Brittany N Krekeler, Anna Hopkins, Melissa Cooke, Meredith Tabangin, Mekibib Altaye, Shaun Wahab, Bonnie Martin-Harris
{"title":"Poststroke Lingual Function and Swallowing Physiology.","authors":"Brittany N Krekeler, Anna Hopkins, Melissa Cooke, Meredith Tabangin, Mekibib Altaye, Shaun Wahab, Bonnie Martin-Harris","doi":"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Poststroke dysphagia is characterized by deficits in lingual function. However, correlations between lingual function and oral and pharyngeal swallowing impairments have not been well defined. The aim of this preliminary study was to explore if tongue pressure generative capacity in patients after ischemic stroke is associated with oropharyngeal swallowing impairments.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional convenience sample of ischemic stroke patients underwent a videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) and completed measures of lingual function (Saliva Swallow Pressure, maximum isometric pressure [MIP], Maximum Isometric Endurance [ISO-M], and Maximum Isotonic Endurance [ISO-T]) using the Tongueometer and Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) lingual manometry instruments. VFSS for each participant were consensus scored by two Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP)-certified raters. MBSImP Oral Total and Pharyngeal Total scores were calculated, and Swallow-by-Swallow MBSImP scores were summarized by calculating a percentage of the worst possible score across all bolus presentations for that score. Lingual measurements (swallow pressures, MIP, ISO-M, and ISO-T) were averaged across all participants, and Spearman's correlation coefficients were used to assess relationships between these lingual pressure measures and the MBSImP scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final sample consisted of 39 participants post-ischemic stroke (ranging from 3 months to 27 months). Average MIP was 49.6 kPA (11.25), Saliva Swallow average was 19.0 kPa (11.25), average ISO-M was 11.1 s (12.65), and average ISO-T repetitions was 30 (22.8). There were significant, moderate correlations between ISO-M and Oral Total score (<i>r</i> = -.41, <i>p</i> = .0082); Component 1, Lip Closure (<i>r</i> = -.46, <i>p</i> = .0026); and Component 2, Tongue Control (<i>r</i> = -.48, <i>p</i> = .0016). All other correlations were nonsignificant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Isometric endurance was correlated with physiologic measures of oral swallow function. Inclusion of endurance testing in poststroke populations may add value in clinical assessment. Future studies should examine the predictive value of lingual functional measures in predicting swallow dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":51254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","volume":"68 5","pages":"2318-2338"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00605","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Poststroke dysphagia is characterized by deficits in lingual function. However, correlations between lingual function and oral and pharyngeal swallowing impairments have not been well defined. The aim of this preliminary study was to explore if tongue pressure generative capacity in patients after ischemic stroke is associated with oropharyngeal swallowing impairments.
Method: A cross-sectional convenience sample of ischemic stroke patients underwent a videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) and completed measures of lingual function (Saliva Swallow Pressure, maximum isometric pressure [MIP], Maximum Isometric Endurance [ISO-M], and Maximum Isotonic Endurance [ISO-T]) using the Tongueometer and Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) lingual manometry instruments. VFSS for each participant were consensus scored by two Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP)-certified raters. MBSImP Oral Total and Pharyngeal Total scores were calculated, and Swallow-by-Swallow MBSImP scores were summarized by calculating a percentage of the worst possible score across all bolus presentations for that score. Lingual measurements (swallow pressures, MIP, ISO-M, and ISO-T) were averaged across all participants, and Spearman's correlation coefficients were used to assess relationships between these lingual pressure measures and the MBSImP scores.
Results: The final sample consisted of 39 participants post-ischemic stroke (ranging from 3 months to 27 months). Average MIP was 49.6 kPA (11.25), Saliva Swallow average was 19.0 kPa (11.25), average ISO-M was 11.1 s (12.65), and average ISO-T repetitions was 30 (22.8). There were significant, moderate correlations between ISO-M and Oral Total score (r = -.41, p = .0082); Component 1, Lip Closure (r = -.46, p = .0026); and Component 2, Tongue Control (r = -.48, p = .0016). All other correlations were nonsignificant.
Conclusions: Isometric endurance was correlated with physiologic measures of oral swallow function. Inclusion of endurance testing in poststroke populations may add value in clinical assessment. Future studies should examine the predictive value of lingual functional measures in predicting swallow dysfunction.
期刊介绍:
Mission: JSLHR publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on the normal and disordered processes in speech, language, hearing, and related areas such as cognition, oral-motor function, and swallowing. The journal is an international outlet for both basic research on communication processes and clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, and management of communication disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. JSLHR seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of communication sciences and disorders, including speech production and perception; anatomy and physiology of speech and voice; genetics, biomechanics, and other basic sciences pertaining to human communication; mastication and swallowing; speech disorders; voice disorders; development of speech, language, or hearing in children; normal language processes; language disorders; disorders of hearing and balance; psychoacoustics; and anatomy and physiology of hearing.