Mortality in adolescents after therapeutic intervention for self-harm: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

JCPP advances Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1002/jcv2.12302
Faraz Mughal, Paul Young, Daniel Stahl, Joan R Asarnow, Dennis Ougrin
{"title":"Mortality in adolescents after therapeutic intervention for self-harm: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Faraz Mughal, Paul Young, Daniel Stahl, Joan R Asarnow, Dennis Ougrin","doi":"10.1002/jcv2.12302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-harm in adolescents is an international concern. Evidence highlights that therapeutic intervention (TI), such as cognitive behaviour therapy informed treatments, after self-harm leads to reduced self-harm repetition. However, there is no prior literature about the effects of TI on future mortality in adolescents. We examined the effect of TI on mortality rates in adolescents across RCTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was reported in accordance with PRISMA guidance. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library were searched to 19 June 2024. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts against predefined criteria. RCTs were included if they compared a TI versus a comparator in adolescents up to 18 years with at least one prior self-harm episode. There was no lower age limit. For the pooled effect size of mortality, the DerSimonian-Laird method was used, and a random effects model for self-harm and suicide attempts. The primary outcome was intra or post-trial mortality in adolescent post TI, and the effect of TIs on self-harm including attempted suicide episodes were secondary outcomes. Analyses were done in Stata.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four trials of TIs consisting of 3470 randomised adolescents were included. The pooled risk difference for mortality of participants in the TI group was 0.002 (95% CI -0.003 to 0.008, <i>p</i> = 0.42). There were 6 deaths in the TI group compared to 15 deaths in the comparator group. The pooled risk difference for TI on repeat self-harm was -0.07 (95% CI -0.132 to -0.007, <i>p</i> = 0.028), and -0.05 (95% CI -0.086 to -0.007, <i>p</i> = 0.022) for suicide attempts compared to comparator.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review found no significant impact of TIs on future mortality in adolescents. We also demonstrated that TIs can reduce suicide attempts which can lead to substantial benefits for adolescents, families, and clinical services.</p>","PeriodicalId":73542,"journal":{"name":"JCPP advances","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7617579/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCPP advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.12302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Self-harm in adolescents is an international concern. Evidence highlights that therapeutic intervention (TI), such as cognitive behaviour therapy informed treatments, after self-harm leads to reduced self-harm repetition. However, there is no prior literature about the effects of TI on future mortality in adolescents. We examined the effect of TI on mortality rates in adolescents across RCTs.

Methods: This review was reported in accordance with PRISMA guidance. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library were searched to 19 June 2024. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts against predefined criteria. RCTs were included if they compared a TI versus a comparator in adolescents up to 18 years with at least one prior self-harm episode. There was no lower age limit. For the pooled effect size of mortality, the DerSimonian-Laird method was used, and a random effects model for self-harm and suicide attempts. The primary outcome was intra or post-trial mortality in adolescent post TI, and the effect of TIs on self-harm including attempted suicide episodes were secondary outcomes. Analyses were done in Stata.

Results: Twenty-four trials of TIs consisting of 3470 randomised adolescents were included. The pooled risk difference for mortality of participants in the TI group was 0.002 (95% CI -0.003 to 0.008, p = 0.42). There were 6 deaths in the TI group compared to 15 deaths in the comparator group. The pooled risk difference for TI on repeat self-harm was -0.07 (95% CI -0.132 to -0.007, p = 0.028), and -0.05 (95% CI -0.086 to -0.007, p = 0.022) for suicide attempts compared to comparator.

Conclusions: This review found no significant impact of TIs on future mortality in adolescents. We also demonstrated that TIs can reduce suicide attempts which can lead to substantial benefits for adolescents, families, and clinical services.

青少年自我伤害治疗干预后的死亡率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:青少年自残是一个国际关注的问题。有证据表明,自我伤害后的治疗干预(TI),如认知行为疗法,可以减少自我伤害的重复。然而,目前还没有关于心理治疗对青少年未来死亡率影响的文献。我们通过随机对照试验检验了TI对青少年死亡率的影响。方法:本文按照PRISMA指南进行综述。检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO和Cochrane Library至2024年6月19日。两位作者独立筛选标题,摘要和全文对预定义的标准。如果在18岁以下至少有过一次自残行为的青少年中比较TI与对照者,则纳入随机对照试验。没有年龄下限。死亡率的综合效应量采用dersimonan - laird方法,自残和自杀未遂采用随机效应模型。主要结局是青少年接受心理教育后的试验中或试验后死亡率,次要结局是心理教育对包括自杀未遂事件在内的自我伤害的影响。分析在Stata完成。结果:纳入了24项ti试验,包括3470名随机青少年。TI组参与者死亡率的总风险差异为0.002 (95% CI -0.003 ~ 0.008, p = 0.42)。TI组有6例死亡,而比较组有15例死亡。与比较组相比,TI在重复自我伤害方面的总风险差异为-0.07 (95% CI -0.132至-0.007,p = 0.028),自杀企图方面的总风险差异为-0.05 (95% CI -0.086至-0.007,p = 0.022)。结论:本综述未发现TIs对青少年未来死亡率有显著影响。我们还证明,ti可以减少自杀企图,这可以为青少年、家庭和临床服务带来实质性的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信