Evaluating the antimicrobial effectiveness of endodontic sealers against oral pathogens associated with failed root canal treatments.

Ajay Chhabra, K P Ramya, B Saravana Prathap, Mallika Sengupta, Aditya Kundu, Priyanka Yadav, Sona J Parvathy
{"title":"Evaluating the antimicrobial effectiveness of endodontic sealers against oral pathogens associated with failed root canal treatments.","authors":"Ajay Chhabra, K P Ramya, B Saravana Prathap, Mallika Sengupta, Aditya Kundu, Priyanka Yadav, Sona J Parvathy","doi":"10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_841_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Overview: </strong>Residual pathogens lead to treatment failure. Microbes like <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>, <i>Candida albicans</i>, and <i>Actinomyces israelii</i> are often isolated after failed root canal therapy. Therefore, the antimicrobial efficacy of sealers is critical for treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of endodontic sealers against <i>E. faecalis</i> and <i>C. albicans</i>.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The agar diffusion test was used to evaluate the antibacterial efficacy of four sealers: MTA Fillapex, Bio-C-Sealer, Sealapex, and Seal-Pex. Each microorganism's bacterial suspension was added to agar plates separately. The sterile discs were then placed on the plates; later, a freshly mixed sealer was coated on the sterile discs. After 24 h of incubation, inhibition zones were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analyze the data, and the Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-test was used for <i>post hoc</i> pairwise comparison. The results demonstrated that Seal-Pex has potent antibacterial activity against E. faecalis (P < 0.05). Against C. albicans, both MTA Fillapex and Seal-Pex were effective, with MTA Fillapex showing a statistically significant difference compared to Bio-C Sealer and Sealapex.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Seal-Pex, an epoxy resin-based sealer, exhibited a significant antimicrobial efficacy against <i>E. faecalis</i>. Conversely, MTA Fillapex demonstrated notable antifungal activity against <i>C. albicans</i>, surpassing other tested sealers. These findings highlight the differential antimicrobial and antifungal properties of the sealers.</p>","PeriodicalId":516842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","volume":"28 3","pages":"264-268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12007748/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_841_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Overview: Residual pathogens lead to treatment failure. Microbes like Enterococcus faecalis, Candida albicans, and Actinomyces israelii are often isolated after failed root canal therapy. Therefore, the antimicrobial efficacy of sealers is critical for treatment outcomes.

Aim: To evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of endodontic sealers against E. faecalis and C. albicans.

Methodology: The agar diffusion test was used to evaluate the antibacterial efficacy of four sealers: MTA Fillapex, Bio-C-Sealer, Sealapex, and Seal-Pex. Each microorganism's bacterial suspension was added to agar plates separately. The sterile discs were then placed on the plates; later, a freshly mixed sealer was coated on the sterile discs. After 24 h of incubation, inhibition zones were measured.

Results: The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analyze the data, and the Mann-Whitney U-test was used for post hoc pairwise comparison. The results demonstrated that Seal-Pex has potent antibacterial activity against E. faecalis (P < 0.05). Against C. albicans, both MTA Fillapex and Seal-Pex were effective, with MTA Fillapex showing a statistically significant difference compared to Bio-C Sealer and Sealapex.

Conclusion: Seal-Pex, an epoxy resin-based sealer, exhibited a significant antimicrobial efficacy against E. faecalis. Conversely, MTA Fillapex demonstrated notable antifungal activity against C. albicans, surpassing other tested sealers. These findings highlight the differential antimicrobial and antifungal properties of the sealers.

评估根管密封剂对与根管治疗失败相关的口腔病原体的抗菌效果。
概述:残留的病原体导致治疗失败。粪肠球菌、白色念珠菌和以色列放线菌等微生物经常在根管治疗失败后被分离出来。因此,封口剂的抗菌效果对治疗结果至关重要。目的:评价牙髓密封剂对粪肠杆菌和白色念珠菌的抗菌效果。方法:采用琼脂扩散法评价MTA Fillapex、Bio-C-Sealer、Sealapex和Seal-Pex四种封口剂的抗菌效果。将每种微生物的菌悬液分别加入琼脂皿中。然后将无菌圆盘放在平板上;然后,在无菌光盘上涂上新鲜混合的封口剂。孵育24 h后测定抑菌带。结果:数据分析采用Kruskal-Wallis检验,事后两两比较采用Mann-Whitney u检验。结果表明,Seal-Pex对粪肠杆菌具有较强的抑菌活性(P < 0.05)。MTA Fillapex和Seal-Pex对白色念珠菌均有效,其中MTA Fillapex与Bio-C Sealer和Sealapex相比差异有统计学意义。结论:Seal-Pex环氧树脂基封口剂对粪肠杆菌具有明显的抗菌作用。相反,MTA Fillapex对白色念珠菌表现出显著的抗真菌活性,优于其他测试的封口剂。这些发现突出了不同封口剂的抗菌和抗真菌性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信