{"title":"Comparative analysis of pericervical dentin reduction using three rotary file systems: A micro-computed tomography study.","authors":"Anuradha Patil, Rutuja Rajput, V Sumanthini Margasahayam, Divya Naik, Jimish Shah, Manasi Surwade","doi":"10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_107_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maintaining pericervical dentin (PCD) thickness is crucial for the long-term prognosis of endodontically treated teeth. Root fractures are closely linked to PCD loss, which is influenced by the type of rotary file system used.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study compared the effect of three rotary file systems - TruNatomy, OneShape, and ProTaper Gold - on PCD thickness in the mesiobuccal root of mandibular molars using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-seven mandibular first molars were mounted on wax and scanned using micro-CT before and after instrumentation. Samples were randomly divided into three groups (<i>n</i> = 9) and instrumented per manufacturer guidelines. PCD thickness was measured at 2 mm and 4 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) on mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual surfaces. Data were analyzed using a paired t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and Tukey's post hoc test (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was observed at 4 mm below the CEJ. However, TruNatomy showed significantly less dentin removal at 2 mm (<i>P</i> = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TruNatomy preserved the most dentin, followed by ProTaper Gold and OneShape. Selecting appropriate rotary instruments can help minimize dentin loss and enhance the longevity of endodontically treated teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":516842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","volume":"28 4","pages":"377-383"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12037117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_107_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Maintaining pericervical dentin (PCD) thickness is crucial for the long-term prognosis of endodontically treated teeth. Root fractures are closely linked to PCD loss, which is influenced by the type of rotary file system used.
Aims: This study compared the effect of three rotary file systems - TruNatomy, OneShape, and ProTaper Gold - on PCD thickness in the mesiobuccal root of mandibular molars using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).
Materials and methods: Twenty-seven mandibular first molars were mounted on wax and scanned using micro-CT before and after instrumentation. Samples were randomly divided into three groups (n = 9) and instrumented per manufacturer guidelines. PCD thickness was measured at 2 mm and 4 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) on mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual surfaces. Data were analyzed using a paired t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and Tukey's post hoc test (P < 0.05).
Results: No significant difference was observed at 4 mm below the CEJ. However, TruNatomy showed significantly less dentin removal at 2 mm (P = 0.003).
Conclusions: TruNatomy preserved the most dentin, followed by ProTaper Gold and OneShape. Selecting appropriate rotary instruments can help minimize dentin loss and enhance the longevity of endodontically treated teeth.