Association of premarital pregnancy with adverse birth outcomes and its characteristics in Japan.

IF 1.9 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Tasuku Okui, Naoki Nakashima
{"title":"Association of premarital pregnancy with adverse birth outcomes and its characteristics in Japan.","authors":"Tasuku Okui, Naoki Nakashima","doi":"10.1186/s40834-025-00357-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A study investigating the association between premarital pregnancy and the adverse birth outcomes has not been conducted in Japan. This study aimed to investigate an association of premarital pregnancy with adverse birth outcomes and its characteristics in Japan, using national birth data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Birth data from the Vital Statistics: Occupational and Industrial Aspects for the fiscal years 2010, 2015, and 2020 were used. Firstborn and singleton births were used, and we restricted the data to infants born to Japanese parents. We defined the status of premarital pregnancy based on the length of marriage at the time of birth. Rates of preterm birth, term low birth weight (TLBW), and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) were used as outcomes. Log-binomial regression analysis was conducted to calculate the adjusted risk ratio of premarital pregnancy for each of the outcomes. Furthermore, logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with premarital pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 888,459 births were included in the analysis. The results of log-binomial regression showed that the risk of premarital pregnancy was statistically significantly higher than that of postmarital pregnancy for all the outcomes, and the risk ratios were 1.65 (95% confidence intervals (CI):1.58, 1.72), 1.17 (95% CI:1.12, 1.22), and 1.12 (95% CI:1.08, 1.17) for preterm birth, TLBW, and SGA, respectively. The results of logistic regression analysis showed that lower non-manual workers, manual workers, and others were significantly and positively associated with premarital pregnancy compared to upper non-manual workers in terms of maternal and paternal occupations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It was shown that premarital pregnancy was associated with a higher risk of preterm birth, TLBW, and SGA and was positively associated with parental occupations such as lower non-manual workers and manual workers in Japan.</p>","PeriodicalId":93956,"journal":{"name":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11980210/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-025-00357-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A study investigating the association between premarital pregnancy and the adverse birth outcomes has not been conducted in Japan. This study aimed to investigate an association of premarital pregnancy with adverse birth outcomes and its characteristics in Japan, using national birth data.

Methods: Birth data from the Vital Statistics: Occupational and Industrial Aspects for the fiscal years 2010, 2015, and 2020 were used. Firstborn and singleton births were used, and we restricted the data to infants born to Japanese parents. We defined the status of premarital pregnancy based on the length of marriage at the time of birth. Rates of preterm birth, term low birth weight (TLBW), and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) were used as outcomes. Log-binomial regression analysis was conducted to calculate the adjusted risk ratio of premarital pregnancy for each of the outcomes. Furthermore, logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with premarital pregnancy.

Results: Data from 888,459 births were included in the analysis. The results of log-binomial regression showed that the risk of premarital pregnancy was statistically significantly higher than that of postmarital pregnancy for all the outcomes, and the risk ratios were 1.65 (95% confidence intervals (CI):1.58, 1.72), 1.17 (95% CI:1.12, 1.22), and 1.12 (95% CI:1.08, 1.17) for preterm birth, TLBW, and SGA, respectively. The results of logistic regression analysis showed that lower non-manual workers, manual workers, and others were significantly and positively associated with premarital pregnancy compared to upper non-manual workers in terms of maternal and paternal occupations.

Conclusions: It was shown that premarital pregnancy was associated with a higher risk of preterm birth, TLBW, and SGA and was positively associated with parental occupations such as lower non-manual workers and manual workers in Japan.

Abstract Image

日本婚前妊娠与不良分娩结局的关系及其特点。
背景:一项调查婚前怀孕与不良分娩结局之间关系的研究尚未在日本进行。本研究旨在调查日本婚前怀孕与不良分娩结局的关系及其特征,使用国家出生数据。方法:采用2010、2015、2020财政年度《生命统计:职业与工业方面》中的出生数据。我们使用了第一胎和独生子女,我们将数据限制在日本父母所生的婴儿身上。我们根据出生时的婚姻时间长短来定义婚前怀孕的状况。以早产率、足月低出生体重(TLBW)和小胎龄(SGA)作为结局。采用对数二项回归分析计算各结局的婚前怀孕调整风险比。此外,进行logistic回归分析,以确定与婚前怀孕相关的因素。结果:888,459例新生儿的数据被纳入分析。对数二项回归结果显示,所有结局中,婚前妊娠的风险均显著高于婚后妊娠,早产、TLBW、SGA的风险比分别为1.65(95%可信区间(CI):1.58、1.72)、1.17 (95% CI:1.12、1.22)、1.12 (95% CI:1.08、1.17)。logistic回归分析结果显示,在父亲和母亲职业方面,较低的非体力劳动者、体力劳动者和其他与婚前怀孕有显著的正相关关系。结论:在日本,婚前怀孕与较高的早产、TLBW和SGA风险相关,并与父母的职业(如较低的非体力劳动者和体力劳动者)呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信