Real-time biofluorescent particle counting compared to conventional air sampling for monitoring airborne contamination in orthopedic implant surgery.

Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE Pub Date : 2025-04-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/ash.2025.61
Frans Stålfelt, Josefin Seth Caous, Karin Svensson Malchau, Camilla Björn, Maziar Mohaddes
{"title":"Real-time biofluorescent particle counting compared to conventional air sampling for monitoring airborne contamination in orthopedic implant surgery.","authors":"Frans Stålfelt, Josefin Seth Caous, Karin Svensson Malchau, Camilla Björn, Maziar Mohaddes","doi":"10.1017/ash.2025.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical site infection (SSI) following orthopedic surgery is a complication associated with morbidity and economic burden. Transmission of airborne bacteria that settle into surgical wounds constitutes a risk factor for SSIs. However, monitoring microbial contamination inside operating rooms with conventional methods is resource and time-consuming.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess correlation between a biofluorescent particle counter (BFPC) and conventional air sampling, to enable real-time monitoring of airborne contamination. Additionally, the study aimed to analyze correlation between particles near the surgical site and particles 1 meter away, to evaluate the feasibility of distance-based measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Correlation analysis was conducted to compare colony-forming units (CFU) collected using a Sartorius MD8 air sampler with biofluorescent viable particles detected by BioTrak 9510-BD, both positioned near the surgical site. Additionally, correlation between particle counts measured by AeroTrak 6510, positioned 1 meter away, and total particle counts measured by the BioTrak near the surgical site was evaluated. Sampling took place in two operating rooms: one with turbulent mixed airflow (TMA) and one with unidirectional airflow (UDAF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Negligible to low correlation between biofluorescent particles and CFU was observed, both in UDAF (n = 100) and TMA (n = 22). However, strong correlation was found between BFPC and particle counter measurements of total numbers of particles (R<sub>p</sub> = 0.634-0.769, <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While BFPCs offer real-time monitoring of airborne contamination, their predictive ability for CFU levels remains uncertain. Yet, the strong correlation between particles in the surgical site and particles measured 1 meter away suggests feasibility to conduct future studies with larger cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"5 1","pages":"e93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11986878/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) following orthopedic surgery is a complication associated with morbidity and economic burden. Transmission of airborne bacteria that settle into surgical wounds constitutes a risk factor for SSIs. However, monitoring microbial contamination inside operating rooms with conventional methods is resource and time-consuming.

Aim: This study aimed to assess correlation between a biofluorescent particle counter (BFPC) and conventional air sampling, to enable real-time monitoring of airborne contamination. Additionally, the study aimed to analyze correlation between particles near the surgical site and particles 1 meter away, to evaluate the feasibility of distance-based measurements.

Methods: Correlation analysis was conducted to compare colony-forming units (CFU) collected using a Sartorius MD8 air sampler with biofluorescent viable particles detected by BioTrak 9510-BD, both positioned near the surgical site. Additionally, correlation between particle counts measured by AeroTrak 6510, positioned 1 meter away, and total particle counts measured by the BioTrak near the surgical site was evaluated. Sampling took place in two operating rooms: one with turbulent mixed airflow (TMA) and one with unidirectional airflow (UDAF).

Results: Negligible to low correlation between biofluorescent particles and CFU was observed, both in UDAF (n = 100) and TMA (n = 22). However, strong correlation was found between BFPC and particle counter measurements of total numbers of particles (Rp = 0.634-0.769, P < .001).

Conclusion: While BFPCs offer real-time monitoring of airborne contamination, their predictive ability for CFU levels remains uncertain. Yet, the strong correlation between particles in the surgical site and particles measured 1 meter away suggests feasibility to conduct future studies with larger cohorts.

实时生物荧光粒子计数与传统空气采样监测骨科植入手术中空气污染的比较。
背景:骨科手术后手术部位感染(SSI)是一种与发病率和经济负担相关的并发症。通过空气传播的细菌进入手术伤口是发生ssi的一个危险因素。然而,用常规方法监测手术室内微生物污染既费时又费力。目的:本研究旨在评估生物荧光粒子计数器(BFPC)与传统空气采样的相关性,以实现空气污染的实时监测。此外,该研究旨在分析手术部位附近颗粒与1米外颗粒之间的相关性,以评估基于距离测量的可行性。方法:将Sartorius MD8空气采样器采集的菌落形成单位(CFU)与BioTrak 9510-BD检测的生物荧光活菌颗粒进行相关性分析,两者均位于手术部位附近。此外,还评估了位于1米外的AeroTrak 6510测量的颗粒计数与靠近手术部位的BioTrak测量的总颗粒计数之间的相关性。采样在两个手术室进行:一个是湍流混合气流(TMA),一个是单向气流(UDAF)。结果:在UDAF (n = 100)和TMA (n = 22)中,生物荧光颗粒与CFU的相关性可忽略或低。然而,BFPC与粒子计数器测量的粒子总数之间存在很强的相关性(Rp = 0.634-0.769, P < 0.001)。结论:虽然bfpc可以实时监测空气污染,但其对CFU水平的预测能力仍不确定。然而,手术部位的颗粒与1米外测量的颗粒之间的强相关性表明,在更大的队列中进行未来研究是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信