Tissue Changes After Immediate Tooth Replacement With and Without Socket-Shield: 1-Year Prospective Study.

Hung-Chi Liao, Joseph Y K Kan, Kitichai Rungcharassaeng, Guo-Hao Lin, Otto Zuhr, Markus Hürzeler, Joey Chen, Jaime Lozada
{"title":"Tissue Changes After Immediate Tooth Replacement With and Without Socket-Shield: 1-Year Prospective Study.","authors":"Hung-Chi Liao, Joseph Y K Kan, Kitichai Rungcharassaeng, Guo-Hao Lin, Otto Zuhr, Markus Hürzeler, Joey Chen, Jaime Lozada","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>this study evaluates implant success rates and facial mucosal profile changes in maxillary single immediate implant placement and provisionalization with socket-shield (IIPP+SS) and without socket-shield (IIPP-SS) technique.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>thirty dental implants in 25 patients were assigned to either the IIPP-SS group (15 implants) or the IIPP+SS (15 implants) group. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were collected at pre-surgery (T0), 2- week (T1), 6-month (T6), and 12-month (T12) post-surgical follow-ups. The implant success rate, marginal bone level changes, facial mucosal level changes, and papilla level changes were evaluated at different time points. Facial mucosal profile changes were assessed individually for hard and soft tissue zones and as a whole using volumetric analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>two implants were excluded (1 patient dropped out and 1 implant failed) from the data analysis in this study, resulting in an overall implant success rate of 96.6% (28/29) after 1 year. Less facial mucosal profile changes were noted in the IIPP+SS group than in the IIPP-SS group, although the difference was only marginally statistically significant (p= 0.06). No statistically significant difference was found in the facial mucosal level changes (p=0.18) and papilla level changes (p = 0.67 for mesial papilla level and p = 0.41 for distal papilla level) changes between the IIPP-SS and IIPP+SS groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the limitations of this 1-year prospective study, IIPP+SS appears to maintain only the implant facial mucosal profile slightly better than IIPP alone. Both treatment modalities provide clinically satisfactory outcomes biologically, functionally, and esthetically.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: this study evaluates implant success rates and facial mucosal profile changes in maxillary single immediate implant placement and provisionalization with socket-shield (IIPP+SS) and without socket-shield (IIPP-SS) technique.

Materials & methods: thirty dental implants in 25 patients were assigned to either the IIPP-SS group (15 implants) or the IIPP+SS (15 implants) group. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were collected at pre-surgery (T0), 2- week (T1), 6-month (T6), and 12-month (T12) post-surgical follow-ups. The implant success rate, marginal bone level changes, facial mucosal level changes, and papilla level changes were evaluated at different time points. Facial mucosal profile changes were assessed individually for hard and soft tissue zones and as a whole using volumetric analysis.

Results: two implants were excluded (1 patient dropped out and 1 implant failed) from the data analysis in this study, resulting in an overall implant success rate of 96.6% (28/29) after 1 year. Less facial mucosal profile changes were noted in the IIPP+SS group than in the IIPP-SS group, although the difference was only marginally statistically significant (p= 0.06). No statistically significant difference was found in the facial mucosal level changes (p=0.18) and papilla level changes (p = 0.67 for mesial papilla level and p = 0.41 for distal papilla level) changes between the IIPP-SS and IIPP+SS groups.

Conclusions: Within the limitations of this 1-year prospective study, IIPP+SS appears to maintain only the implant facial mucosal profile slightly better than IIPP alone. Both treatment modalities provide clinically satisfactory outcomes biologically, functionally, and esthetically.

即刻牙齿置换后的组织变化:1年前瞻性研究。
目的:本研究评估采用牙套-屏蔽(IIPP+SS)和不采用牙套-屏蔽(IIPP-SS)技术的上颌单次即刻种植体放置和预备种植体的成功率和面部粘膜轮廓的变化。材料与方法:25例患者30枚种植体分为IIPP-SS组(15枚)和IIPP+SS组(15枚)。收集术前(T0)、术后2周(T1)、6个月(T6)和12个月(T12)随访的临床和影像学结果。观察不同时间点种植体成功率、边缘骨水平变化、面部黏膜水平变化、乳头水平变化。面部粘膜剖面变化分别评估硬组织和软组织区域,并使用体积分析作为整体。结果:本研究在数据分析中排除了2例种植体(1例患者退出,1例种植体失败),1年后整体种植成功率为96.6%(28/29)。与IIPP-SS组相比,IIPP+SS组的面部粘膜变化较少,尽管差异仅具有统计学意义(p= 0.06)。IIPP-SS组与IIPP+SS组的面部粘膜水平变化(p=0.18)和乳头水平变化(近端乳头水平p= 0.67,远端乳头水平p= 0.41)差异无统计学意义。结论:在这项为期1年的前瞻性研究的局限性内,IIPP+SS似乎仅维持种植体面部粘膜轮廓略好于单独IIPP。两种治疗方式在生物学、功能和美学方面都提供了令人满意的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信