Comparative analysis of pericervical dentin reduction using three rotary file systems: A micro-computed tomography study.

Anuradha Patil, Rutuja Rajput, V Sumanthini Margasahayam, Divya Naik, Jimish Shah, Manasi Surwade
{"title":"Comparative analysis of pericervical dentin reduction using three rotary file systems: A micro-computed tomography study.","authors":"Anuradha Patil, Rutuja Rajput, V Sumanthini Margasahayam, Divya Naik, Jimish Shah, Manasi Surwade","doi":"10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_107_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maintaining pericervical dentin (PCD) thickness is crucial for the long-term prognosis of endodontically treated teeth. Root fractures are closely linked to PCD loss, which is influenced by the type of rotary file system used.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study compared the effect of three rotary file systems - TruNatomy, OneShape, and ProTaper Gold - on PCD thickness in the mesiobuccal root of mandibular molars using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-seven mandibular first molars were mounted on wax and scanned using micro-CT before and after instrumentation. Samples were randomly divided into three groups (<i>n</i> = 9) and instrumented per manufacturer guidelines. PCD thickness was measured at 2 mm and 4 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) on mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual surfaces. Data were analyzed using a paired t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and Tukey's post hoc test (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was observed at 4 mm below the CEJ. However, TruNatomy showed significantly less dentin removal at 2 mm (<i>P</i> = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TruNatomy preserved the most dentin, followed by ProTaper Gold and OneShape. Selecting appropriate rotary instruments can help minimize dentin loss and enhance the longevity of endodontically treated teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":516842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","volume":"28 4","pages":"377-383"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12037117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_107_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Maintaining pericervical dentin (PCD) thickness is crucial for the long-term prognosis of endodontically treated teeth. Root fractures are closely linked to PCD loss, which is influenced by the type of rotary file system used.

Aims: This study compared the effect of three rotary file systems - TruNatomy, OneShape, and ProTaper Gold - on PCD thickness in the mesiobuccal root of mandibular molars using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).

Materials and methods: Twenty-seven mandibular first molars were mounted on wax and scanned using micro-CT before and after instrumentation. Samples were randomly divided into three groups (n = 9) and instrumented per manufacturer guidelines. PCD thickness was measured at 2 mm and 4 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) on mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual surfaces. Data were analyzed using a paired t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and Tukey's post hoc test (P < 0.05).

Results: No significant difference was observed at 4 mm below the CEJ. However, TruNatomy showed significantly less dentin removal at 2 mm (P = 0.003).

Conclusions: TruNatomy preserved the most dentin, followed by ProTaper Gold and OneShape. Selecting appropriate rotary instruments can help minimize dentin loss and enhance the longevity of endodontically treated teeth.

使用三种旋转文件系统对颈周牙本质复位的比较分析:一项微型计算机断层扫描研究。
背景:维持颈周牙本质(PCD)厚度对根管治疗后牙齿的长期预后至关重要。根断裂与PCD损失密切相关,PCD损失受所使用的旋转文件系统类型的影响。目的:本研究利用微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)比较了三种旋转锉系统(TruNatomy, OneShape和ProTaper Gold)对下颌磨牙中颊根PCD厚度的影响。材料与方法:27下颌第一磨牙是安装在蜡和之前和之后使用ct机扫描仪器。样本随机分为三组(n = 9),并根据制造商指南进行仪器检测。在近中、远中、颊和舌面牙髓-牙釉质交界处(CEJ)下2 mm和4 mm处测量PCD厚度。数据分析采用配对t检验、单因素方差分析和Tukey事后检验(P < 0.05)。结果:CEJ以下4mm处无显著性差异。然而,鼻切开术在2 mm处牙本质去除明显减少(P = 0.003)。结论:鼻切开术保留牙本质最多,ProTaper Gold次之,OneShape次之。选择合适的旋转器械可以减少牙本质的损失,延长牙髓治疗后的牙齿寿命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信