Josep De Alcaraz-Fossoul PhD, Michelle V. Mancenido PhD, Jena Aileen Johanson MS, Carme Barrot-Feixat PhD
{"title":"Reproducibility and repeatability experiment with nested factors applied to the evaluation of a fingerprint morphometric","authors":"Josep De Alcaraz-Fossoul PhD, Michelle V. Mancenido PhD, Jena Aileen Johanson MS, Carme Barrot-Feixat PhD","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.70055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this article, a redefined gage reproducibility and repeatability (R&R) method is proposed to identify possible sources of error and variation components in a fingerprint morphometric measurement system. Unlike traditional gage R&R, this new method incorporates a linear mixed effects model that accounts for a mix of random and fixed effects, nested factors, and repeated measurements. The model relies on the analysis of data from one study involving the measurement of ridge width dimensions. The data set was collected from four types of finger impressions provided by 10 donors: inked-rolled (RL) and inked-flat (FL) on paper, as well as minimally distorted latents recovered with white powder (LW) and black powder (LB) on plastic. To assess reproducibility and repeatability, four examiners manually measured each impression 24–36 times at predetermined ridge locations, generating ≈3000–4000 measurements per appraiser. The results highlight the effect of minimal skin distortion on ridge width measurements and reveal high repeatability (i.e., low intra-examiner variation) but relatively low reproducibility among examiners (i.e., high inter-examiner variation). Further, it is demonstrated that the variance decomposition framework is effective in parsing out sources of variation in the ridge width measurement process.</p>","PeriodicalId":15743,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":"70 4","pages":"1527-1536"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1556-4029.70055","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1556-4029.70055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this article, a redefined gage reproducibility and repeatability (R&R) method is proposed to identify possible sources of error and variation components in a fingerprint morphometric measurement system. Unlike traditional gage R&R, this new method incorporates a linear mixed effects model that accounts for a mix of random and fixed effects, nested factors, and repeated measurements. The model relies on the analysis of data from one study involving the measurement of ridge width dimensions. The data set was collected from four types of finger impressions provided by 10 donors: inked-rolled (RL) and inked-flat (FL) on paper, as well as minimally distorted latents recovered with white powder (LW) and black powder (LB) on plastic. To assess reproducibility and repeatability, four examiners manually measured each impression 24–36 times at predetermined ridge locations, generating ≈3000–4000 measurements per appraiser. The results highlight the effect of minimal skin distortion on ridge width measurements and reveal high repeatability (i.e., low intra-examiner variation) but relatively low reproducibility among examiners (i.e., high inter-examiner variation). Further, it is demonstrated that the variance decomposition framework is effective in parsing out sources of variation in the ridge width measurement process.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Forensic Sciences (JFS) is the official publication of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS). It is devoted to the publication of original investigations, observations, scholarly inquiries and reviews in various branches of the forensic sciences. These include anthropology, criminalistics, digital and multimedia sciences, engineering and applied sciences, pathology/biology, psychiatry and behavioral science, jurisprudence, odontology, questioned documents, and toxicology. Similar submissions dealing with forensic aspects of other sciences and the social sciences are also accepted, as are submissions dealing with scientifically sound emerging science disciplines. The content and/or views expressed in the JFS are not necessarily those of the AAFS, the JFS Editorial Board, the organizations with which authors are affiliated, or the publisher of JFS. All manuscript submissions are double-blind peer-reviewed.