Racial issues in psychiatry: a thematic analysis of an initial health equity educational activity for medical students.

IF 3 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Paige Pickerl, Tanya Sorrell, Mennefer Blue, Kamaria Patterson, Neeral Sheth, Sahara Givens
{"title":"Racial issues in psychiatry: a thematic analysis of an initial health equity educational activity for medical students.","authors":"Paige Pickerl, Tanya Sorrell, Mennefer Blue, Kamaria Patterson, Neeral Sheth, Sahara Givens","doi":"10.1186/s12910-025-01215-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Current research documents both the historical impact of racism in healthcare as well as studies piloting antiracist interventions as part of medical training to ameliorate its stigma, bias, and consequences in medicine. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively analyze the impact of a one session lecture surrounding racial issues in psychiatry on third-year medical students' thoughts and reflections surrounding the content.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Remote methodologies were used to engage medical students in a lecture created by a major University's Substance Use Disorder Center of Excellence to address the legacy of racial issues in psychiatry as well as present interventions. The team collected anonymous evaluations via anonymous chat submission after each lecture. Qualitative evaluation data were compiled from 108 students across 11 sessions over the course of a year. The team reviewed major and minor themes and synthesized following the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) guidelines for qualitative reporting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified the following five themes:1) appreciation and notes on the content itself; 2) how the information presented can impact future clinical care; 3) the interconnectedness of social determinants of health and racism; 4) recognizing power dynamics with patients; and 5) opportunities for future education.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Information compiled both from participating students and the available literature can inform future education efforts to build opportunities for antiracist training in medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"26 1","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039112/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01215-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Current research documents both the historical impact of racism in healthcare as well as studies piloting antiracist interventions as part of medical training to ameliorate its stigma, bias, and consequences in medicine. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively analyze the impact of a one session lecture surrounding racial issues in psychiatry on third-year medical students' thoughts and reflections surrounding the content.

Methodology: Remote methodologies were used to engage medical students in a lecture created by a major University's Substance Use Disorder Center of Excellence to address the legacy of racial issues in psychiatry as well as present interventions. The team collected anonymous evaluations via anonymous chat submission after each lecture. Qualitative evaluation data were compiled from 108 students across 11 sessions over the course of a year. The team reviewed major and minor themes and synthesized following the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) guidelines for qualitative reporting.

Results: We identified the following five themes:1) appreciation and notes on the content itself; 2) how the information presented can impact future clinical care; 3) the interconnectedness of social determinants of health and racism; 4) recognizing power dynamics with patients; and 5) opportunities for future education.

Conclusion: Information compiled both from participating students and the available literature can inform future education efforts to build opportunities for antiracist training in medical education.

精神病学中的种族问题:对医学生初步健康平等教育活动的专题分析。
目前的研究记录了种族主义在医疗保健中的历史影响,以及将反种族主义干预作为医疗培训的一部分进行试点研究,以改善其在医学中的耻辱、偏见和后果。本研究的目的是定性分析一节关于精神病学种族问题的讲座对医三学生围绕内容的思考和反思的影响。方法:采用远程方法让医科学生参加由一所主要大学的物质使用障碍卓越中心创建的讲座,以解决精神病学中种族问题的遗留问题以及当前的干预措施。该小组在每次讲座结束后通过匿名聊天提交匿名评价。对108名学生进行了为期一年的11次定性评估。该小组审查了主要和次要主题,并根据质量研究报告标准(SRQR)的质量报告准则进行了综合。结果:我们确定了以下五个主题:1)对内容本身的欣赏和注释;2)所呈现的信息如何影响未来的临床护理;3)健康和种族主义的社会决定因素之间的相互联系;4)识别患者的权力动态;以及未来教育的机会。结论:从参与的学生和现有文献中收集的信息可以为今后的教育工作提供信息,以便在医学教育中建立反种族主义培训的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信