The efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.4
Yi-Cheng Lin, Sheng-Han Kuo, Chin-Po Lin, Li-Hung Chang
{"title":"The efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yi-Cheng Lin, Sheng-Han Kuo, Chin-Po Lin, Li-Hung Chang","doi":"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) is a group of hereditary neurodegenerative disorders characterized by the progressive incoordination of gait, impaired motor control, and various neurological deficits. Therapeutic options for SCA remain limited. However, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has gained attention as a potential intervention due to its noninvasive nature, ease of application, and favorable safety profile. To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of rTMS in SCA, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted to identify RCTs assessing rTMS for SCA management. The primary outcomes of interest included changes in motor function as measured by the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) or the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS). Our analysis included eight RCTs involving a total of 237 participants. Meta-analysis results demonstrated statistically significant improvements in motor function. Specifically, SARA scores showed a mean difference (MD) of -1.56 (95% CI, -2.88 to -0.24; p = 0.02), and ICARS scores improved with an MD of -3.16 (95% CI, -3.93 to -2.39; p < 0.001) compared with a sham group. To evaluate the effects of different rTMS protocols on SCA, we performed subgroup analyses of low-frequency (LF), high-frequency (HF), and intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS). We revealed that LF (MD, -1.60; 95% CI, -3.06 to -0.13; p = 0.03) and iTBS (MD, -1.68; 95% CI, -2.29 to -1.08; p < 0.001) were effective in significantly improving SARA. The HF group showed a reduction in SARA scores (MD, -1.52; 95% CI, -6.34 to 3.30; p = 0.54) but without significance because of the small sample size. These findings indicate that overall rTMS is a promising therapeutic approach for alleviating motor symptoms in hereditary SCA patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","volume":" ","pages":"417-424"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) is a group of hereditary neurodegenerative disorders characterized by the progressive incoordination of gait, impaired motor control, and various neurological deficits. Therapeutic options for SCA remain limited. However, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has gained attention as a potential intervention due to its noninvasive nature, ease of application, and favorable safety profile. To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of rTMS in SCA, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted to identify RCTs assessing rTMS for SCA management. The primary outcomes of interest included changes in motor function as measured by the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) or the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS). Our analysis included eight RCTs involving a total of 237 participants. Meta-analysis results demonstrated statistically significant improvements in motor function. Specifically, SARA scores showed a mean difference (MD) of -1.56 (95% CI, -2.88 to -0.24; p = 0.02), and ICARS scores improved with an MD of -3.16 (95% CI, -3.93 to -2.39; p < 0.001) compared with a sham group. To evaluate the effects of different rTMS protocols on SCA, we performed subgroup analyses of low-frequency (LF), high-frequency (HF), and intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS). We revealed that LF (MD, -1.60; 95% CI, -3.06 to -0.13; p = 0.03) and iTBS (MD, -1.68; 95% CI, -2.29 to -1.08; p < 0.001) were effective in significantly improving SARA. The HF group showed a reduction in SARA scores (MD, -1.52; 95% CI, -6.34 to 3.30; p = 0.54) but without significance because of the small sample size. These findings indicate that overall rTMS is a promising therapeutic approach for alleviating motor symptoms in hereditary SCA patients.

反复经颅磁刺激治疗脊髓小脑性共济失调的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
脊髓小脑性共济失调(SCA)是一组以进行性步态不协调、运动控制受损和各种神经功能缺陷为特征的遗传性神经退行性疾病。SCA的治疗选择仍然有限。然而,重复性经颅磁刺激(rTMS)由于其无创性、易于应用和良好的安全性而成为一种潜在的干预手段。为了评估rTMS治疗SCA的疗效,我们对随机对照试验(rct)进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。我们对PubMed、Medline和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行了全面的检索,以确定评估rTMS对SCA管理的随机对照试验。主要结果包括运动功能的变化,由共济失调评估和评定量表(SARA)或国际合作共济失调评定量表(ICARS)测量。我们的分析包括8项随机对照试验,共涉及237名参与者。荟萃分析结果显示,运动功能有统计学上的显著改善。具体而言,SARA评分的平均差异(MD)为-1.56(95%置信区间,CI: -2.88至-0.24;p = 0.02), ICARS评分改善,MD为-3.16 (95% CI: -3.93 ~ -2.39;P < 0.001)。为了评估不同rTMS方案对SCA的影响,我们对低频(LF)、高频(HF)和间歇性θ波爆发刺激(iTBS)进行了亚组分析。我们发现LF (MD: -1.60, 95% CI: -3.06 ~ -0.13, p = 0.03)和iTBS (MD: -1.68, 95% CI: -2.29 ~ -1.08, p < 0.001)可显著改善SARA。HF组SARA评分降低(MD: -1.52, 95% CI: -6.34 ~ 3.30, p = 0.54),但由于样本量小,无显著性差异。这些发现表明,整体rTMS是缓解遗传性SCA患者运动症状的一种有希望的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信