Preictal connectivity dynamics: Exploring inflow and outflow in iEEG networks.

Frontiers in network physiology Pub Date : 2025-04-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnetp.2025.1539682
Amirhossein Jahani, Camille Begin, Denahin H Toffa, Sami Obaid, Dang K Nguyen, Elie Bou Assi
{"title":"Preictal connectivity dynamics: Exploring inflow and outflow in iEEG networks.","authors":"Amirhossein Jahani, Camille Begin, Denahin H Toffa, Sami Obaid, Dang K Nguyen, Elie Bou Assi","doi":"10.3389/fnetp.2025.1539682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Focal resective surgery can be an effective treatment option for patients with refractory epilepsy if the seizure onset zone is accurately identied through intracranial EEG recordings. The traditional concept of the epileptogenic zone has expanded to the notion of an epileptogenic network, emphasizing the role of interconnected brain regions in seizure generation. Precise delineation of this network is essential for optimizing surgical outcomes. Over the past 3 decades, several quantitative connectivity methods have been developed to study the interactions between the seizure onset zone and non-involved regions. Despite these advances, the mechanisms governing the transition from interictal to ictal periods remain poorly understood. In this study, we investigated preictal interactions between the seizure onset zone and the broader network using directed connectivity measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated their effectiveness in identifying seizure onset zones using a multicenter intracranial EEG dataset, encompassing 243 seizures from 61 patients. Directed transfer function and partial directed coherence were used to extract connectivity matrices during 28-seconds of preictal period in patients with good surgery outcomes. Inflow and outflow metrics were computed for iEEG electrode contact annotated as seizure onset zone and the performance of each metric is assessed in disentangling these electrodes from the rest of the network.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed two distinct patterns of network connectivity preceding seizure onset. While there was an increase in inflow of information to seizure onset electrodes in one subset of patients, in the other subset, there was a prominent outflow of information from seizure onset electrodes to the rest of the network, suggesting distinct connectivity patterns associated with the seizure onset zone across patients. Further analyses showed that patients who underwent the grid/strip/depth implantation approach exhibited significantly higher area under curve (AUC) than those with electrocorticography (ECoG) or stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG) alone. Finally, examining the influence of lesional vs non-lesional neuroimaging status demonstrated that a greater proportion of high-inflow and high-outflow were lesional.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings reinforce the notion that seizure generation is driven by dynamic shifts in information flow within the brain's functional network. The preictal connectivity patterns observed --either increased inflow to the seizure onset zone or high outflow from it --underscore the network reorganization involved in epileptic transitions. These results emphasize epilepsy as a network-level phenomenon, supporting the use of network concepts for better understanding seizure dynamics and improving surgical localization strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73092,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in network physiology","volume":"5 ","pages":"1539682"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in network physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnetp.2025.1539682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Focal resective surgery can be an effective treatment option for patients with refractory epilepsy if the seizure onset zone is accurately identied through intracranial EEG recordings. The traditional concept of the epileptogenic zone has expanded to the notion of an epileptogenic network, emphasizing the role of interconnected brain regions in seizure generation. Precise delineation of this network is essential for optimizing surgical outcomes. Over the past 3 decades, several quantitative connectivity methods have been developed to study the interactions between the seizure onset zone and non-involved regions. Despite these advances, the mechanisms governing the transition from interictal to ictal periods remain poorly understood. In this study, we investigated preictal interactions between the seizure onset zone and the broader network using directed connectivity measures.

Methods: We evaluated their effectiveness in identifying seizure onset zones using a multicenter intracranial EEG dataset, encompassing 243 seizures from 61 patients. Directed transfer function and partial directed coherence were used to extract connectivity matrices during 28-seconds of preictal period in patients with good surgery outcomes. Inflow and outflow metrics were computed for iEEG electrode contact annotated as seizure onset zone and the performance of each metric is assessed in disentangling these electrodes from the rest of the network.

Results: We observed two distinct patterns of network connectivity preceding seizure onset. While there was an increase in inflow of information to seizure onset electrodes in one subset of patients, in the other subset, there was a prominent outflow of information from seizure onset electrodes to the rest of the network, suggesting distinct connectivity patterns associated with the seizure onset zone across patients. Further analyses showed that patients who underwent the grid/strip/depth implantation approach exhibited significantly higher area under curve (AUC) than those with electrocorticography (ECoG) or stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG) alone. Finally, examining the influence of lesional vs non-lesional neuroimaging status demonstrated that a greater proportion of high-inflow and high-outflow were lesional.

Conclusion: Our findings reinforce the notion that seizure generation is driven by dynamic shifts in information flow within the brain's functional network. The preictal connectivity patterns observed --either increased inflow to the seizure onset zone or high outflow from it --underscore the network reorganization involved in epileptic transitions. These results emphasize epilepsy as a network-level phenomenon, supporting the use of network concepts for better understanding seizure dynamics and improving surgical localization strategies.

预测连通性动态:探索iEEG网络的流入和流出。
导读:如果通过颅内脑电图记录准确识别癫痫发作区域,局灶性切除手术可以成为难治性癫痫患者的有效治疗选择。传统的癫痫区概念已经扩展到癫痫网络的概念,强调相互连接的大脑区域在癫痫发作产生中的作用。精确描述该网络对于优化手术结果至关重要。在过去的30年里,已经发展了几种定量连接方法来研究癫痫发作区和非相关区域之间的相互作用。尽管取得了这些进展,但控制从间歇期到危险期过渡的机制仍然知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们使用定向连接测量方法调查了癫痫发作区和更广泛网络之间的预测相互作用。方法:我们使用多中心颅内脑电图数据集(包括61例患者的243次癫痫发作)评估了它们在识别癫痫发作区域方面的有效性。应用定向传递函数和部分定向相干提取手术效果良好的患者术前28秒的连通性矩阵。计算了脑电图电极接触的流入和流出指标,并将其标记为癫痫发作区,并通过将这些电极与网络的其余部分分开来评估每个指标的性能。结果:我们观察到癫痫发作前两种截然不同的网络连接模式。在一组患者中,信息流入癫痫发作电极的数量增加,而在另一组患者中,信息从癫痫发作电极流出到网络的其余部分的数量明显增加,这表明不同患者的癫痫发作区有不同的连接模式。进一步分析表明,采用网格/条形/深度植入方法的患者曲线下面积(AUC)明显高于单独采用皮质电图(ECoG)或立体脑电图(sEEG)的患者。最后,检查病变与非病变神经影像学状态的影响表明,高流入和高流出的比例更大。结论:我们的研究结果强化了癫痫发作是由大脑功能网络中信息流的动态变化所驱动的这一观点。观察到的前脑连通性模式——要么流入癫痫发作区增加,要么从癫痫发作区大量流出——强调了癫痫过渡中涉及的神经网络重组。这些结果强调癫痫是一种网络层面的现象,支持使用网络概念来更好地理解癫痫发作动态和改进手术定位策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信