Sepsis research in Canada: An environmental scan of sepsis investigators, research, and funding.

PLOS global public health Pub Date : 2025-04-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0003606
Muhadisa Ali, Saad Y Salim, Fatima Sheikh, Alison E Fox-Robichaud
{"title":"Sepsis research in Canada: An environmental scan of sepsis investigators, research, and funding.","authors":"Muhadisa Ali, Saad Y Salim, Fatima Sheikh, Alison E Fox-Robichaud","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0003606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sepsis is the world's second leading cause of mortality. In 2017, the World Health Assembly declared sepsis a global priority and adopted a resolution prompting member states to improve the prevention, recognition, and management of sepsis. This cross-sectional study examines the sepsis research landscape in Canada, including demographics, scope, and funding. Using convenient sampling, sepsis researchers in Canada were asked to complete an online 20-question survey. We also scanned the CIHR funding database from 2012-2022 to quantify national research dollars spent on sepsis-related projects. Quantitative data was summarized using descriptive statistics, and textual descriptions of current sepsis research activities were analyzed thematically. With a response rate of 46% (69 of the 150), respondents were primarily men (n = 46/69, 67%), who identified as White/European (n = 49/69, 71%), and were professors or clinical professors (n = 36/69, 52%). The predominant areas of research focus were identification of sepsis (n = 21/55, 38%) and treatment/management (29/55, 53%) of sepsis, while sepsis prevention (n = 4/55, 7%) and sepsis education (n = 5/55, 9%) garnered less attention. Past 10 years of CIHR funding data revealed that only 0.7% ($85 million) of total funding ($11 billion) was towards sepsis research, of which only 2 were new-investigator awards. This study illustrates the need for improving the diversity of sepsis researchers in Canada; expanding the scope of research to address sepsis prevention, recovery, and education; and increasing overall funding to sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"5 4","pages":"e0003606"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12040209/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sepsis is the world's second leading cause of mortality. In 2017, the World Health Assembly declared sepsis a global priority and adopted a resolution prompting member states to improve the prevention, recognition, and management of sepsis. This cross-sectional study examines the sepsis research landscape in Canada, including demographics, scope, and funding. Using convenient sampling, sepsis researchers in Canada were asked to complete an online 20-question survey. We also scanned the CIHR funding database from 2012-2022 to quantify national research dollars spent on sepsis-related projects. Quantitative data was summarized using descriptive statistics, and textual descriptions of current sepsis research activities were analyzed thematically. With a response rate of 46% (69 of the 150), respondents were primarily men (n = 46/69, 67%), who identified as White/European (n = 49/69, 71%), and were professors or clinical professors (n = 36/69, 52%). The predominant areas of research focus were identification of sepsis (n = 21/55, 38%) and treatment/management (29/55, 53%) of sepsis, while sepsis prevention (n = 4/55, 7%) and sepsis education (n = 5/55, 9%) garnered less attention. Past 10 years of CIHR funding data revealed that only 0.7% ($85 million) of total funding ($11 billion) was towards sepsis research, of which only 2 were new-investigator awards. This study illustrates the need for improving the diversity of sepsis researchers in Canada; expanding the scope of research to address sepsis prevention, recovery, and education; and increasing overall funding to sepsis.

加拿大败血症研究:败血症研究人员、研究和资金的环境扫描。
败血症是世界上第二大死亡原因。2017年,世界卫生大会宣布败血症为全球优先事项,并通过了一项决议,促使会员国改进败血症的预防、识别和管理。这项横断面研究考察了加拿大败血症研究的情况,包括人口统计、范围和资金。通过方便的抽样,加拿大的败血症研究人员被要求完成一项包含20个问题的在线调查。我们还扫描了2012-2022年CIHR资助数据库,量化了败血症相关项目的国家研究资金。定量数据采用描述性统计进行汇总,并对当前脓毒症研究活动的文本描述进行主题分析。响应率为46%(150人中有69人),受访者主要是男性(n = 46/ 66,67%),他们被认定为白人/欧洲人(n = 49/ 66,71%),并且是教授或临床教授(n = 36/ 66,52%)。研究重点主要集中在脓毒症的识别(n = 21/ 55,38 %)和脓毒症的治疗/管理(n = 29/ 55,53 %),而脓毒症预防(n = 4/ 55,7 %)和脓毒症教育(n = 5/ 55,9 %)较少受到关注。CIHR过去10年的资助数据显示,总资助(110亿美元)中只有0.7%(8500万美元)用于败血症研究,其中只有2个是新研究者奖励。这项研究说明需要改善加拿大败血症研究人员的多样性;扩大败血症预防、康复和教育的研究范围;并增加对败血症的总体资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信