Recent discoveries from clinical trials: why opioids should not be used for dyspnea management in COPD.

Expert review of respiratory medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-23 DOI:10.1080/17476348.2025.2494643
Nicholas T Vozoris
{"title":"Recent discoveries from clinical trials: why opioids should not be used for dyspnea management in COPD.","authors":"Nicholas T Vozoris","doi":"10.1080/17476348.2025.2494643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic breathlessness among persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a distressing and limiting symptom and a substantial management challenge for healthcare practitioners. Historically, multiple professional respiratory societies have encouraged the prescription of opioid drugs as a therapeutic intervention for chronic breathlessness. However, in 2024, the European Respiratory Society (ERS) published clinical practice guidelines that markedly departed from such traditional recommendations and stated that opioids should not be used for chronic breathlessness.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This manuscript will review recently published, well-designed, randomized controlled trials (literature was searched on PubMed from January 2020 to January 2025) that evaluated the efficacy of oral opioids for chronic breathlessness in persons with COPD and which influenced the new position adopted by ERS in 2024.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Recent, well-designed, adequately powered clinical trials consistently demonstrate that oral opioids are not effective at reducing chronic breathlessness (nor at improving overall quality of life, functional status or exercise tolerance) amongst individuals with advanced COPD. Other professional respiratory societies need to consider and potentially embrace the new ERS position on opioids for dyspnea in COPD, so as to guide members away from an unhelpful, and in some cases harmful, management paradigm.</p>","PeriodicalId":94007,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"673-678"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2025.2494643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic breathlessness among persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a distressing and limiting symptom and a substantial management challenge for healthcare practitioners. Historically, multiple professional respiratory societies have encouraged the prescription of opioid drugs as a therapeutic intervention for chronic breathlessness. However, in 2024, the European Respiratory Society (ERS) published clinical practice guidelines that markedly departed from such traditional recommendations and stated that opioids should not be used for chronic breathlessness.

Areas covered: This manuscript will review recently published, well-designed, randomized controlled trials (literature was searched on PubMed from January 2020 to January 2025) that evaluated the efficacy of oral opioids for chronic breathlessness in persons with COPD and which influenced the new position adopted by ERS in 2024.

Expert opinion: Recent, well-designed, adequately powered clinical trials consistently demonstrate that oral opioids are not effective at reducing chronic breathlessness (nor at improving overall quality of life, functional status or exercise tolerance) amongst individuals with advanced COPD. Other professional respiratory societies need to consider and potentially embrace the new ERS position on opioids for dyspnea in COPD, so as to guide members away from an unhelpful, and in some cases harmful, management paradigm.

临床试验的最新发现:为什么阿片类药物不应用于慢性阻塞性肺病的呼吸困难治疗。
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的慢性呼吸困难是一种令人痛苦和限制的症状,也是医疗保健从业者面临的重大管理挑战。历史上,多个专业呼吸学会鼓励处方阿片类药物作为慢性呼吸困难的治疗干预措施。然而,在2024年,欧洲呼吸学会(ERS)发布的临床实践指南明显偏离了这些传统建议,并指出阿片类药物不应用于慢性呼吸困难。涉及领域:本文将回顾近期发表的、设计良好的随机对照试验(文献检索自PubMed,检索时间为2020年1月至2025年1月),这些试验评估了口服阿片类药物治疗慢性阻塞性肺病患者慢性呼吸困难的疗效,并影响了2024年ERS采用的新立场。专家意见:最近,设计良好,充分支持的临床试验一致表明,口服阿片类药物不能有效减少晚期COPD患者的慢性呼吸困难(也不能改善整体生活质量,功能状态或运动耐量)。其他专业呼吸学会需要考虑并可能接受急诊医师对阿片类药物治疗慢性阻塞性肺病呼吸困难的新立场,从而引导成员远离无益的、在某些情况下有害的管理模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信