影响患者的健康相关决策和医患关系。关于矫形外科患者使用何种SM以及他们认为SM的益处和风险的数据有限。方法:于2023年4月至12月对德国5家骨科诊所的骨科和创伤患者进行在线调查。该问卷包含32个变量,旨在评估互联网和短信的使用模式、平台偏好以及感知的收益和风险。进行统计学分析,包括亚组分析。结果:共有267例患者参与,82.0%的患者报告定期使用SM。45.9%的患者使用SM回答一般健康问题,51.3%的患者使用SM回答骨科相关问题。最常用的信息平台是传统网站、YouTube、Instagram和即时通讯应用。45.9%的人不常使用SM回答一般健康问题,51.3%的人不常使用SM回答骨科相关问题。只有13.7%的患者认为SM有助于医疗决策,31.1%的患者对评估SM内容的可信度有信心。此外,58.6%的患者不确定是否允许医生在SM上展示他们的病例,62.3%的患者不确定是否发布他们的医学图像。结论:在德国骨科患者中,SM在健康相关和骨科信息获取方面的使用率较低。虽然SM可能提供有价值的健康信息,但由于对内容可信度和隐私的担忧,它们在医疗决策中的作用仍然有限。基于视频的内容似乎达到了最好的效果。未来的研究应该在不同的人群中纵向地探索这些方面,以更好地理解和解决SM在医疗保健中的挑战和好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信