The Relationship Between Abnormal Morphokinetic Embryos, Genetic Testing Results, and Clinical Outcomes.

Diem Thi Yen, Nguyen Khang Son, Nguyen Thi Hue Giang, Le Thi Quyen, Doan Nhu Tho, Tran Thi Dieu Thuy, Nguyen Xuan Hoi
{"title":"The Relationship Between Abnormal Morphokinetic Embryos, Genetic Testing Results, and Clinical Outcomes.","authors":"Diem Thi Yen, Nguyen Khang Son, Nguyen Thi Hue Giang, Le Thi Quyen, Doan Nhu Tho, Tran Thi Dieu Thuy, Nguyen Xuan Hoi","doi":"10.5455/medarh.2025.79.4-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Embryo quality is a crucial factor in the success of in vitro fertilization (IVF). Morphokinetics, which refers to the timing and sequence of embryonic cell division and development, has gained attention as a potential indicator of embryo viability and genetic competence.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates the relationship between abnormal embryonic morphokinetics and genetic analysis results, and their impact on clinical outcomes in assisted reproductive technology (ART).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conducted at Duc Phuc Hospital with Hanoi Medical University from January to December 2023, the prospective study included 152 patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF). A total of 968 blastocysts were analyzed using preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). Time-lapse monitoring assessed cell division milestones and abnormal morphokinetic patterns, including direct cleavage, reverse cleavage, multinucleation, and vacuole. Patients received a single euploid embryo transfer. Clinical outcomes were tracked to the live birth stage, analyzed using SPSS 20.0, with p-values < 0.05 considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 583 blastocysts, 294 (50.4%) showed abnormal cleavage patterns. The aneuploidy rate was higher in embryos with reverse cleavage (56.1%) and multinucleation (50%), while direct cleavage and vacuolization showed no significant correlation. Early blastocyst formation (≥100 hours) was linked to a higher aneuploidy rate (60.8%). Nonetheless, clinical outcomes, such as β-hCG positivity and live birth rates, were similar between abnormal and normal cleavage groups when euploid embryos were transferred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Abnormal morphokinetic patterns are linked to higher aneuploidy rates, but do not significantly affect clinical outcomes when euploid embryos are selected. Integrating genetic testing with morphokinetic assessment can optimize ART success rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":94135,"journal":{"name":"Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)","volume":"79 1","pages":"4-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045586/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2025.79.4-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Embryo quality is a crucial factor in the success of in vitro fertilization (IVF). Morphokinetics, which refers to the timing and sequence of embryonic cell division and development, has gained attention as a potential indicator of embryo viability and genetic competence.

Objective: This study evaluates the relationship between abnormal embryonic morphokinetics and genetic analysis results, and their impact on clinical outcomes in assisted reproductive technology (ART).

Methods: Conducted at Duc Phuc Hospital with Hanoi Medical University from January to December 2023, the prospective study included 152 patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF). A total of 968 blastocysts were analyzed using preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). Time-lapse monitoring assessed cell division milestones and abnormal morphokinetic patterns, including direct cleavage, reverse cleavage, multinucleation, and vacuole. Patients received a single euploid embryo transfer. Clinical outcomes were tracked to the live birth stage, analyzed using SPSS 20.0, with p-values < 0.05 considered significant.

Results: Of 583 blastocysts, 294 (50.4%) showed abnormal cleavage patterns. The aneuploidy rate was higher in embryos with reverse cleavage (56.1%) and multinucleation (50%), while direct cleavage and vacuolization showed no significant correlation. Early blastocyst formation (≥100 hours) was linked to a higher aneuploidy rate (60.8%). Nonetheless, clinical outcomes, such as β-hCG positivity and live birth rates, were similar between abnormal and normal cleavage groups when euploid embryos were transferred.

Conclusion: Abnormal morphokinetic patterns are linked to higher aneuploidy rates, but do not significantly affect clinical outcomes when euploid embryos are selected. Integrating genetic testing with morphokinetic assessment can optimize ART success rates.

异常形态动力学胚胎、基因检测结果和临床结果之间的关系。
背景:胚胎质量是体外受精(IVF)成功的关键因素。形态动力学是指胚胎细胞分裂和发育的时间和顺序,作为胚胎活力和遗传能力的潜在指标而受到关注。目的:探讨胚胎形态动力学异常与基因分析结果的关系及其对辅助生殖技术(ART)临床结果的影响。方法:前瞻性研究于2023年1月至12月在河内医科大学德福医院进行,纳入152例体外受精患者。对968个囊胚进行着床前非整倍体基因检测(PGT-A)。延时监测评估细胞分裂里程碑和异常形态动力学模式,包括直接分裂、反向分裂、多核和液泡。患者接受单个整倍体胚胎移植。临床结果跟踪至活产期,使用SPSS 20.0进行分析,p值< 0.05为显著性。结果:583个囊胚中,卵裂形态异常294个(50.4%)。反分裂和多核的胚非整倍性较高(56.1%),而直接分裂和空泡化的胚非整倍性无显著相关性。早期囊胚形成(≥100小时)与较高的非整倍体率(60.8%)相关。尽管如此,当整倍体胚胎移植时,临床结果,如β-hCG阳性和活产率,在异常和正常卵裂组之间是相似的。结论:异常的形态动力学模式与较高的非整倍体发生率有关,但在选择整倍体胚胎时不会显著影响临床结果。将基因检测与形态动力学评估相结合可以优化抗逆转录病毒治疗的成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信