The Prevalence of Contact Allergies for Wound Dressings in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers (PAID Study), an Observational Prospective Trial.

Birgitte M Visch, Daphne van der Veen, Luuk Smeets, Roland Toeter, Arianne van Bon, Diana Romijn
{"title":"The Prevalence of Contact Allergies for Wound Dressings in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers (PAID Study), an Observational Prospective Trial.","authors":"Birgitte M Visch, Daphne van der Veen, Luuk Smeets, Roland Toeter, Arianne van Bon, Diana Romijn","doi":"10.1177/15347346251332028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This investigator initiated prospective observational study investigates the prevalence of contact allergies in patients with a Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU). Patients with a DFU received a combined PATCH-test (a test used to investigate the origin of an allergic reaction on the skin) at the upper back, with the European baseline series, the European leg ulcer series, and local used material for leg ulcers. A total of 108 patients with DFU were included of which 86 (79.6%) were male, and 9 (8.3%) and 99 (91.7%) patients had Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, respectively. Twenty-one patients had a sensitization in the standard series, 30 patients in the leg ulcer series, and 11 patients in both series. Two patients had a positive reaction for one of the local used materials. Most frequent sensitizations were found for Perubalsem (N = 6) and Fragrance-Mix II (N = 4) in the standard series. A sensitization for Povidone-Iodine (N = 20) was most frequently seen in the leg ulcer series. In the local used materials a sensitization for silver sulfadiazine (N = 1) and cutimed-gel (n = 1) were seen. In conclusion, this study provides novel information about sensitizations in patients with DFU, but more research is needed to demonstrate the relationship between allergic reactions and delayed wound healing. The study protocol was registered in www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04085705, PAID study).</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":" ","pages":"15347346251332028"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346251332028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This investigator initiated prospective observational study investigates the prevalence of contact allergies in patients with a Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU). Patients with a DFU received a combined PATCH-test (a test used to investigate the origin of an allergic reaction on the skin) at the upper back, with the European baseline series, the European leg ulcer series, and local used material for leg ulcers. A total of 108 patients with DFU were included of which 86 (79.6%) were male, and 9 (8.3%) and 99 (91.7%) patients had Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, respectively. Twenty-one patients had a sensitization in the standard series, 30 patients in the leg ulcer series, and 11 patients in both series. Two patients had a positive reaction for one of the local used materials. Most frequent sensitizations were found for Perubalsem (N = 6) and Fragrance-Mix II (N = 4) in the standard series. A sensitization for Povidone-Iodine (N = 20) was most frequently seen in the leg ulcer series. In the local used materials a sensitization for silver sulfadiazine (N = 1) and cutimed-gel (n = 1) were seen. In conclusion, this study provides novel information about sensitizations in patients with DFU, but more research is needed to demonstrate the relationship between allergic reactions and delayed wound healing. The study protocol was registered in www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04085705, PAID study).

糖尿病足溃疡患者伤口敷料接触性过敏的患病率(PAID研究),一项观察性前瞻性试验。
本研究对糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)患者接触性过敏的发生率进行了前瞻性观察性研究。DFU患者在上背部接受了联合贴片试验(一种用于调查皮肤过敏反应来源的试验),其中包括欧洲基线系列、欧洲腿部溃疡系列和当地使用的腿部溃疡材料。共纳入108例DFU患者,其中男性86例(79.6%),1型糖尿病9例(8.3%),2型糖尿病99例(91.7%)。标准组21例患者有致敏,30例患者有腿溃疡组,11例患者有两组。两名患者对其中一种当地使用过的材料有阳性反应。在标准系列中,Perubalsem (N = 6)和Fragrance-Mix II (N = 4)是最常见的致敏剂。聚维酮碘致敏(N = 20)在腿部溃疡系列中最常见。在局部使用的材料中,观察到对磺胺嘧啶银(N = 1)和角质凝胶(N = 1)的增敏作用。总之,本研究为DFU患者的致敏性提供了新的信息,但需要更多的研究来证明过敏反应与伤口延迟愈合之间的关系。研究方案已在www.clinicaltrials.gov注册(NCT04085705, PAID研究)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信